Please enable Launchpad account: https://launchpad.net/~seotaewong40
--
Tae-Wong Seo
Korea, Republic of
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20131221 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20131221/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
--- Comment #8 from davidxl at google dot com ---
Created attachment 31495
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31495action=edit
Patch file : cleanup + more predicate simplification rules
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59569
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49226
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 31497
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31497action=edit
attempt to avoid invalid hard regs
This patch uses the equivalent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59419
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The modified test gfortran.dg/open_negative_unit_1.f90 in the patch submitted
at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-12/msg00124.html checks that this PR is
fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49226
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59572
Bug ID: 59572
Summary: Not clear error message in smallest_mode_for_size in
handled case
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54793
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Backtrace (patched tree):
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
gfc_resolve_expr (e=0x141e1f7a0) at ../../work/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:2827
2827 if (sym
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58861
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58171
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
--- Comment #10 from davidxl at google dot com ---
My patch does this.
1) it first does aggressive simplification iteratively (more rules can be added
later).
2) it then does normalization by building up larger predicate trees by
following ud
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59569
Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44482
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59369
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdavis at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With the test in comment 1, I get on x86_64-apple-darwin13:
TYPE(atomic_kind_type), pointer :: atomic_kind
1
Error: Derived type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Backtrace is
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
error_print(const char *, const char *, typedef __va_list_tag __va_list_tag *)
(type=optimized out,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
--- Comment #11 from davidxl at google dot com ---
The false negative bug introduced in the patch is fixed. Will submit the patch
for review soon.
(In reply to davidxl from comment #10)
My patch does this.
1) it first does aggressive
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47901
Samuel Bronson naesten at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naesten at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59069
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928
--- Comment #9 from Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I completely support closing this PR with a note in the documentation.
On shared memory mini computers of a bygone era, it was common to map the
common blocks to a specific memory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58842
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43849
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
Tell me, why was your patch never applied?
You answered that question at the next line. ;-)
As far as I can see, nobody even
reviewed it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49226
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47608
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|{x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59531
--- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net ---
Also, we should throw when pos size() rather than pos = size().
Spinning new patches and testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59573
Bug ID: 59573
Summary: aarch64: commit 07ca5686e64 broken glibc-2.17
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59574
Bug ID: 59574
Summary: Bad -Wattributes: ignoring attributes applied after
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
Bug ID: 59575
Summary: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2239
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59576
Bug ID: 59576
Summary: sorry, unimplemented: making multiple clones error
on *-apple-darwin*
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
thanks.
David
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Committed documentation as r206161. Sorry about the delay.
Thanks,
Sharad
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad
the below patch adds support for powerpc64 FreeBSD for the boehm-gc.
The diff is already available in boehm-gc trunk.
Ok for gcc trunk?
* include/private/gcconfig.h: Add FreeBSD powerpc64 defines.
If the patch is in the upstream boehm-gc repository, then backporting
it to GCC is okay.
Thanks,
On 12/20/2013 10:15 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Ok for gcc trunk?
OK, thanks.
Andrew.
43 matches
Mail list logo