Hi,
is there some sort of concise explanation of how to use the
scripts in contrib/reghunt? There is no real documentation
for what is in the directory, specifically not how to invoke
them, and which directory to invoke them from. I have also
not been able to do run the examples from
For
Sent from my iPhonezoiw o. I.
a. matter that that you were your office with o one I’m I’m going in C
CD was the
Snapshot gcc-14-20231001 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20231001/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111639
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Which versions of avr-libc are supported with gcc?
The versions are only very loosely coupled. Anything from AVR-LibC v1.8 on (or
maybe even older)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111639
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So then we do need to fix the autoconf macros.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
--- Comment #1 from Yunus Ayar ---
Created attachment 56021
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56021=edit
Output of g++ -save-temps; I compressed it because it is 7.5 MB big and would
exceed the file size limit
I have
(I shortened the recipient list)
Am Sonntag, dem 01.10.2023 um 02:55 +0200 schrieb Alejandro Colomar:
> >
...
> I ran the tests, and get some unexpected failure. I used dg-warning,
> but maybe I used it wrong? Here's the output:
>
> ```
> output is:
>
Warn about the following:
char s[3] = "foo";
Initializing a char array with a string literal of the same length as
the size of the array is usually a mistake. Rarely is the case where
one wants to create a non-terminated character sequence from a string
literal.
In some cases, for writing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
Bug ID: 111651
Summary: Specific syntax with C++ 20 designated initializers
and coroutines breaks
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110951
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111654
Bug ID: 111654
Summary: Introduce clang's invalid-noreturn warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
Committed to trunk, thanks Feng :)
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 3:34 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/12/23 03:18, Feng Wang wrote:
> > New patch add some comments and update docs for this new usage.
> > ---
> > Accoring to Kito's advice, using "MASK(name) Var(other_flag_name)"
> > to generate MASK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111646
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to vishwambhar.rathi from comment #4)
> I am not using any optimization flag in compiling. Where should I post about
> this bug? Thanks.
I don't know because maybe this is a Glibc issue or a QEMU
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 09:37:59AM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> (I shortened the recipient list)
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 01.10.2023 um 02:55 +0200 schrieb Alejandro Colomar:
>
> > >
> ...
> > I ran the tests, and get some unexpected failure. I used dg-warning,
> > but maybe I used it wrong?
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231001 (experimental) (GCC)
[506] %
[506] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
[507] %
[507] % gcctk -O3 small.c
[508] % ./a.out
Aborted
[509] %
[509] % cat small.c
From: Alejandro Colomar
Warn about the following:
char s[3] = "foo";
Initializing a char array with a string literal of the same length as
the size of the array is usually a mistake. Rarely is the case where
one wants to create a non-terminated character sequence from a string
literal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111653
Bug ID: 111653
Summary: make bootstrap4 fails for -fchecking=2 code generation
changes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111639
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
May I ask, are you working on getting libstdc++ to work for avr?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Another testcase which shows a related issue:
```
double t = 0.0/0.0;
int
main ()
{
double x = 0.0/0.0;
return __builtin_signbit (x) != __builtin_signbit (t);
}
```
And another one:
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111639
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Anything that doesn't work on avr should be considered a bug, like any other
target.
From: Frederik Harwath
OMP_CLAUSE_TILE will be used for the OpenMP 5.1 loop transformation
construct "omp tile".
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-core.h (enum omp_clause_code): Rename OMP_CLAUSE_TILE.
* tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_TILE_LIST): Rename to ...
(OMP_CLAUSE_OACC_TILE_LIST): ...
This series of patches is an update of Frederik's previous loop
transformation patch set, previously posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/614564.html
that has been updated to resolve conflicts with my set of
imperfectly-nested loops patches and other changes on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||79649
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
>
> Note GCC and clang even disagree on the first testcase but agree with the
> second one.
Oh and the C and C++ front-end even disagree with each other.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111429
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://no-color.org/
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111639
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Not particularly, I just want to be able to bootstrap on avr with
--enable-libstdcxx
It works pretty well already, especially with the -ffreestanding changes in gcc
13.
Hi Andre,
All is well that ends well! Thanks for working on this.
Regards
Paul
On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 14:16, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> back porting to gcc-13 unfortunately caused a regression due to
> gfc_deallocate_with_status() having a different parameter count. This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111645
--- Comment #4 from Steven Munroe ---
Actually shift/rotate intrinsic: ,vec_rl, vec_rlmi, vec_rlnm, vec_sl, vec_sr,
vec_sra
Support vector __int128 as required for the PowerISA 3.1 POWER vector
shift/rotate quadword instructions
But:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111331
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cda1992a56779e5c60a70f251542a6f662fdfa60
commit r13-7928-gcda1992a56779e5c60a70f251542a6f662fdfa60
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] Wrong |[11/12 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110913
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111642
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-01
Ever confirmed|0
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 01:01:57PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/10/23 07:04, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > In the former fix in commit 41ef5a34161356817807be3a2e51fbdbe575ae85 I
> > completely missed the fact that the normal form of a generated constant for
> > a
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to simon from comment #6)
> (In reply to simon from comment #1)
> > Further:
> >
> > $ GNAT_FILE_NAME_CASE_SENSITIVE=1 gnatmake -c p*.ads
> > gcc -c páck3.ads
> > páck3.ads:1:10: warning: file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31485
--- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630011.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55923
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630011.html
From: Andrew Pinski
The problem here is after r6-7425-ga9fee7cdc3c62d0e51730,
the comparison to see if the transformation could be done was using the
wrong value. Instead of see if the inner was LE (for MIN and GE for MAX)
the outer value, it was comparing the inner to the value used in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
/workspaces/booxy/main.cpp: In function ‘boost::asio::awaitable
make(boost::asio::any_io_executor)’:
/workspaces/booxy/main.cpp:19:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
record_type or union_type
Committed as obvious (RE doesn't compile without patch, and I know
what I meant when I wrote it).
commit 5f3da480e7541a9c29d655dccb2463fc5f3cf2c4
Author: Joern Rennecke
Date: Sun Oct 1 22:46:43 2023 +0100
Fix typo in add_options_for_riscv_v, add_options_for_riscv_zfh,
I'll add it to our nightly. Just to be sure I’ll let you know asap it's
status.
Roger, you can always use Synopsys free nsim simulator which you can find it on
Synopsys website.
Thanks,
Claudiu
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2023 1:02 AM
To: Roger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The match pattern which causes the issue:
(simplify
/* signbit(x) -> 0 if x is nonnegative. */
(SIGNBIT tree_expr_nonnegative_p@0)
{ integer_zero_node; })
On 10/1/23 08:26, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
FWIW, I should definitely have caught this hunk earlier -- we've gone the
rounds in this same space (GEN_INT vs gen_int_mode) elsewhere.
Again, sorry for the long wait.
jeff
No worries at all. At least I have learned something new :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
Bug ID: 111655
Summary: wrong code generated for __builtin_signbit on x86-64
-O2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
From: Sergei Trofimovich
r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d519 "Check that passes do not forget to define profile"
exposed check failures in cases when gcc produces uninitialized profile
probabilities. In case of PR/111559 uninitialized profile is generated
by edges executed 0 times reported by IPA profile:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111656
Bug ID: 111656
Summary: Recent build failure with clang
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Committed to trunk, thanks Feng :)
Hmm, my nightly FreeBSD 12 tester now fails as follows:
nawk -f /scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/opt-functions.awk \
-f /scratch/tmp/gerald/GCC-HEAD/gcc/opt-read.awk \
-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
Bug ID: 111657
Summary: Memory copy with structure assignment from named
address space is not working
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
Warn about the following:
char s[3] = "foo";
Initializing a char array with a string literal of the same length as
the size of the array is usually a mistake. Rarely is the case where
one wants to create a non-terminated character sequence from a string
literal.
In some cases, for writing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111648
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110386
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5fa95a3569f6ee66697876a3a380fef1b333f3d
commit r13-7927-gb5fa95a3569f6ee66697876a3a380fef1b333f3d
Author: Andrew Pinski
From: Andrew Pinski
The issue here is that when backprop tries to go
and strip sign ops, it skips over ABSU_EXPR but
ABSU_EXPR not only does an ABS, it also changes the
type to unsigned.
Since strip_sign_op_1 is only supposed to strip off
sign changing operands and not ones that change types,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111650
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Reduced a bit more.
---
module object;
ref V require(K, V)(ref V[K] aa, K key, lazy V value);
struct Root
{
ulong[3] f;
}
Root[ulong] roots;
Root getRoot(int fd, ulong rootID)
{
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111656
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
From: Frederik Harwath
This patch adds support for the OMP_LOOP_TRANS tree node, internal
OpenMP clauses representing loop transformations, and the
omp_transform_loops pass to lower them.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (OBJS): Add omp-transform-loops.o.
* gimple-pretty-print.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert ---
> I am thinking this is all under specified really ...
Although it is indeed unspecified whether 0.0/0.0 yields -NaN or +NaN, it is
well understood that negating a floating point value flips its sign bit. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
--- Comment #45 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
I confirm that I no longer have this problem with
> gcc-12 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-12
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/lto-wrapper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #20 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #14)
> This is just the same as other unspecified things like converting an
> out-of-range value from floating-point to integer.
No, because when GCC's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hwang Joonhyung from comment #0)
> It took more than 30 minutes when I compiled testcase.cc with g++ 14.0.0
> 20231001 on Debian GNU/Linux 12 with -std=gnu++2a (or gnu++20, c++2a, c++20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111642
--- Comment #14 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #13)
> Created attachment 56023 [details]
> Tentative fix
Re " That now triggers a warning
in some configurations, since the NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS>1 tests
Hi, Tobias,
Sorry for the late reply.
I has been on vacation after Cauldron, and will be back to work in the mid of
Oct. will look at this issue at that time.
Qing
> On Sep 25, 2023, at 2:24 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I stumbled over this as I found the wording in the release
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111642
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao ---
30 minutes.
It took more than 30 minutes when I compiled testcase.cc with g++ 14.0.0
20231001 on Debian GNU/Linux 12 with -std=gnu++2a (or gnu++20, c++2a, c++20).
I guess it is a regression because it finishes within 0.1 second with g++
13.2.0 or 12.3.0.
The testcase is based on GetOneCharToken() of V8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #1 from Hwang Joonhyung ---
Created attachment 56025
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56025=edit
It took 138 seconds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #2 from Hwang Joonhyung ---
Created attachment 56026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56026=edit
It took 70 seconds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #4 from Hwang Joonhyung ---
I can see the time spent changes exponentially when I change the number of
ternary operators in the constexpr function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #10 from Hwang Joonhyung ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Note for non-C++11 constexpr, using switch here would most likely be better .
Thank you for the comment. It helped me to solve my problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110869
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111659
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111659
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is:
It is more effective when -ftree-vrp is active (the default for -O2 and above)
but a subset of instances are issued even without optimization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111651
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #3 from Hwang Joonhyung ---
Created attachment 56027
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56027=edit
It took 36 seconds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for non-C++11 constexpr, using switch here would most likely be better .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
Add proper hints for implicit declaration of strerror.
The results could be confusing depending on the other included headers.
These example messages are from compiling a trivial program to print the
string for an errno value. It only includes stdio.h (cstdio for C++).
Before:
$
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 15:06, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 8/15/23 03:16, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> > The new patch looks reasonable to me now. Thanks for fixing it.
> >
> > Could you append testcase after finishing test infrastructure ?
> > I prefer this patch with testcase after infrastructure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111642
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111659
Bug ID: 111659
Summary: document that -Wstrict-flex-arrays depends on
-ftree-vrp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
38.25% cc1plus cc1plus [.] walk_tree_1
34.60% cc1plus cc1plus [.] cp_fold_immediate_r
20.08% cc1plus cc1plus [.] cp_walk_subtrees
Hi Gerald:
Thanks for reporting this issue, I just realized multidimensional
arrays are gawk extensions, could you try the attached patch to see if
it can resolve the issue?
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:56 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2023, Kito Cheng wrote:
> > Committed to trunk,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110864
Bug 110864 depends on bug 110867, which changed state.
Bug 110867 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in combine after
7cdd0860949c6c3232e6cff1d7ca37bb5234074c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110869
Bug 110869 depends on bug 110867, which changed state.
Bug 110867 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in combine after
7cdd0860949c6c3232e6cff1d7ca37bb5234074c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110867
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
On Mon, 2023-10-02 10:55:25 +0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi Gerald:
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue, I just realized multidimensional
> arrays are gawk extensions, could you try the attached patch to see if
> it can resolve the issue?
With your new patch, it works for me again using `mawk`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Paul Eggert from comment #5)
> > The match pattern which causes the issue:
> > (simplify
> > /* signbit(x) -> 0 if x is nonnegative. */
> > (SIGNBIT tree_expr_nonnegative_p@0)
> > {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
What I am trying to say in comment #3 is both GCC and clang's constant folding
is different from what the instruction divsd does in the end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111658
Bug ID: 111658
Summary: test-function-bodies fails to find functions with
single-letter names
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660
--- Comment #9 from Hwang Joonhyung ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Hwang Joonhyung from comment #0)
> > It took more than 30 minutes when I compiled testcase.cc with g++ 14.0.0
> > 20231001 on Debi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939
--- Comment #13 from Xi Ruoyao ---
The patch is pushed. I'm running a bootstrap and I'll close this PR after it
successes.
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
