On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 9:25 PM Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
>
> On 11/7/23 22:47, Lehua Ding wrote:
> >
> > Lehua Ding (7):
> >ira: Refactor the handling of register conflicts to make it more
> > general
> >ira: Add live_subreg problem and apply to ira pass
> >ira: Support subreg
Ping!
Ok for trunk.
Thanks & Regards
Ajit
Forwarded Message
Subject: [PATCH V15 4/4] ree: Improve ree pass using defined abi interfaces
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:14:17 +0530
From: Ajit Agarwal
To: gcc-patches , Jeff Law ,
Vineet Gupta , Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
CC: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112464
--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp ---
I tested
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index a544bc9b059..257fd40793e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -7084,7 +7084,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3)
> Hmm I rather think PHI ops should handle that null like other passes do. The
> folding is supposed to already test and only happen if it succeeds.
It
Hi Richard,
Thanks so much for your comments.
在 2023/11/9 19:41, Richard Biener 写道:
> I'm not sure if the testcase is valid though?
>
> @defbuiltin{{void} __builtin_return (void *@var{result})}
> This built-in function returns the value described by @var{result} from
> the containing function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91023
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christoph.hoeger@celeraone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91023
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The current ICE is:
```
t.cc:10:11: internal compiler error: tree check: expected type_argument_pack or
nontype_argument_pack, have record_type in unify_pack_expansion, at
cp/pt.cc:23947
0x979320
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91023
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
When I remove all cond_ patterns, it passed bootstrap. continue to
rootcause the exact pattern which cause the bootstrapped failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-10
Ever confirmed|0
The t0 register is used as a temporary register for interrupts, so it needs
special treatment. It is necessary to avoid using "th.ldd" in the interrupt
program to stop the subsequent operation of the t0 register, so they need to
exchange positions in the function "riscv_for_each_saved_reg".
ping!
Forwarded Message
Subject: [PING ^0] [PATCH v2 3/4] Improve functionality of ree pass with
various constants with AND operation.
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 18:28:51 +0530
From: Ajit Agarwal
To: gcc-patches
CC: Jeff Law , Vineet Gupta ,
Richard Biener , Segher Boessenkool
Ping ^2.
On 23/10/23 2:02 pm, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>
>
> Ping ^1.
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: [PING ^0][PATCH v2] rs6000: Add new pass for replacement of
> contiguous addresses vector load lxv with lxvp
> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 17:43:24 +0530
> From: Ajit Agarwal
> To:
Ping
On 03/11/23 1:14 pm, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> Hi Segher,
> I have incorporated changes in the code as per the review comments provided
> by you
> for version 2 of the patch. Please review.
>
> Regards,
> Surya
>
>
> rs6000/p8swap: Fix incorrect lane extraction by vec_extract()
Hello Richard:
On 09/11/23 6:21 pm, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:00 PM Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>
>> tree-ssa-loop-ivopts : Add live analysis in regs used in decision making.
>>
>> Add live anaysis in regs used calculation in decision making of
>> selecting ivopts candidates.
>>
Committed, thanks Juzhe.
Pan
From: juzhe.zhong
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2023 2:32 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Li, Pan2 ; Wang, Yanzhang
; kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support vec_init for trailing same element
lgtm
Replied Message
From
lgtm Replied Message Frompan2...@intel.comDate11/10/2023 14:22 Togcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Ccjuzhe.zh...@rivai.ai,pan2...@intel.com,yanzhang.w...@intel.com,kito.ch...@gmail.comSubject[PATCH v1] RISC-V: Support vec_init for trailing same element
When I'm working on PR112443, I notice there's some misoptimizations:
after we fold _mm{,256}_blendv_epi8/pd/ps into gimple, the backend
fails to combine it back to v{,p}blendv{v,ps,pd} since the pattern is
too complicated, so I think maybe we should hanlde it in the gimple
level.
The dump is
On 11/8/23 09:00, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 14:54, Jeff Law wrote:
... Joern can you post a follow-up manual twiddle so
that other ports can follow your example and avoid this problem?
THanks,
jeff
The attached patch makes the scan-assembler* directives ignore the
Ahh, I should have updated my progress last night after all, it would
have saved us some time. Regardless, it's nice to see we independently
came to the same conclusions.
Side note, would you prefer I compile the lambda and by-value fixes
into a new version of this patch? Or as a separate patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112473
Bug ID: 112473
Summary: integer_sequence accepts non-integer types
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
> > I'm unfortunately going down a rabbit hole again.
> >
> > --function.h:608
> > `/* If pointers to member functions use the least significant bit to
> > indicate whether a function is virtual, ensure a pointer to this function
> > will have that bit clear. */ #define MINIMUM_METHOD_BOUNDARY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112472
Bug ID: 112472
Summary: (trunc)copysign((extend)x, CST) is not optimized to
just copysign(x, CST')
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112471
Bug ID: 112471
Summary: catch handler of type "reference to array" should be
unreachable, but is reached
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
new_stmt = build_call_internal (ifn, res_op);
static gcall *
build_call_internal (internal_fn fn, gimple_match_op *res_op)
{
if (direct_internal_fn_p (fn))
{
tree_pair types =
On 11/6/23 05:24, Richard Sandiford wrote:
decl_attributes and comp_type_attributes both had code that
iterated over one list of attributes and looked for coresponding
attributes in another list. This patch makes those lookups
namespace-aware.
Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu & x86_64-linux-gnu.
On 10/4/23 12:28, Brendan Shanks wrote:
Hi,
This patch implements pex_unix_exec_child using posix_spawn when
available.
This should especially benefit recent macOS (where vfork just calls
fork), but should have equivalent or faster performance on all
platforms.
In addition, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
On 11/9/23 18:57, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi Maxim and Alexander,
Thanks a lot for the review comments!
on 2023/11/10 01:40, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi Kewen,
Below are my comments. I don't want to override Alexander's review, and if
the patch looks
On 11/9/23 10:40, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi Kewen,
Below are my comments. I don't want to override Alexander's review, and if
the patch looks good to him, it's fine to ignore my concerns.
My main concern is that this adds a new entity --
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
Ready push to trunk.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/i386-expand.cc
(ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate): Handle V4HF/V4BF and
V2HF/V2BF.
(ix86_expand_vector_init_one_nonzero): Ditto.
This patch is a small optimization for vector initialization.
Discovered when I am evaluating benchmarks.
Consider this following case:
void foo3 (int8_t *out, int8_t x, int8_t y)
{
v16qi v = {y, y, y, y, y, y, y, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x};
*(v16qi*)out = v;
}
Before this patch:
Although current GCC didn't cause ICE when I create FP16 vec_init case
with -march=rv64gcv (no ZVFH), current vec_init pattern looks wrong.
Since V_VLS FP16 predicate is TARGET_VECTOR_ELEN_FP_16, wheras vec_init
needs vfslide1down/vfslide1up.
It makes more sense to robustify the vec_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112470
Bug ID: 112470
Summary: [AARCH64]stack-protector vulnerability fixing solution
impact code size and performance.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112463
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So digging through the history and I find this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/1999-December/024572.html
Which added the original place for the warning.
There has been improvements to it later
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112463
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:11 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 5:52 PM liuhongt wrote:
> >
> > When I'm working on PR112443, I notice there's some misoptimizations: after
> > we
> > fold _mm{,256}_blendv_epi8/pd/ps into gimple, the backend fails to combine
> > it
> > back to
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 5:52 PM liuhongt wrote:
>
> When I'm working on PR112443, I notice there's some misoptimizations: after we
> fold _mm{,256}_blendv_epi8/pd/ps into gimple, the backend fails to combine it
> back to v{,p}blendv{v,ps,pd} since the pattern is too complicated, so I think
> maybe
Hi,
on 2023/11/9 09:31, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch enables vector mode for by pieces equality compare. It
> adds a new expand pattern - cbrnachv16qi4 and set MOVE_MAX_PIECES
> and COMPARE_MAX_PIECES to 16 bytes when P8 vector enabled. The compare
> relies both move and compare
Hi Maxim and Alexander,
Thanks a lot for the review comments!
on 2023/11/10 01:40, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
>> Hi Kewen,
>>
>> Below are my comments. I don't want to override Alexander's review, and if
>> the patch looks good to him, it's fine
When I'm working on PR112443, I notice there's some misoptimizations: after we
fold _mm{,256}_blendv_epi8/pd/ps into gimple, the backend fails to combine it
back to v{,p}blendv{v,ps,pd} since the pattern is too complicated, so I think
maybe we should hanlde it in the gimple level.
The dump is
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_available_features):
Add avx10_set and version and detect avx10.1.
(cpu_indicator_init): Handle avx10.1-512.
* common/config/i386/i386-common.cc
(OPTION_MASK_ISA2_AVX10_1_256_SET): New.
Hi all,
This RFC patch aims to add AVX10.1 options. After we added -m[no-]evex512
support, it makes a lot easier to add them comparing to the August version.
Detail for AVX10 is shown below:
Intel Advanced Vector Extensions 10 (Intel AVX10) Architecture Specification
It describes the Intel
On 11/6/23 05:23, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Later patches add more calls to get_attribute_namespace.
For scoped attributes, this is a simple operation on tree pointers.
But for normal GNU attributes (the vast majority), it involves a
call to get_identifier ("gnu"). This patch caches the
On 11/3/23 00:18, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
On non-vector targets dejagnu attempts dg-do compile for pr95401.cc.
This produces a command like this:
g++ pr95401.cc pr95401a.cc -S -o pr95401.s
which isn't valid (gcc does not accept multiple input files when using
-S with -o).
This patch adds
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
> > Can we have the insn costing reverted to correct calculation?
> What needs to happen is that code needs to be extended, not reverted. Many
> codes have to be synthesized based on the condition and the true/false arms.
> That's not currently accounted for.
Thanks Jeff. Committed.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-11-10 09:26
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 11/7/23 08:18, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c: Add
On 11/7/23 08:18, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c: Add additional compile option for riscv.
I don't guess we know if other targets would benefit from this option.
The only reference in gcc-testresults to pr97428.c is an armv7 run from
2022. So
On 11/2/23 17:45, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
Testcases in g++.dg/vect rely on check_vect_support_and_set_flags
to set dg-do-what-default and avoid running vector tests on non-vector
targets. The three testcases in this patch overwrite the default with
dg-do run.
Removing the dg-do run directive
I am using --with-arch=rv32gcv --with-abi=ilp32d
I change dg-additional-option into dg-option of all those tests.
Issues gone.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-11-10 09:15
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Robin Dapp; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng
Subject: Re: [PATCH]
On 11/5/23 11:50, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch adds a way for targets to ask that selected mode changes
be brought forward, through a combination of:
(1) requiring a mode in blocks where the entity was previously
transparent
(2) pushing the transition at the head of a block onto
On 11/9/23 18:12, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
How to fix it ? I am pretty noob on testing CI.
Can Robin fix that?
It's most likely a problem on your side with how you've configured the
toolchain. I don't think this is somethign Robin can fix for you.
jeff
How to fix it ? I am pretty noob on testing CI.
Can Robin fix that?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-11-10 09:11
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Robin Dapp; gcc-patches; palmer; kito.cheng
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Fix zvfh tests.
On 11/9/23 18:09,
On 11/9/23 18:09, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
I am already using master branch.
The FAIL is:
xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for
'-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zfhmin_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvfh_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
That's an multilib
I am already using master branch.
The FAIL is:
xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for
'-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zfhmin_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvfh_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
I will update binutils again today to see whether it can fix the issue.
On 11/8/23 04:09, Mary Bennett wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/constraints.md: CVP2 -> CV_alu_pow2.
* config/riscv/corev.md: Likewise.
Bikeshedding alert... Usually we keep constraint names pretty small. It
helps when you've got patterns that may have many constraints.
Yes. No regression. Committed.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-11-10 07:56
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Move cond_copysign from combine pattern to autovec
pattern
On 11/9/23 16:33, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112432
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Committed, thanks Richard.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 11:12 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@sifive.com; Wang,
Yanzhang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Internal-fn: Add FLOATN support for l/ll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112432
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:907603d4b117e82dbbde2d58a04e33f3021908e7
commit r14-5307-g907603d4b117e82dbbde2d58a04e33f3021908e7
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Nov 9
When zero extracting a single bit bitfield from bits 16..31 on the H8 we
currently generate some pretty bad code.
The fundamental issue is we can't shift efficiently and there's no
trivial way to extract a single bit out of the high half word of an
SImode value.
What usually happens is we
On 11/7/23 10:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linxu-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
In the COMPOUND_EXPR case of tsubst_expr, we were redundantly clearing
the tf_decltype flag when substituting the LHS and also neglecting to
propagate it when
On 11/7/23 14:52, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk?
OK.
-- >8 --
We usually don't see capture proxies in finish_decltype_type because
process_outer_var_ref is a no-op inside an unevaluated context and
so a use of a capture
Hi.
See answers below.
On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 18:04 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 17:27 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This patch adds support for getting the CPU features in libgccjit
> > (bug
> > 112466)
> >
> > There's a TODO in the test:
> > I'm not sure how to
On 11/7/23 14:52, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
The capture decltype handling in finish_decltype_type wasn't looking
through implicit INDIRECT_REF (added by convert_from_reference), which
caused us to incorrectly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112443
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
Should be Fixed in GCC14/GCC13/GCC12
On 11/8/23 16:59, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk?
-- >8 --
Here when building up the non-dependent .* expression, we crash from
fold_convert on 'b.a' due to this (templated) COMPONENT_REF having an
IDENTIFIER_NODE instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112443
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1808ebfd8164cc90629b7308af3ef2b6fa965453
commit r12-9967-g1808ebfd8164cc90629b7308af3ef2b6fa965453
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112443
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5437160f4e205f991c829661f221448a97bef2d3
commit r13-8035-g5437160f4e205f991c829661f221448a97bef2d3
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112443
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a0cc04b9c9b02426762892b88efc5c44ba546bd
commit r14-5305-g9a0cc04b9c9b02426762892b88efc5c44ba546bd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Nov
This patch fixes the pseudo-c BPF assembly syntax used for
*mulsidi3_zeroextend, which was being emitted as:
rN *= wM
instead of the proper way to denote a mul32 in pseudo-C syntax:
wN *= wM
Includes test.
Tested in bpf-unknown-none-gcc target in x86_64-linux-gnu host.
gcc/ChangeLog:
On 11/9/23 14:58, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
Here we are wrongly parsing
int y(auto(42));
which uses the C++23 cast-to-prvalue feature, and initializes y to 42.
However, we were treating the auto as an implicit template
On 11/9/23 15:43, 钟居哲 wrote:
Hi. Robin.
[ ... ]
You may need a development version of binutils to get the zfh/zvfh
support and unreleased patches to get zfb/zvfb support.
Probably the easiest thing to do would be to look in the gcc.log file at
those failures and see what the excess
On 11/9/23 16:33, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
Since cond_copysign has been support into match.pd (middle-end).
We don't need to support conditional copysign by RTL combine pass.
Instead, we can support it by direct explicit cond_copysign optab.
conditional copysign tests are already available in the
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c: Fix regexp with expected result.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
index
On 11/9/23 18:29, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 05:57:39PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/9/23 04:55, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
I'm not sure if this is just papering over a general issue of clones not being
exported/imported, or if this is just an exception to the general
On 11/5/23 10:06, waffl3x wrote:
I had wanted to write about some of my frustrations with trying to
write a test for virtual specifiers and errors/warnings for
shadowing/overloading virtual functions, but I am a bit too tired at
the moment and I don't want to delay getting this up for another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #33 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 56549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56549=edit
ira and reload dumps for compiler_call_helper
The incorrect code for insn 246 in compiler_call_helper appears
Since cond_copysign has been support into match.pd (middle-end).
We don't need to support conditional copysign by RTL combine pass.
Instead, we can support it by direct explicit cond_copysign optab.
conditional copysign tests are already available in the testsuite.
No need to add tests.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 05:57:39PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/9/23 04:55, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this is just papering over a general issue of clones not
> > being
> > exported/imported, or if this is just an exception to the general case of
> > clones being able to
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> OK
Thanks, pushed (tests did pass).
Have a lovely night.
--
Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 19:32, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>
> This allows us to add features to freestanding which allow specifying
> non-default allocators (generators, collections, ...) without having to
> modify them.
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/memoryfwd.h: Remove HOSTED
On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 17:27 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> This patch adds support for getting the CPU features in libgccjit
> (bug
> 112466)
>
> There's a TODO in the test:
> I'm not sure how to test that gcc_jit_target_info_arch returns the
> correct value since it is dependant on the
Hi,
I added the BPF related issue and the solution in the section Appendix 4 Known
issues.
No change to other parts.
Send this V3 for record purpose.
Qing
Represent the missing dependence for the "counted_by" attribute and its
On 11/9/23 16:06, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
-- >8 --
A TEMPLATE_DECL does not have module attachment flags associated with
it, so this patch extracts the result from the template to read the
flags from there instead.
oh yeah. my original plan
On 11/9/23 04:55, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
I'm not sure if this is just papering over a general issue of clones not being
exported/imported, or if this is just an exception to the general case of
clones being able to be freely regenerated with no other issues.
Alternatively, would it be better to
Sent from my iPhone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
vector(8) int vect_prephitmp_11.23;
is gimplified from
.COND_NEG (_55, vect__29.18_40, { -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1 })
into
vect_prephitmp_11.23_50 to { 4294967295, 4294967294, 4294967293,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if there is a type issue here ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
--- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't see anything wrong with that patch but just exposing a latent bug in
> SCCVN/FRE:
>
> ```
> Value numbering stmt = vect_iftmp.22_46 = VEC_COND_EXPR 1, 1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
Snapshot gcc-11-20231109 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20231109/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112469
Bug ID: 112469
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: eliminate_stmt, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.cc:6944
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
