https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105213
Bug ID: 105213
Summary: Extend __builtin_{un,}pack_{longdouble,ibm128} valid
for soft-float
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
URL:
Hi,
On 9/4/2022 上午 3:36, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:17:27AM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
>> This patch corrects the match pattern in pr56605.c. The former pattern
>> is wrong and test case fails with GCC11. It should match following insn on
>> each subtarget
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105033
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 52776
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52776=edit
Patch pending for GCC13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
on 2022/4/8 10:34 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for investigating.
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:25:51PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> on 2022/4/8 3:29 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 09:19:51AM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 13:37
builtin-arith-overflow-3 has been failing on bfin-elf for a while. I've
had a workaround installed on the tester for a few months and I finally
got some time to dig into it over the weekend.
Ultimately I was able to nail the problem down to the representation of
the rotate left by one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ac111372ecb73cc2464ab27e3bad75dfe88a34b
commit r12-8075-g3ac111372ecb73cc2464ab27e3bad75dfe88a34b
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Sun Apr
Hi,
On 9/4/2022 上午 12:48, will schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 11:17 +0800, HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch corrects the match pattern in pr56605.c. The former pattern
>> is wrong and test case fails with GCC11. It should match following insn on
>> each subtarget
Hi,
the testcase triggers ICE since computation overflows on two accesses
that are very far away d->b[-144115188075855873] and d->b[144678138029277184].
This patch makes the relevant part of modref to use poly_offset_int.
It is kind of weird to store bit offsets into poly_int64 but it is what
Snapshot gcc-12-20220410 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20220410/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> > > It seems that recent gcc trunk can't detect set-but-not-used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105212
Bug ID: 105212
Summary: -gnatwu gives false error message for certain arrays.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 87983, which changed state.
Bug 87983 Summary: Feature: Add a warning when case labels from a different
enum than the one in switch(EXPR) are used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87983
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87404
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avarab at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87983
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |gcov-profile
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105211
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
h-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-8072-20220410001634-g71cac7de8f1-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220410 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
It seems that recent gcc trunk can't detect set-but-not-used in this code:
extern int g( int);
void f( int m)
{
int n;
n = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
It would appear that clang trunk is better at finding set-but-not-used
variables than gcc.
Here are some more cases:
./../trunk.git/gcc/genautomata.cc:5664:7: warning: variable 'alts_number' set
but not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105210
Bug ID: 105210
Summary: gcc/auto-profile.cc:391:11: warning: variable 'level'
set but not used
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
Bug ID: 105209
Summary: internal compiler error: in store_data_bypass_p_1
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105208
Bug ID: 105208
Summary: incorrect -Wunused-but-set-variable for static const
variables used in const expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Dear Sir/Ma'am I beginners in coding but has lot's of interest in working
with people like you and learning new skills as much as possible. I had a
idea that why not "make a simple interface for user to create there own
library and import them". This will attract more new coders so that they
can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus |[7,8,9,10,F95] Bogus error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdaa6de39a5da45dccd06c18dd355893b4cf9060
commit r11-9806-gfdaa6de39a5da45dccd06c18dd355893b4cf9060
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4e07251c685430e00d6b3f3dee41012c41ca26
commit r11-9805-g6b4e07251c685430e00d6b3f3dee41012c41ca26
Author: Mikael Morin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104570
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4e07251c685430e00d6b3f3dee41012c41ca26
commit r11-9805-g6b4e07251c685430e00d6b3f3dee41012c41ca26
Author: Mikael Morin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b0f715744d7919ee729d370155a68d5fa97cba9
commit r11-9804-g3b0f715744d7919ee729d370155a68d5fa97cba9
Author: Mikael Morin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54c5e064cc3dc3c9b3dff12b6d48dc3efd482b07
commit r12-8073-g54c5e064cc3dc3c9b3dff12b6d48dc3efd482b07
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101527
--- Comment #4 from 康桓瑋 ---
MSVC has fixed this issue through
https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2066/commits.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, YunQiang Su wrote:
> If MIPS MCU extension is enable, the IPL section in Cause and Status
> registers has been expand to 8bit instead of 6bit.
>
> In Cause: the bits are 10-17.
> In Status: the bits are 10-16 and 18.
>
> MD00834-2B-MUCON-AFP-01.03.pdf: P49 and P61.
I can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105031
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105031
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Hey, Jonathan, would you mind taking a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105182
--- Comment #18 from Kermit Bunde ---
The latest GIT pull fixed the issue
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file,
Hi Harald,
Regtested again with no new failures. OK for mainline?
Looks good to me. Thanks for the patch!
Best regards
Thomas
Hi Harald,
It looks good to me - OK for mainline.
Thanks
Paul
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 21:45, Harald Anlauf via Fortran
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Am 06.04.22 um 22:30 schrieb Harald Anlauf via Fortran:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > the logic for checking the allocate-coshape-spec in an ALLOCATE
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105197
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
42 matches
Mail list logo
