https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, it is slow. Five sequential dependent integer instructions instead of
one load instruction. Depending on how you benchmark this you possibly won't
see the slowness, the values are stored to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103872
Bug ID: 103872
Summary: testcase fail in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr103526.c on
riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
Going to finish reducing the testcase using valgrind since it is an use after
free bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
==20277== Invalid write of size 8
==20277==at 0xB1C11C: name_lookup::search_unqualified(tree_node*,
cp_binding_level*) (in
/home/apinski/upstream-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/cc1plus)
-原始邮件-
发件人: "Palmer Dabbelt"
发送时间: 2021-12-31 00:59:08 (星期五)
收件人: jeffreya...@gmail.com
抄送: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jia...@iscas.ac.cn, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
indu.bha...@oracle.com, kito.ch...@sifive.com, yul...@nj.iscas.ac.cn,
si...@isrc.iscas.ac.cn, shi...@iscas.ac.cn
主题:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #17 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
One thing, I'm wondering, is if it is really 'slow' using instructions to build
the const (even with 5 insns).
For example, there seems no big difference in runtime between the below two
pieces of code on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24016
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #16 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Thanks, Alan!
I saw your patches in this PR. They would help us to get the sequence of what
we are thinking. And as you said in the comments: it is a big problem for
fixing insn and rtl cost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
Zhao Wei Liew changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52097|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
--- Comment #4 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
Comment on attachment 52097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52097
Optimization for both unsigned and signed integer X
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
--- Comment #3 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
Comment on attachment 52097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52097
Optimization for both unsigned and signed integer X
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
Zhao Wei Liew changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52091|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
--- Comment #1 from Egor Pugin ---
11.2.1 fails
g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 11.2.1 20211203 (Red Hat 11.2.1-7)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
Bug ID: 103871
Summary: [11.2.1/12 Regression] co_await causes build error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #7 from shorne at gmail dot com ---
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 09:59:57PM +, shorne at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
>
> --- Comment #6 from shorne at gmail dot com ---
> Ok, let me have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103862
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103810
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Note also that there is a proposal for C23 (N2854) to allow such
functions, including changing the requirements on va_start to make it
possible to read their arguments.
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Since FLT_EVAL_METHOD only accepts negative value, 0, 1 or 2.
>
> gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c/100854
> * c-common.c (excess_precision_mode_join): Return
> FLT_EVAL_METHOD_PROMOTE_TO_FLOAT when both x and y are
>
Snapshot gcc-9-20211230 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20211230/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870
--- Comment #1 from Petro Karashchenko ---
I would expect "bgt" instruction instead of "bne" in such case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870
Bug ID: 103870
Summary: ARM: Wrong branch instruction with optimization O2 and
higher
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #6 from shorne at gmail dot com ---
Ok, let me have a look.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 5:34 AM giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
>
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |c++
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
Rereducing via PR 100129 so I don't hit the hash-table-verification issue
(which is not modules related) but rather try to find the GC issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103756
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c684aa50d4eef28bb59ebb4664f362662845cd6
commit r12-6156-g6c684aa50d4eef28bb59ebb4664f362662845cd6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5545d1edcbdb1701443f94dde7ec97c5ce3e1a6c
commit r12-6155-g5545d1edcbdb1701443f94dde7ec97c5ce3e1a6c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Noble ---
> Yes, and even with that fixed, more checks for $is_hosted are needed for
> stdint.h types. I have a patch for that too, but I'm not happy with it yet.
I'm willing to test out patches if you need. In
> On 28 Dec 2021, at 17:38, Jeff Law wrote:
>> gcc/
>> * gcc.c (driver_handle_option): do_save --sysroot.
> OK.
Thanks for the prompt review Jeff!
I have another simple one coming :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti ---
Dear Stafford,
here we go again, after updating libgeos to version 3.10.1 the same bug shows
up. This happens with libgeos but not with protobuf that is fixed. I'm sure
i pass -mcmodel=large.
Can you help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77465
--- Comment #3 from Ed Catmur ---
Sent patches to mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587495.html
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/conversion/explicit2.C: New test.
* g++.dg/conversion/explicit3.C: New test.
0003-Add-tests-verifying-conformance-to-explicit.patch
Description: Binary data
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.c (reference_binding):
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-union.C:
* g++.dg/warn/Wstrict-aliasing-5.C:
* g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rvalue3.C:
* g++.dg/conversion/explicit1.C: New test.
PR c++/77465 - [DR909] rejected C-style cast involving casting away constness
from result of conversion operator
PR c++/77465
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.c (tourney):
(joust):
(build_user_type_conversion_1):
(reference_binding):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103869
Bug ID: 103869
Summary: better diagnostics surrounding uses of -fms-extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, documentation
This patch series improves conformance to the C++ standard for C-style casts
(explicit cast notation, [expr.cast]) in two scenarios.
First, as discussed in CWG 909 [1], a C-style cast may invoke a user-defined
conversion (as a static_cast) followed by a const_cast; currently this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I thought I had a fix for this that involved making gfc_is_simply_contiguous
smarter about intrinsics and other function calls, but after writing more test
cases I found that this one still ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Nicolas Noble from comment #6)
> While a bit tangential from the narrow topic of this bug, it may be
> noteworthy that I just tried using the --with-newlib kludge here, and
> compilation
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 07:27:06PM -0600, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu {P10,P9}
> powerpc64-linux-gnu {P8, P7} and X86. OK for master?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR 90323
> * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_context::simplify_binary_operation_1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, FX via Gcc wrote:
> Is it particularly hard to do? I came across a post in the list archives
> from Joseph, who said it would be good to have. I’d be willing to try
> and put something together, unless you think it’s a big project. Any
> pointers as to how to start would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #42 from cqwrteur ---
And std::format shit is an absolute log4j vuln but wg21 wastes time on this
instead of fixing iostream.
LOL.
We see wg21 as a joke.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #41 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #38)
> (In reply to Nicolas Noble from comment #33)
> > At the moment, I don't understand if it's possible to spawn a cross compiler
> > with a freestanding libc and
Hi Joseph,
> fixincludes is the right place for a fix for this issue. There is a
> plausible case for having an architecture-independent
> __FLT_EVAL_METHOD___ macro that takes only values defined by
> C99 (regardless of -fpermitted-flt-eval-methods), rather than using the
> new C23 values
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021, Hongtao Liu via Gcc wrote:
> gcc define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ according to
>
> builtin_define_with_int_value ("__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__",
> c_flt_eval_method (true));
>
> and guess we need to handle things like:
>
>/* GCC only supports one interchange type right now,
On 12/30/2021 9:43 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Hi, Jeff
Is the revised patch from Clement okay?
I *think* so. I don't think it's likely to affect any other system as
a host, build or target. I'm not entirely sure it's right for canadian
crosses to/from involving aix, but that seems like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
Nicolas Noble changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pi...@nobis-crew.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103854
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644
--- Comment #15 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Created attachment 52094
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52094=edit
Tentative patch, adding IEEE_FMA and IEEE_SIGNBIT
I am attaching a tentative patch for the issue. I also
Ping.
On 11/22/21 1:38 PM, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Updated version of the patch. Changes made from original are updated
> commentary to hopefully aid readability, no functional changes.
>
>
> Implement more two insn constants. rotate_and_mask_constant covers
> 64-bit constants
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 09:22:51AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/28/2021 6:27 PM, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > PR 90323
> > * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_context::simplify_binary_operation_1):
> > Relax
> > C from constant to constant or reg.
> >
>
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:28:34 PST (-0800), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
On 12/29/2021 8:02 PM, jiawei wrote:
Add -msmall-data-limit option to put global and static data into right
section and generate 'btt_info' on RISC-V target.
BTF (BPF Type Format) is the metadata format which encodes
Hi, Jeff
Is the revised patch from Clement okay?
Thanks, David
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:59 AM CHIGOT, CLEMENT wrote:
>
> >>> So my worry here is this is really a host property -- ie, this is
> >>> behavior of where GCC runs, not the target for which GCC is generating
> >>> code.
> >>>
> >>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
On 12/16/2021 3:40 AM, lsix--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Lancelot SIX
Currently libiberty fails to demangle the name of cloned functions if
the clone-type-identifier contains numbers.
This can be observed with the following example:
$ cat > ex.cc
On 12/29/2021 3:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The r12-5978 change caused a -fcompare-debug issue, because without
-g a chain might start with a noop move, but with -g there could be
one or more DEBUG_INSNs in the chain before the noop move and so
regrename could make different decisions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95454
Eric Estievenart changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve+gcc at tecwec dot eu
---
On 12/30/2021 9:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 09:22:51AM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 12/28/2021 6:27 PM, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu {P10,P9}
powerpc64-linux-gnu {P8, P7} and X86. OK for master?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
On 12/29/2021 8:02 PM, jiawei wrote:
Add -msmall-data-limit option to put global and static data into right
section and generate 'btt_info' on RISC-V target.
BTF (BPF Type Format) is the metadata format which encodes the debug info
related to BPF program/map, more details on:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 09:22:51AM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 12/28/2021 6:27 PM, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu {P10,P9}
> > powerpc64-linux-gnu {P8, P7} and X86. OK for master?
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > PR
On 12/30/2021 2:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi!
In the following testcase we incorrectly error about pasting / token
with padding token (which is a result of __VA_OPT__); instead we should
like e.g. for ##arg where arg is empty macro argument clear PASTE_LEFT
flag of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
On 12/28/2021 6:27 PM, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu {P10,P9}
powerpc64-linux-gnu {P8, P7} and X86. OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR 90323
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_context::simplify_binary_operation_1): Relax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
Bug 99861 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is actually a dup of bug 103769.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103769 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase that reproduces even with current trunk (started also with r12-2132):
// PR c++/101597
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-O2 -Warray-bounds" }
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
struct S { virtual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC, ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99722, which changed state.
Bug 99722 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99722, which changed state.
Bug 99722 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 99722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
Bug 100129 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99948
Bug 99948 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
Bug 99722 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
Bug 99479 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 99861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
Bug 99861 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100129, which changed state.
Bug 100129 Summary: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 100129, which changed state.
Bug 100129 Summary: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 100129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99737, which changed state.
Bug 99737 Summary: [modules] malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99737
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99737, which changed state.
Bug 99737 Summary: [modules] malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99737
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 99737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
--- Comment #1 from ashenglandelbro at protonmail dot com ---
Created attachment 52092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52092=edit
.ii for the file that failed to compile
Compressed as an xz as the raw text is 8mb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
Bug ID: 103868
Summary: ICE at end of coroutine when using asio
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
