https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110910
Bug ID: 110910
Summary: weakref should allow incomplete array type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110909
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110909
Bug ID: 110909
Summary: Suboptimal codegen in vector copy assignment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110888
--- Comment #5 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
It is more like this problem:
$ cat foo.c
void foo_(double *x, double *y, double *z)
{
int i;
__builtin_memset(z, 0, 8); /* z[0] = 0.0; */
for (i=0; i<1 ; i++)
z[0] += x[0] * y[0];
}
$ gcc -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager ---
So I'm assuming this is staying open for backports to the 12 and 11 branches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56096
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think one way to improve the constant forming is during isel if we have
condition exec (e.g. arm or ia64) we should transform:
_7 = _1 != 0;
_8 = (int) _7;
_9 = _8 << 3;
to:
_9 = _1 ? 8 : 0;
That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56096
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 7-10 produced:
movwr3, #32896
tst r1, r3
it ne
lsrne r0, r0, #8
bx lr
But GCC 11 produces:
movwr3, #32896
tst r1, r3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70901
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84997
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Optimize integer operations |Optimize integer operations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20514
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
in GCC 13+ we get now (for the testcase in comment #0) at -O3:
```
[local count: 452984831]:
# i_lsm.4_2 = PHI
if (i_lsm.4_2 == 5)
goto ; [25.00%]
else
goto ; [75.00%]
[local count:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80740
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-05-25 00:00:00 |2023-8-4
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 49773, which changed state.
Bug 49773 Summary: use of class data members prevent vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110908
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is most likely the fix:
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 7cd230c4602..4d26c8789ce 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110908
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does LLVM still save/restore LR with -ffixed-x30 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110908
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
Treat the register named reg as a fixed register; generated code should never
refer to it (except perhaps as a stack pointer, frame pointer or in some other
fixed role).
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-01-26 00:00:00 |2023-8-4
--- Comment #20 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110908
Bug ID: 110908
Summary: [aarch64] Internal compiler error when using
-ffixed-x30
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
>> Umm, this patch has been queued up for at least a couple weeks now.
Oh. I am sorry I didn't see this patch since this patch doesn't CC me.
I didn't subscribe GCC-patch, so I may miss some patches that didn't explicitly
CC me.
I just happen to see your reply email today then reply.
>> Testing what specifically? Are you asking for correctness tests,
>> performance/code quality tests?
Add memcpy test using RVV instructions, just like we are adding testcases for
auto-vectorization support.
For example:
#include
#include
#include
void foo (int32_t * a, int32_t * b, int
On 7/20/23 18:59, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
Hi Jeff,
在 2023/7/21 5:27, Jeff Law 写道:
Wouldn't it make more sense to just try rotate/mask in the original mode before
trying a shift in a widened mode? I'm not sure why we need a target hook here.
There is no change to try rotate/mask with the
On 8/4/23 17:10, 钟居哲 wrote:
Could you add testcases for this patch?
Testing what specifically? Are you asking for correctness tests,
performance/code quality tests?
+;; The (use (and (match_dup 1) (const_int 127))) is here to prevent the
+;; optimizers from changing cpymem_loop_* into
Could you add testcases for this patch?
+;; The (use (and (match_dup 1) (const_int 127))) is here to prevent the
+;; optimizers from changing cpymem_loop_* into this.
+(define_insn "@cpymem_straight"
+ [(set (mem:BLK (match_operand:P 0 "register_operand" "r,r"))
+ (mem:BLK (match_operand:P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110905
--- Comment #4 from danakj at orodu dot net ---
Ok it only happens if the VecIntoIter class has a base class, even when it's
empty the bug reproduces. But when I remove the IteratorBase base class, then
GCC compiles it correctly.
It's getting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57650
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I have seen differences like this due to just different FREE_SSANAMES
happening too.
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 18:42 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 16:48 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 11:39 AM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 11:02 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> > > > Hi Dave,
> > > >
> > > > Tests related to our plugin
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 16:48 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 11:39 AM David Malcolm
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 11:02 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > Tests related to our plugin which depend on Python-specific
> > > definitions have been run by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57650
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Snapshot gcc-12-20230804 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20230804/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106265
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110905
--- Comment #3 from danakj at orodu dot net ---
Repro down from 37k to under 1000 lines now: https://godbolt.org/z/enMxaqjb6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97225
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
Known to fail|
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Sorry, I hoped it wouldn't take me almost 3 months and would be much shorter
> > as well, but clearly I'm not good at estimating stuff...
>
> Well, it’s definitely feature creep with now the _Decimal and bitfield stuff …
I think
Adds a simplification for ((x ^ y) & z) | x to be folded into
(z & y) | x. Merges this simplification with ((x | y) & z) | x -> (z & y) | x
to prevent duplicate pattern. Tested successfully on x86_64 and x86 targets.
PR tree-opt/109938
gcc/ChangeLog:
* match.pd ((x ^ y) & z) | x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59883
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
On 8/1/23 19:38, Xiao Zeng wrote:
This patch recognizes Zicond patterns when the select pattern
with condition eq or neq to 0 (using eq as an example), namely:
1 rd = (rs2 == 0) ? non-imm : 0
2 rd = (rs2 == 0) ? non-imm : non-imm
3 rd = (rs2 == 0) ? reg : non-imm
4 rd = (rs2 == 0) ? reg : reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110907
Bug ID: 110907
Summary: ICE when using -fanalyzer-verbose-state-changes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110864
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110906
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well "math-errno" has no effect if -fno-math-errno is supplied on the command
line either, well can produce incorrect code too.
Take:
```
__attribute__((optimize("math-errno")))
void g(double x) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110906
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
But even:
```
__attribute__((optimize("no-math-errno")))
double g(double x) {
return __builtin_sqrt(x);
}
```
Does not change here ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110906
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55692
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55692=edit
Full testcase
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed
David Faust as BPF backend reviewer.
Please join me in congratulating David on his new role.
David, please update your listings in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110906
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
well std::sqrt is not annotated with no-math-errno after all ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110906
Bug ID: 110906
Summary: __attribute__((optimize("no-math-errno"))) has no
effect.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On 8/1/23 00:47, Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches wrote:
I'm not against continuing with the more well-known approach for now
but we should keep in mind that might still be potential for improvement.
No. I don't think it's faster.
I did a quick check on my x86 laptop and it's roughly 25%
On 7/17/23 22:47, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Subject:
cpymem for RISCV with v extension
From:
Joern Rennecke
Date:
7/17/23, 22:47
To:
GCC Patches
As discussed on last week's patch call, this patch uses either a
straight copy or an opaque pattern that emits the loop as assembly to
optimize
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 11:39 AM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 11:02 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Tests related to our plugin which depend on Python-specific
> > definitions have been run by including /* { dg-options "-fanalyzer
> > -I/usr/include/python3.9" } */.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110905
--- Comment #2 from danakj at orodu dot net ---
Ah ok. Here's a big reproduction: https://godbolt.org/z/Kj7Tcd6P4
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20230804/include/c++/14.0.0/bits/stl_construct.h:97:14:
in 'constexpr' expansion of
'((sus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
We can vectorize test2 using mask stores
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110426
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This patch makes -fanalyzer make use of the function attribute
"alloc_size", allowing -fanalyzer to emit -Wanalyzer-allocation-size,
-Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds, and -Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size on
execution paths involving allocations using such functions.
Successfully bootstrapped &
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to trunk as r14-3000-g187b213ddbe7ea.
gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
* svalue.cc (region_svalue::dump_to_pp): Support NULL type.
(constant_svalue::dump_to_pp): Likewise.
(initial_svalue::dump_to_pp): Likewise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> For the original testcase in comment #0, with `-O3 -fno-vect-cost-model` GCC
> can vectorize it on aarch64 but not on x86_64.
I should say starting in GCC 6 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110902
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:021077b94741c9300dfff3a24e95b3ffa3f508a7
commit r14-3001-g021077b94741c9300dfff3a24e95b3ffa3f508a7
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110426
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:021077b94741c9300dfff3a24e95b3ffa3f508a7
commit r14-3001-g021077b94741c9300dfff3a24e95b3ffa3f508a7
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
For the original testcase in comment #0, with `-O3 -fno-vect-cost-model` GCC
can vectorize it on aarch64 but not on x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
The testcase in comment #0 started to be vectorized in GCC 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35224
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55691
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55691=edit
testcase
On 8/4/23 03:29, Xiao Zeng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 01:20:00 AM Jeff Law wrote:
In the wrong two optimization modes, I only considered the
case of satisfying the ELSE branch, but in fact, like the correct
two optimization modes, I should consider the case of satisfying
both the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30049
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The only difference I saw is scheduling and some small IV-OPTs difference ...
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
PR C/108896
* c-ubsan.cc (ubsan_instrument_bounds): Use counted_by attribute
information.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR C/108896
* gcc.dg/ubsan/flex-array-counted-by-bounds.c: New test.
*
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR C/108896
* tree-object-size.cc (addr_object_size): Use the counted_by
attribute info.
* tree.cc (component_ref_has_counted_by_p): New function.
(component_ref_get_counted_by): New function.
* tree.h
'counted_by (COUNT)'
The 'counted_by' attribute may be attached to the flexible array
member of a structure. It indicates that the number of the
elements of the array is given by the field named "COUNT" in the
same structure as the flexible array member. GCC uses this
Hi,
This is the 2nd version of the patch, per our discussion based on the
review comments for the 1st version, the major changes in this version
are:
1. change the name "element_count" to "counted_by";
2. change the parameter for the attribute from a STRING to an
Identifier;
3. Add logic and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30049
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55690
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55690=edit
testcase
[apinski@xeond2 upstream-gcc-git]$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc t.c -march=opteron
-ffast-math -funroll-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32806
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55689
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55689=edit
compilable testcase
> On Aug 4, 2023, at 3:09 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-04 15:06, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>> Yes, that's what I'm thinking.
>>>
> so `q` must be pointing to a single element. So you could deduce:
>
> 1. the minimum size of the whole object that q points to.
You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109910
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-04
On 2023-08-04 15:06, Qing Zhao wrote:
Yes, that's what I'm thinking.
so `q` must be pointing to a single element. So you could deduce:
1. the minimum size of the whole object that q points to.
You mean that the TYPE will determine the minimum size of the whole object?
(Does this include
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 10:31 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/3/23 17:38, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
> >> ;-) Actually if you wanted to poke at zicond, the most interesting
> >> unexplored area I've come across is the COND_EXPR handling in gimple.
> >> When we expand a COND_EXPR into
> On Aug 4, 2023, at 12:36 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-04 11:27, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>> On Aug 4, 2023, at 10:40 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2023-08-03 13:34, Qing Zhao wrote:
One thing I need to point out first is, currently, even for regular fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110905
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110905
Bug ID: 110905
Summary: GCC rejects constexpr code that may re-initialize
union member
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-04
Did you ever solve this problem? I'm getting the exact same error.
Hi!
Repost because the patch was too large.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:03:33PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Note that representations with too-large significand are defined to be
> noncanonical representations of zero, so you need to take care of that in
> decoding BID.
Done.
> You could e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nikolasklauser at berlin dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110904
Bug ID: 110904
Summary: __is_convertible incorrectly reports non-referenceable
function prototypes as convertible
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110857
--- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
profiledbootstrap now works on aarch64-linux-gnu, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110903
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the original testcase has some obvious use of an uninitialized variable.
Anyways here is a fixed up testcase which does not have that uninitialized
variable and GCC 13 was able to optimize away the
The patch at the end adds a warning when a tail/sibling call cannot be
optimized for various reasons.
I built and tested GCC with and without the patch with configuration
Configured with: ../../gcc-mainline/configure --enable-languages=c
--disable-multilib --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline
> Am 04.08.2023 um 18:26 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>
> Hello,
>
>> On Wed, Aug 02 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 7:05 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when IPA-SRA detects whether a parameter passed by reference is
>>> written to, it does not special case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110903
Bug ID: 110903
Summary: [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since
r14-1597-g64d90d06d2d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92335
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 95084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 95084, which changed state.
Bug 95084 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] code sinking prevents if-conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95084
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95958
Bug 95958 depends on bug 94442, which changed state.
Bug 94442 Summary: [11/12/13/14 regression] Redundant loads/stores emitted at
-O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110898
Martin Krischik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110901
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
With C code, these use of -march and -mcpu would normally be rejected even.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110901
--- Comment #2 from Khem Raj ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Order matters. In this case -march is after -mcpu ...
It does not seem to be effective in this case. I tried to specify -mcpu after
-march and vice-versa, result is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110901
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Order matters. In this case -march is after -mcpu ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110902
Bug ID: 110902
Summary: Missing cast in region_model_manager::maybe_fold_binop
on MULT_EXPR by 1
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
