[Bug libstdc++/115124] New: Typo: `++this` instead of `++*this`

2024-05-16 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115124 Bug ID: 115124 Summary: Typo: `++this` instead of `++*this` Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode

2024-04-18 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 --- Comment #4 from Sirraide --- Yeah, we figured that that was why they’re not supported in `-gnu89` mode, but I thought I’d ask just to be sure.

[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode

2024-04-18 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 --- Comment #2 from Sirraide --- Thanks!

[Bug c/114773] New: Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode

2024-04-18 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 Bug ID: 114773 Summary: Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/114210] Potential bug wrt __restrict on member function decl/def

2024-03-30 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114210 --- Comment #3 from Sirraide --- Ah, that makes sense: it’s basically treated like any other top-level cv-qualifier on a function parameter—it’s just that it happens to syntactically be in an unusual place compared to cv-qualifiers on regular

[Bug c++/114257] New: Error when 'this' is used in a lambda with an explicit object parameter

2024-03-06 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114257 Bug ID: 114257 Summary: Error when 'this' is used in a lambda with an explicit object parameter Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/114210] New: Potential bug wrt __restrict on member function decl/def

2024-03-02 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114210 Bug ID: 114210 Summary: Potential bug wrt __restrict on member function decl/def Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/109692] New: ICE on concept as default template parameter to iife lambda in fold expression in static member template function

2023-05-02 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109692 Bug ID: 109692 Summary: ICE on concept as default template parameter to iife lambda in fold expression in static member template function Product: gcc Version:

[Bug other/108471] New: Suboptimal codegen for __int128 subtraction on x86_64

2023-01-19 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108471 Bug ID: 108471 Summary: Suboptimal codegen for __int128 subtraction on x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/105143] New: ICE when trying to emit a [[nodiscard]] warning

2022-04-03 Thread rl.alt.accnt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105143 Bug ID: 105143 Summary: ICE when trying to emit a [[nodiscard]] warning Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3