https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
2023-12-16 03:27 Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
>On 12/12/23 20:24, Xiao Zeng wrote:
>> This patch would like to add new sub extension (aka Zvfbfmin) to the
>> -march= option. It introduces a new data type BF16.
>>
>> Depending on different usage scenarios, the Zvfbfmin extension may
>> depend on 'V'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Blah, adding popcountti2 does not work as the middle-end (in
fold_builtin_bit_query) splits it into 2 __builtin_popcountll already ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103781
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113043
Bug ID: 113043
Summary: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4246
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96461
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39f9c426f58448d6df340cdccd84e05721a20921
commit r14-6619-g39f9c426f58448d6df340cdccd84e05721a20921
Author: Nathaniel Shead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113034
--- Comment #1 from Jiajie Chen ---
As pointed out by @lrzlin, the expected output should be:
```
1 -1 0
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113042
Bug ID: 113042
Summary: popcount of 8bits and 128bits can be improved for
!TARGET_CSSC
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 6:18 AM Andrew Carlotti wrote:
>
> This adds initial support for function multiversioning on aarch64 using
> the target_version and target_clones attributes. This loosely follows
> the Beta specification in the ACLE [1], although with some differences
> that still need to
On 12/15/23 19:20, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with GLIBCXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=20
and RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0".
OK, thanks.
-- >8 --
My previous patch (naively) assumed that a TREE_CODE of RECORD_TYPE or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113041
Bug ID: 113041
Summary: misleading diagnostic for variable of non-literal type
in constexpr function in C++20 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98792, which changed state.
Bug 98792 Summary: Fail to use SHRN instructions for narrowing shift on aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> This may be caused by r14-2692-g1c6231c05bdcca
This commit changes the behavior of -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch.
Workaround is to use -fcf-protection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113040
Bug ID: 113040
Summary: [14 Regression] libmvec test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
Bug ID: 113039
Summary: [14 Regression] -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch
doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
This adds initial support for function multiversioning on aarch64 using
the target_version and target_clones attributes. This loosely follows
the Beta specification in the ACLE [1], although with some differences
that still need to be resolved (possibly as follow-up patches).
Existing function
This patch adds support for the "target_version" attribute to the middle
end and the C++ frontend, which will be used to implement function
multiversioning in the aarch64 backend.
On targets that don't use the "target" attribute for multiversioning,
there is no conflict between the "target" and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b8f9636c1b19fff7723995f2d58d41f3d30c46d
commit r12-10056-g2b8f9636c1b19fff7723995f2d58d41f3d30c46d
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bf040fcd23aaa7d8c4873d1170776ab117bc213
commit r12-10055-g4bf040fcd23aaa7d8c4873d1170776ab117bc213
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0246a37ebdef4ffc863fe4c56e812c0614026e02
commit r12-10052-g0246a37ebdef4ffc863fe4c56e812c0614026e02
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112845
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87d013f7c877f944adbbaa4e94244baf990cb9f2
commit r12-10054-g87d013f7c877f944adbbaa4e94244baf990cb9f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112837
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d02372f39dc6506a4ff88a7f01fb5570a82606c0
commit r12-10053-gd02372f39dc6506a4ff88a7f01fb5570a82606c0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:029b826f62d2d193e93539749a534b9a13ade728
commit r12-10048-g029b826f62d2d193e93539749a534b9a13ade728
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1761303c77219281c22ab50b4a9ce65920c4023
commit r12-10051-gf1761303c77219281c22ab50b4a9ce65920c4023
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111408
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cb9cecdb582b44b04e9c49532ddf0065b5c3612
commit r12-10050-g9cb9cecdb582b44b04e9c49532ddf0065b5c3612
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:327713d54122ab5635f3c385aecf113e5afe190c
commit r12-10049-g327713d54122ab5635f3c385aecf113e5afe190c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a93c334865af18ce2fd50cd77a9e90939f3c231
commit r12-10046-g9a93c334865af18ce2fd50cd77a9e90939f3c231
Author: Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any comments on this approach?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This makes constexpr std::vector (mostly) work in Debug Mode. All safe
> iterator instrumentation and checking is disabled during constant
> evaluation, because it requires mutex locks and calls to
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with GLIBCXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=20
and RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0".
-- >8 --
My previous patch (naively) assumed that a TREE_CODE of RECORD_TYPE or
UNION_TYPE was sufficient for optype to be considered a "class
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 1:38 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/12/23 20:54, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > I can't actually find anything in the ISA manual that makes Ztso imply
> > A. In theory the memory ordering is just a different thing that the set
> > of availiable instructions (ie, Ztso without
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:43:22 -0500
"David H. Lynch Jr. via Gcc" wrote:
> Right now I am just focused on some means to deliver support.
Hi David,
My colleague Bob Dubner and I have been extending GCC every day for
the last two years. I wonder if we might be of some use to you.
I only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 86970, which changed state.
Bug 86970 Summary: Rejected constexpr expression involving lambdas and
inheritance, "use of this in a constant expression"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
On 12/12/23 12:32, Mary Bennett wrote:
Spec:
github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-sw/blob/master/specifications/corev-builtin-spec.md
Contributors:
Mary Bennett
Nandni Jamnadas
Pietra Ferreira
Charlie Keaney
Jessica Mills
Craig Blackmore
Simon Cook
Jeremy Bennett
On 12/12/23 12:32, Mary Bennett wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/constraints.md: CVP2 -> CV_alu_pow2.
* config/riscv/corev.md: Likewise.
---
Kito ack'd the V3 patch, so I went ahead and pushed this to the trunk.
jeff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
Bug ID: 113038
Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for
g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after
r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Snapshot gcc-12-20231215 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20231215/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112896
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #1
On 12/12/23 12:32, Mary Bennett wrote:
Spec:
github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-sw/blob/master/specifications/corev-builtin-spec.md
Contributors:
Mary Bennett
Nandni Jamnadas
Pietra Ferreira
Charlie Keaney
Jessica Mills
Craig Blackmore
Simon Cook
Jeremy Bennett
On 12/14/23 14:32, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
The testcase for pr112773 started passing after r14-6472-g8501edba91e
which was before the actual fix. This patch adds -fno-vect-cost-model
which prevents the testcase from passing due to the vls change.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105733
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #33 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #32)
> commit a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a (HEAD -> master,
> origin/master, origin/HEAD)
> Author: Jerry DeLisle
> Date: Fri Dec 15
On 12/12/23 20:54, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
I can't actually find anything in the ISA manual that makes Ztso imply
A. In theory the memory ordering is just a different thing that the set
of availiable instructions (ie, Ztso without A would still imply TSO for
loads and stores). It also seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
On 12/14/23 17:14, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:36 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/14/23 02:46, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:34 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
A handful of the scalar crypto instructions are supposed to take a
constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:082835836cf763e74ed2fdf9645ac4f1f94d6d4f
commit r14-6607-g082835836cf763e74ed2fdf9645ac4f1f94d6d4f
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Dec 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
commit a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Fri Dec 15 13:05:18 2023 -0800
fortran: Update degree trigs documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a
commit r14-6606-ga1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112944
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112918
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've been working on the PR this week. The problem for this case is in that
for subreg reload LRA can not narrow reg class more from ALL_REGS to
GENERAL_REGS and then to data regs or address regs.
The
On 15/12/2023 15:34, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Alex Coplan writes:
> > This is a v6 of the aarch64 load/store pair fusion pass, which
> > addresses the feedback from Richard's last review here:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/640539.html
> >
> > In particular this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 109796, which changed state.
Bug 109796 Summary: 548.exchange2_r compiled with -O2 -flto regressed by 5% on
aarch64 between r14-135-gd06e9264b0192c and r14-192-g636e2273aec555
I am part of a project developing content addressable memory. I am the
2nd author for a paper on this presented at MEMSYS 2023, and with
additions likely to be accepted by ACM shortly.
https://www.memsys.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/10.pdf
My role is to develop software to demonstrate the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113021
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like it is the uninitialized field pointer which is causing the issues.
Looks like GCC does not currently fully support that for const variables inside
a constexpr/consteval . The linked PRs are about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 12/12/23 20:24, Xiao Zeng wrote:
This patch would like to add new sub extension (aka Zvfbfmin) to the
-march= option. It introduces a new data type BF16.
Depending on different usage scenarios, the Zvfbfmin extension may
depend on 'V' or 'Zve32f'. This patch only implements dependencies
On 15/12/2023 11:31, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
On 2023/12/14 23:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 09/12/2023 15:39, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
This patch try to introduce the rwlock and split the read/write to
unit_root tree and unit_cache with rwlock instead of the mutex to
increase CPU efficiency.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
> During partial ordering, we want to look through dependent alias
> template specializations within template arguments and otherwise
> treat them as opaque in other contexts (see e.g. r7-7116-g0c942f3edab108
> and r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa240). To that end
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > For a complex alias template-id, dependent_alias_template_spec_p returns
> > true if any template argument of the template-id is dependent. This
> > predicate indicates that substitution into the
Enables assert that every typed instruction is associated with a
dfa reservation
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_sched_variable_issue): enable assert
Signed-off-by: Edwin Lu
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
This patch copies the vector reservations from generic-ooo.md and
inserts them into generic.md and sifive.md. The vector pipelines are
necessary to avoid an ICE from the assert
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/generic-ooo.md: syntax
* config/riscv/generic.md (pipe0): new reservation
This patch does not create vector related insn reservations for
generic.md and sifive-7.md. It updates/creates insn reservations
for all non-vector typed insns
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/generic-ooo.md (generic_ooo_sfb_alu): create/update
reservation
(generic_ooo_branch):
This series is a prototype for adding all typed instructions to a dfa
scheduling pipeline.
I've been working on adding insn reservations for all typed instructions
to ensure all instructions are part of a dfa pipeline. I don't have a good
understanding of vector instruction latency, so I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113037
Bug ID: 113037
Summary: GNAT BUG DETECTED when instantiating generic package
with Type_Invariant on a type derived from a generic
type
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
Bug ID: 113036
Summary: GNAT BUG DETECTED ICE box triggered by a default value
that is a nested iterated aggregate
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> Hi!
>
> While looking at a bitint ICE, I've noticed we don't optimize
> in f1 and f5 functions below the 2 casts into just one at GIMPLE,
> even when optimize it in convert_to_integer if it appears in the same
> stmt. The large match.pd simplification of two conversions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113035
Bug ID: 113035
Summary: RISC-V: -mtune=sifive-7-series additional dump
failures found with bitmanip, zicond, and vector
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113034
Bug ID: 113034
Summary: Miscompilation of __m128 ne comparison on LoongArch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
On Linux/x86_64,
8afdbcdd7abe1e3c7a81e07f34c256e7f2dbc652 is the first bad commit
commit 8afdbcdd7abe1e3c7a81e07f34c256e7f2dbc652
Author: Di Zhao
Date: Fri Dec 15 03:22:32 2023 +0800
Consider fully pipelined FMA in get_reassociation_width
caused
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr110279-2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83417
waffl3x changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||waffl3x at protonmail dot com
--- Comment #5
Hi Hanke!
On 2023-12-13T17:04:57+0800, Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to create a global variable in my own PASS which
> located at the LATE_IPA_PASSES. (I'm using GCC 10.3.0.)
I can't comment on IPA aspects, or whether something was different on
oldish GCC 10 (why using that one,
Hi Richard,
Here are more details about the testcase failure and my analysis/fix:
Testcase:
void f(int *i)
{
if (!i)
return;
else
{
__builtin_printf("Hi");
*i=0;
}
}
--
Assembly w/o patch:
cbz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113033
Bug ID: 113033
Summary: GCC 14 (20231203 snapshot) ICE when building LSX
vector rotate code on LoongArch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113032
Bug ID: 113032
Summary: RISCV linker relaxation leaves redundant addi (from
load immediate)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #5 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
many thanks for the bug report - all fixed in gcc master branch.
Alex Coplan writes:
> This is a v6 of the aarch64 load/store pair fusion pass, which
> addresses the feedback from Richard's last review here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/640539.html
>
> In particular this version implements the suggested changes which
> greatly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d7a480eedf0a195318d0fce2c9c57acae43ec9d
commit r14-6596-g7d7a480eedf0a195318d0fce2c9c57acae43ec9d
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
This is a v6 of the aarch64 load/store pair fusion pass, which
addresses the feedback from Richard's last review here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/640539.html
In particular this version implements the suggested changes which
greatly simplify the double list walk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56886=edit
Proposed fix
Here is the proposed fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
commit r14-6595-gea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
commit r14-6595-gea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109715
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46984fa259436ad50afb50a46a0a16e83bdf7172
commit r14-6594-g46984fa259436ad50afb50a46a0a16e83bdf7172
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:43 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 01:17, Tim Song wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 6:05 PM Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >> + inline void
> >> + vprint_unicode(ostream& __os, string_view __fmt, format_args __args)
> >> + {
> >> +
David Malcolm writes:
> Move a further 268 tests from gcc.dg/analyzer to c-c++-common/analyzer.
>
> Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> Pushed to trunk as r14-6564-gae034b9106fbdd.
This patch introduced 840 additional FAILs on i386-pc-solaris2.11, no
doubt more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
--- Comment #3 from Zack Weinberg ---
It's come to my attention that people fairly often write `sizeof('x')` (or some
other character constant), _expecting_ it to evaluate as `sizeof(char)`. But
this is only true in C++. In C, `sizeof('x')`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a982b9cb690a163434f1ac5a0901548b594205f2
commit r13-8160-ga982b9cb690a163434f1ac5a0901548b594205f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c0ea9320ce4d2381ebf043cd20a0afce88da880
commit r13-8159-g8c0ea9320ce4d2381ebf043cd20a0afce88da880
Author: Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
