[Bug middle-end/103870] ARM: Wrong branch instruction with optimization O2 and higher

2021-12-30 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870 --- Comment #1 from Petro Karashchenko --- I would expect "bgt" instruction instead of "bne" in such case.

[Bug middle-end/103870] New: ARM: Wrong branch instruction with optimization O2 and higher

2021-12-30 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870 Bug ID: 103870 Summary: ARM: Wrong branch instruction with optimization O2 and higher Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #20 from Petro Karashchenko --- I just checked next case typedef int tolerant_int __attribute__((aligned(1))); tolerant_int var; int foo(void) { return var; } -- arm-none-eabi-gcc -save-temps

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #19 from Petro Karashchenko --- Sorry my bad again. Just checked with GCC 11 man page When used on a struct, or struct member, the aligned attribute can only increase the alignment; in order to decrease it, the packed attribute

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #18 from Petro Karashchenko --- Yes. So I just checked GCC man and see that The aligned attribute can only increase the alignment; but you can decrease it by specifying packed as well. See below. Note that the effectiveness of

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #16 from Petro Karashchenko --- Again based on your description even if we go with putting "tolerance" on the type should not work because in "typedef int tolerant_int __attribute__((aligned(1)));" the "int" default alignment is 4

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #14 from Petro Karashchenko --- Probably I need to fill a ticket to allow "packed" to be applied for variables and not only to a types of structure fields.

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #13 from Petro Karashchenko --- Sorry that I brought some confusion. I was reading some latest comments and didn't fully payed attention to a ticket description. The reason for my comment is

[Bug middle-end/88085] User alignments on var decls not respected if smaller than type alignment

2021-09-02 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88085 --- Comment #11 from Petro Karashchenko --- Sorry but based on @cindex @code{aligned} variable attribute @item aligned @itemx aligned (@var{alignment}) The @code{aligned} attribute specifies a MINIMUM alignment for the variable or structure