I suppose I should answer my own question
Yes, the final compiler built has ubsan enabled.
Gary
PS. The faint hearted should note this is an overnight build. It would be nice
if this wasn't tied to building a bootstrap compiler.
From: Gary Oblock
Sent:
Toon,
I assume the final compiler built this way has ubsan? I ask because
I'm trying to spot a bug in a new optimization so I want to
run it on a specific test case with the new optimization
enabled.
Thanks,
Gary
From: Toon Moene
Sent: Monday, September 27,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 2:48 AM Toon Moene wrote:
>
> On 9/28/21 8:35 AM, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
>
> >> Can ubsan be used on the compiler itself?
>
> I regularly build the compiler(s) natively with ubsan enabled, see for
> instance:
>
>
On 9/28/21 8:35 AM, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
Can ubsan be used on the compiler itself?
I regularly build the compiler(s) natively with ubsan enabled, see for
instance:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-September/719448.html
The configure line tells you how to do it
Hi,
just as a note. This is also of interest to me. I have wanted to
compile a single pass that I wrote using ubsan/other sanitizers for
testing purposes. I was wondering if someone has already modified the
build system to use ubsan to test their passes and if they could
document the process for
I tried just adding "-fsanitize=undefined" to my CXX_FLAGS and got
a bunch of errors like this:
/usr/bin/ld: ../libcody/libcody.a(server.o): in function
`std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator
>::_Alloc_hider::~_Alloc_hider()':
/usr/include/c++/9/bits/basic_string.h:150: undefined reference
