Snapshot gcc-11-20220409 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20220409/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
I can confirm this patch fixes t033 failure. LGTM, except...
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/loongarch/loongarch.cc: Fix bug for
> tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t033.
^^ These two whitespaces should not exist
(I was taught this just several days ago :)
--
Xi Ruoyao
Here's the updated patch.
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:22 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 18:41 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Here's the updated patch.
> >
>
> Thanks. Review below:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105205
Bug ID: 105205
Summary: Incorrect assignment of derived type with allocatable,
deferred-length character component
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103376
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4943b75e9f06f0b64ed541430bb7fbccf55fc552
commit r12-8070-g4943b75e9f06f0b64ed541430bb7fbccf55fc552
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103818
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
We have access list:
Base 0: alias set 2
Ref 0: alias set 1
access: Parm 0 param offset:0 offset:-4611686018427387936 size:32
max_size:32
access: Parm 0 param offset:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
Bug ID: 105206
Summary: mis-optimization with -ffast-math and __builtin_powf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Here's the updated patch.
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:01 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-30 at 20:38 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This patch adds support for setting the alignment of variables in
> > libgccjit.
>
> Thanks. Sorry about the delay in
Hi,
this patch adds logic to propagate nondeterministic and side_effects
bits in modref when summary is updated after inlining.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-04-09 Jan Hubicka
* ipa-modref.cc (ipa_merge_modref_summary_after_inlining): Propagate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi,
This patch solves problem with FE first finalizing function and then adding
-fno-semantic-interposition flag (by parsing optimization attribute).
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Honza
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-04-09 Jan Hubicka
PR ipa/103376
* cgraphunit.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:23:39AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from
From: chenglulu
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc: Fix bug for
tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t033.
---
gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
There is another, much worse, problem, reported and analyzed by "Michael S"
on comp.arch. The code has
#ifdef HAVE_SQRTL
{
long double xl = (long double) x;
if (xl <= LDBL_MAX && xl >= LDBL_MIN)
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/contribute.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/contribute.html b/htdocs/contribute.html
index c0223738..c985b87d 100644
--- a/htdocs/contribute.html
+++ b/htdocs/contribute.html
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ eliminate them all.
Web
在 2022/4/9 上午5:46, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
A simple testcase change, tested on loongarch64-linux-gnuabif64. Ok for trunk?
---
On LoongArch, variadic functions use different arugment passing
conventions so this test is not valid (see the section named "Variadic
argument" in the [ELF ABI][1]) and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105180
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105130
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82261
--- Comment #4 from Peter Cordes ---
GCC will emit SHLD / SHRD as part of shifting an integer that's two registers
wide.
Hironori Bono proposed the following functions as a workaround for this missed
optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> There is another, much worse, problem, reported and analyzed by "Michael S"
> on comp.arch. The code has
>
> #ifdef HAVE_SQRTL
> {
> long double xl =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> > There is another, much worse, problem, reported and analyzed by "Michael S"
> > on comp.arch. The code has
> >
在 2022/4/9 上午5:48, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
Another simple testcase change for LoongArch. Ok for trunk?
---
LoongArch backend allocates two additional 8-byte stack slots for LP64,
one for saving $fp and another for saving the temporary value "1".
Ideally they are both unneeded, but (1) we're using -O0
Hi!
Here is an attempt to resolve a P1 regression, where due to threading
changes we no longer optimize
bool foo(int i) {
while (i == 4)
i += 2;
return i;
}
to just return i != 0; by enhancing the phiopt value_replacement
optimization. Normally it will optimize x != cst1 ? x :
I pushed this for now.
Gaius, if you want to make changes to that section of readings.html,
absolutely be free doing so (and I'll be happy help, too).
Gerald
---
htdocs/readings.html | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/readings.html b/htdocs/readings.html
index
PR analyzer/103892 reports a false positive from -Wanalyzer-double-free.
The root cause is the analyzer failing to properly handle "unknown"
symbolic regions, and thus confusing two different expressions.
Specifically, the analyzer eventually hits the complexity limit for
symbolic values, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
Pavel M changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C preprocessor: splicing|Translation phase 2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this only matters if you preprocessing the file yourself; that is
-save-temps works correctly and errors out that there is a stray '#' in
program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93687
Evgeniy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xtemp09 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103378
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
Bug ID: 105207
Summary: C preprocessor: splicing physical source lines to form
logical source lines may not work
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:29:52AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase ICEs with C++ and is incorrectly rejected with C.
> The reason is that both FEs use ridpointers identifiers for CPP_KEYWORD
> and value or u.value for CPP_NAME e.g. when parsing attributes or OpenMP
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103892
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d41408c5d28105e7a3ea2eb2529431a70b96369
commit r12-8071-g3d41408c5d28105e7a3ea2eb2529431a70b96369
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103680
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
The cfgcleanup logic is consistent assuming that your profile was consistent on
the input (i.e. read from profile feedback). If you
1) read profile
2) do optimization and prove that given if conditional is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
--- Comment #1 from Pavel M ---
The same behavior with:
xxx \
error
Expected:
xxx error
Actual:
xxx
error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||malashkin.andrey at gmail dot
com
---
40 matches
Mail list logo
