> On 3 Dec 2021, at 03:12, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/22/2021 7:49 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
>> Hi all, apologies for forgetting to add the cover letter.
> No worries. I'd already assumed this was to support aarch64 trampolines on
> darwin by having them live elsewere as managed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87282
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Dup of bug 78173.
I should say this was fixed in GCC 11+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78173
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||delrieutheo at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86619
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I Noticed clang, ICC nor MSVC either handle this either.
Note GCC is the only one which handles :
int f(std::array & a, std::array & b)
{
a[0] = 1;
b[0] = 1;
return a[0];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103531
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> -Wtraditional-conversion catches this:
Well... you're technically right, but:
1. That is a much wider warning. If someone were to turn this on they would get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
On 01.12.21 21:54, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran wrote:
Inside of libgfortran, I think it should depend on some macro defined
in libgfortran.h.
#if defined(__powerpc64__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ \
&& defined __GLIBC_PREREQ && __GLIBC_PREREQ (2, 32)
then
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86598
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a full testcase that still fails:
template struct Units{int operator+(int);};
class Amp{};
Units operator"" _amp(unsigned long long d);
int k = 4_amp+1; // incorrect error: no literal operator ""
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23827
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Compilation failure when|[c++98] Compilation failure
Hi GCC community,
This patch will add the missed pattern described in bug 103514 [1] to the
match.pd. Tested on x86_64 Linux.
tree-optimization/103514 Missing XOR-EQ-AND Optimization
* match.pd (a & b) == (a ^ b) -> !(a | b): New optimization.
* match.pd (a & b) ^ (a == b) ->
I'm very sorry there seems to be encoding issue in the attachment
in my last email. Attached is the new patch.
Thanks,
Di Zhao
> -Original Message-
> From: Di Zhao OS
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 1:24 AM
> To: 'Richard Biener'
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-03
Hi,
Jeff Law wrote:
> So what doesn't make sense here is how both stddef.h files get
> included. That's the core problem I think you need to resolve.
The libgo/sysinfo.c file includes stddef.h (for which the GCC version in
ginclude is used on my system) and stdlib.h which, on musl, causes an
Hi:
> Please also consider TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC and
> TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_FROM_VEC.
Here's updated patch.
Also honor TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO/FROM_VEC and in
preferred_{,out_}reload_class.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32\ -march=k8,\ -march=k8}.
Ok?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72777
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61457
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Inaccurately refusing |[C++11/14 only]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60551
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|__attribute__((used)) is|__attribute__((unused)) is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103028
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
This will probably avoid the error. valid_insn_p checks the alternatives, and
fails for the invalid cmpdi_ccu that we attempt to create. Conceivably, this
could be avoided by narrowing down the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98939
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think this paper applies to C++20 too or at least part of it.
>From CWG1291:
[Accepted at the November, 2020 meeting as part of paper P1787R6 and moved to
DR at the February, 2021 meeting.]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69701
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1291
[Accepted at the November, 2020 meeting as part of paper P1787R6 and moved to
DR at the February, 2021 meeting.]
So there is a defect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Skip renaming if instruction is noop move, and it will
been removed for performance.
gcc/
* regrename.c (find_rename_reg): Return satisfied regno
if instruction is noop move.
---
gcc/regrename.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/regrename.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69701
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
ICC also rejects this for the same reason as GCC while both MSVC and clang
accept it. Maybe there is a defect report about this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103028
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #4)
> Andrew,
>
> asm("":"=g"(tt):"g"(t));
> asm("":"=g"(ii):"g"(i));
>
> Make it "0" for the inputs:
>
> asm("":"=g"(tt):"0"(t));
Oh yes sorry I did make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103028
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Andrew,
asm("":"=g"(tt):"g"(t));
asm("":"=g"(ii):"g"(i));
Make it "0" for the inputs:
asm("":"=g"(tt):"0"(t));
and AFAICT if you "detach" the immediate constant, you won't get the bug.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103531
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68699
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48850
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Hi Segher,
Thanks for the review!
on 2021/11/30 上午12:57, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 02:55:51PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> This patch is to fix the inconsistent behaviors for non-LTO mode
>> and LTO mode. As Martin pointed out, currently the function
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57239
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang accepts the reduced testcase in comment #1 but MSVC and ICC both reject
it too.
MSVC:
(18): error C3201: the template parameter list for class template 'Foo'
does not match the template parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Skip renaming if instruction is noop move, and it will
been removed for performance.
gcc/
* regrename.c (find_rename_reg): Return satisfied regno
if instruction is noop move.
---
gcc/regrename.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/regrename.c
Hi Mike,
on 2021/12/3 上午8:51, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:57:12AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Why are there OPTION_MASKs for separate P10 fusion types here, as well as
>> MASK_P10_FUSION?
>
> Well going back in time, before we used rs6000_isa_flags, we used the
On 11/24/2021 7:16 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
When the optional size-index argument to attribute index is
omitted for a pointer, GCC expects the actual pointer argument
to point to an object at least as big as its size implies, or
at least one byte for void*. This is done to
On 11/22/2021 4:54 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
In an effort to avoid false positives while still detecting
certain out-of-bounds accesses the warning code that handles
PHI nodes chooses the operand with the most space remaining
as the one representative of the PHI. That's not
On 11/13/2021 2:45 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
Implement the __builtin_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} functions
for the aarch64-linux platform. This serves to exercise the
infrastructure added in libgcc (--enable-off-stack-trampolines) and
gcc (-foff-stack-trampolines) in supporting off-stack
On 11/13/2021 2:45 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
Implement the __builtin_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} functions
for the x86_64-linux platform. This serves to exercise the
infrastructure added in libgcc (--enable-off-stack-trampolines) and
gcc (-foff-stack-trampolines) in supporting off-stack
On 11/13/2021 2:45 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
Add support for allocating nested function trampolines on an
executable heap rather than on the stack. This is motivated by targets
such as AArch64 Darwin, which globally prohibit executing code on the
stack.
The target-specific routines for
On 11/22/2021 7:49 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
Hi all, apologies for forgetting to add the cover letter.
No worries. I'd already assumed this was to support aarch64 trampolines
on darwin by having them live elsewere as managed entities.
The motivation of this work is to provide (limited)
On 10/28/2021 10:41 AM, Richard Purdie via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 22:56 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:03 +0100
Richard Purdie via Gcc-patches wrote:
OpenEmbedded/Yocto Project builds libgcc and the other gcc runtime libraries
separately
On 10/28/2021 10:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 08:51 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/27/2021 2:05 PM, Richard Purdie via Gcc-patches wrote:
OpenEmbedded/Yocto Project builds libgcc and the other gcc runtime libraries
separately from the compiler and slightly differently to
On 10/27/2021 2:05 PM, Richard Purdie via Gcc-patches wrote:
When building in longer build paths (200+ characters), the
"echo $(PLUGIN_HEADERS)" from the install-plugins target would cause an
"argument list too long error" on some systems.
Avoid this by calling make's sort function on the
On 6/7/2021 1:30 AM, Matt Jacobson via Gcc-patches wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-06-07 Matt Jacobson
* config.gcc: For the AVR target, populate TM_MULTILIB_CONFIG.
* config/avr/genmultilib.awk: Add ability to filter generated multilib
list.
* config/avr/t-avr:
When a basic block A has been annotated with a count and it has only one
successor (or predecessor) B, we can propagate the A's count to B.
The algorithm without this change could leave B without an annotation if B had
other unannotated predecessors (or successors). For example, in the test case I
On 10/11/2021 4:42 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
MIPS release 6 requires the lw/ld/sw/sd can work with
unaligned address, while it can be implemented by
full hardware or trap
Since it doesn't have to be fully done by hardware, we add a
pair of options -m(no-)unaligned-access. Kernels may need them.
On 7/6/2021 5:47 AM, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 7:10 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
1. On some targets, like PowerPC, reference to ifunc function resolver
must be non-local so that compiler will properly emit PLT call. Add
TARGET_IFUNC_REF_LOCAL_OK to allow binding indirect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 63217, which changed state.
Bug 63217 Summary: template conversion operator returning const reference not
used for conversion in some cases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Other related ones:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#493
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#322
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||94404
Alias|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
ICC also rejects this for the same reason as GCC.
MSVC and clang both accept it though.
Could there be a defect report for this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vz at quantitativesystems dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79035
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79035
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
ICC also rejects this for the same reason as GCC.
MSVC and clang both accept it though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102647
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103536
Bug ID: 103536
Summary: Suboptimal codegen for && and || combination.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0, 9.1.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71755
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:57:12AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Why are there OPTION_MASKs for separate P10 fusion types here, as well as
> MASK_P10_FUSION?
Well going back in time, before we used rs6000_isa_flags, we used the default
flag word for MASK arguments. Unfortunately, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-03
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Anders Granlund from comment #4)
> I'm pulling in this test case from my related bug report.
>
> int x = 1;
>
> int main() {
> extern int x;
> using ::x;
> }
This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61587
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, the warning does disappear when malloc() and free() are used instead of
operator new and delete. foo() also ends up much better optimized, even at
-O1:
__attribute__((abi_tag ("cxx11")))
struct string
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 04:12:08PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This patch adds a new effective-target function that tests whether
> it is safe to emit the ROP-protect instructions and updates the
> ROP test cases to use it.
>
> Segher, as we discussed offline, this uses the double [] which
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, at 00:07, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Eddy,
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 07:35:17PM +0200, Eduard-Mihai Burtescu wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021, at 19:17, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> > Rust v0 symbols can have a .suffix because if compiler transformations.
>>
>> For some context, the
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:16:27PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/1/21 10:16, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > In r11-4758, I tried to fix this problem:
> >
> >int & = 0;
> >decltype(auto) j = i; // should behave like int & = i; error
> >
> > wherein do_auto_deduction was getting confused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103530
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE);
This assert is incorrect because useless_type_conversion_p has the following
code:
/* If both the inner and outer types are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I also noticed that with -std=c++17 (or before), the constructor for
> std::string is not inlined fully for both std::string objects which avoids
> the false
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 06:58:36AM +1100, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 04:17, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > * rust-demangle.c (rust_demangle_callback): Ignore everything
> > after '.' char in sym for v0.
> >
>
> I just applied this change to Valgrind's
Hi!
I discovered this bug while working on patches to remove the old built-ins
infrastructure. I missed a spot in converting from the rs6000_builtins enum to
the rs6000_gen_builtins enum. This fixes it. The fix is technically not right
if new_builtins_are_enabled were to be set to zero, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jengelh at inai dot de
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103535
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
Snapshot gcc-9-20211202 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20211202/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103535
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:43:24AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> The new built-in infrastructure is now enabled!
Congratulations, and thanks for all the work!
Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #17 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.c b/gcc/internal-fn.c
> index 6ac3460d538..08f94b7a17a 100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.c
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.c
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103535
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103535
Bug ID: 103535
Summary: [missed optimization] remainder-of-2 with subtract-1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:45 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> So the problem here is that arm_md_asm_adjust would
> just create a set directly to the output memory which is wrong.
> It needs to output to a temp register first and then do a
> move.
>
> OK?
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:55 PM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> The problem here is that aarch64_expand_setmem does not change the alignment
> for strict alignment case. This is a simplified patch from what I had
> previously.
> So constraining copy_limit to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
1 - 100 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
