https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Started with r12-398-g5fbe6a8e73b52c6ebc28b9 because r12-397 didn't compile,
> but yes, it is r12-397.
And it is very similar to PR 100810 in the sense there
On Fri, 20 May 2022, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Excerpts from Marc Aurèle La France's message of Mai 20, 2022 6:56 am:
On Tue, 17 May 2022, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2022, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Excerpts from Marc Aurèle La France's message of Mai 17, 2022 5:31 pm:
On Tue, 17 May 2022,
Snapshot gcc-12-20220521 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20220521/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
I'm not sure when that sneaked in (and it predates that last entry),
but followed by is one too many in any case. :-)
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
index
On Wed, 11 May 2022, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
> LGTM, I think document what we really did in GCC 12 is never too late :P
Totally. And thanks for doing this, Palmer.
I went ahead and made two editorial changes per the patch below
which I pushed.
Gerald
commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105683
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is calling the copy constructor (which you missed in your comment):
value(const value& other) noexcept : v{other.v}
{
}
Which is called via:
inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] Infinite|[12/13 Regression] Infinite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105684
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105674
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase, rank 1, no pointer or target needed:
program test
implicit none
integer, dimension(4) :: dim_1 = 42
print*, 'lbound', lbound(dim_1), 'ubound', ubound(dim_1)
print*, ''
PRU has single-cycle constant cost for any jump, and it cannot
vectorise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c: For PRU target, skip the
vectorizing checks in tree dumps.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-2.c:
Committed as obvious.
PR ipa/91088
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/ipa/pr91088.c: Adjust member offset checks to
accommodate targets which pack structures by default.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr91088.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2
Like AVR and Cris, PRU has no alignment requirements. Thus it is
also affected by PR53535.
PR middle-end/53535
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr46647.c: Skip for pru target.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr46647.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
PRU has no condition code and conditional moves.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c: Skip for PRU.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c
If the target uses packed structs by default, there are no trailing
padding bytes allocated. Hence extra warnings are emitted.
Committed as obvious.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-48-novec.c: Add expected warnings
if target packs the structs by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:addacdc87b044e63d72054036907c91a18be6734
commit r13-699-gaddacdc87b044e63d72054036907c91a18be6734
Author: Dimitar Dimitrov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53535
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0380b6575f61e5bd9f428887790716a57dd66488
commit r13-698-g0380b6575f61e5bd9f428887790716a57dd66488
Author: Dimitar Dimitrov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105681
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
This patch simplifies vec_unpack_hi_expr/vec_unpack_lo_expr of a uniform
constructor or vec_duplicate operand. The motivation is from PR 105621
where after optimization, we're left with:
vect_cst__21 = {c_8(D), c_8(D), c_8(D), c_8(D)};
vect_iftmp.7_4 = [vec_unpack_hi_expr] vect_cst__21;
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105686
Bug ID: 105686
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed:
missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 8 with
-fnon-call-exceptions
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Bug ID: 105685
Summary: Still Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=cold` on function
already marked as `__attribute__((cold))`
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
I'd like to ping my patch for PR middle-end/95126 from February:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590949.html
As a regression fix, this has missed GCC 12, but hopefully its suitable
for 13 now we're back in stage1.
The patch has been refreshed and retested against gcc 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105684
Bug ID: 105684
Summary: Bogus `-Warray-bounds` in partially allocated struct
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105683
Bug ID: 105683
Summary: [12 Regression] Infinite loop with construction of
vector of variant
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682
Bug ID: 105682
Summary: Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and
`-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105681
Bug ID: 105681
Summary: libstdc++-v3 fails to build on msp430
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105680
Bug ID: 105680
Summary: undefined type after new does not give a helpful error
message
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
29 matches
Mail list logo
