[Bug middle-end/94988] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #9) > ISTM that the test invokes undefined behavior because the assignment and the > increment in the loop both modify the same storage without an intervening >

[PATCH] bpf: Add documentation for the -mcpu option

Add documentation describing the meaning and values for the -mcpu command-line option. Tested for bpf-unknown-none on x86_64-linux-gnu host. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/bpf/bpf.opt: Add help information for -mcpu. Signed-off-by: Will Hawkins --- gcc/config/bpf/bpf.opt | 2 ++ 1 file

[PATCH 2/2 V2] rs6000: Load store fusion for rs6000 target using common infrastructure

Hello All: This patch is for load store fusion for rs6000 target using common infrastructure. Common infrastructure using generic code for load store fusion of rs6000 target. Generic code are implemented and defined that can be used in target specific code for aarch64 and rs6000 target.

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add new option -march=help to print all supported extensions

Thanks for the test and review, pushed :) On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:43 PM Christoph Müllner wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:56 AM Kito Cheng wrote: > > > > The output of -march=help is like below: > > > > ``` > > All available -march extensions for RISC-V: > > Name

[Bug target/109349] riscv: Add --print-supported-extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109349 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7af0f1e107a480fbfe882cb985603960114aefb5 commit r14-9023-g7af0f1e107a480fbfe882cb985603960114aefb5 Author: Kito Cheng Date: Fri

[Bug target/63672] xbegin/xend/xabort missing memory barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63672 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16

[Bug middle-end/36109] GET_MODE_SIZE is inefficient for constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/53103] bug locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53103 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106615] redundant load and store introduced in if-true-branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106615 --- Comment #2 from absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Reduced testcase: > int g_44; > > void func_16(int *a, unsigned long int b) { > *a = 5; > if ((g_44 = 1) <= b) > ; >

[Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail, xfail Last

[Bug middle-end/48504] Add Variable Length Array (VLA) support for -fstack-protector(-all)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48504 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Bug target/45335] Use ldrd to load two consecutive words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45335 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0, 7.3.0 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/33780] different results between O3 and O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33780 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- I can only reproduce this these days on 32bit x86 when x87 is in use ...

[Bug testsuite/12010] g++.exp and libstdc++.exp fail to find testsuite_flags when cross-compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12010 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0 Status|NEW

[Bug target/113955] New: Finish LRA transition for mips by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113955 Bug ID: 113955 Summary: Finish LRA transition for mips by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/113954] New: Finish LRA transition for arc by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113954 Bug ID: 113954 Summary: Finish LRA transition for arc by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/113953] New: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953 Bug ID: 113953 Summary: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/113952] New: Finish LRA transition for sparc by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113952 Bug ID: 113952 Summary: Finish LRA transition for sparc by removing -mlra Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/50774] Internal Compiler Error when march=bdver1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50774 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/113780] [ARM] Incorrect indirect tailcall generated for PAC-enabled function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780 Tejas Belagod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/113780] [ARM] Incorrect indirect tailcall generated for PAC-enabled function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tejas Belagod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f436a2ab6ad15968275c9bbf3bd56647e5559e68 commit r14-9022-gf436a2ab6ad15968275c9bbf3bd56647e5559e68 Author: Tejas Belagod Date:

[Bug target/113951] New: regression redundant load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113951 Bug ID: 113951 Summary: regression redundant load Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

Re: [PATCH v5 13/14] c++: Implement __rank built-in trait

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:14 PM Ken Matsui wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:48 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > > > This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank. > > > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * cp-trait.def: Define __rank. >

Re: [PATCH v5 13/14] c++: Implement __rank built-in trait

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:48 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote: > > > This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank. > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > > > * cp-trait.def: Define __rank. > > * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK. > >

[PATCH v6 13/14] c++: Implement __rank built-in trait

This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cp-trait.def: Define __rank. * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK. (finish_trait_expr): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of

Re: [PATCH] Turn on LRA on all targets

> On Feb 15, 2024, at 5:56 PM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:34:32PM +, Sam James wrote: >> I have now started doing this in PR113932. > > Thank you! > > Segher Presumably this isn't for version 14 since it's in a late stage, right? I have my bits about

[Bug c++/110894] [modules] Program terminates with signal SIGSEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110894 Bug 110894 depends on bug 109953, which changed state. Bug 109953 Summary: [c++modules] segmentation fault with import "functional" during program execution https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109953 What|Removed

[Bug c++/109953] [c++modules] segmentation fault with import "functional" during program execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109953 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/110894] [modules] Program terminates with signal SIGSEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110894 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 110894, which changed state. Bug 110894 Summary: [modules] Program terminates with signal SIGSEGV https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110894 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/113950] PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113950] New: PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 Bug ID: 113950 Summary: PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

Re: Question on -fwrapv and -fwrapv-pointer

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:32:17AM -0800, Fangrui Song wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:43 AM Kees Cook via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:47:08PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 15, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Richard Biener > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/112508] [14 Regression] Size regression when using -Os starting with r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112508 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

Re: [PATCH] Notes on the warnings-as-errors change in GCC 14

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Naive questions: Can definitions really be prototypes (in C)? > Yes, I think so: definitions can be declarations, and function > prototypes are declarations. The standard uses the phrase “function > definition that does not include a function

[PATCH] testsuite: Fix vfprintf-chk-1.c with -fhardened

With _FORTIFY_SOURCE >= 2 (enabled by -fhardened), vfprintf-chk-1.c's __vfprintf_chk ends up calling __vprintf_chk rather than vprintf. ``` --- a/fortify.s +++ b/no-fortify.s @@ -8,27 +8,28 @@ [...] __vfprintf_chk: [...] movl$1, should_optimize(%rip) - jmp __vfprintf_chk +

Re: [PATCH] Turn on LRA on all targets

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:34:32PM +, Sam James wrote: > I have now started doing this in PR113932. Thank you! Segher

gcc-11-20240215 is now available

Snapshot gcc-11-20240215 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240215/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

[Bug analyzer/113923] Segfault in gcc/gcc/tree-diagnostic.cc:265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113923 --- Comment #4 from Antoni --- I might be able to soon create a reproducer, but for now, I can say it might be related to __attribute__ ((always_inline)).

Re: [PATCH] Turn on LRA on all targets

> On May 15, 2023, at 5:09 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > ... > > I may choose to implement a non-DWARF unwinder instead, as the VAX stack > frame is always fully described by the hardware and there is never ever a > need for debug information to be able to decode any VAX stack frame

[PATCH] c++: wrong looser excep spec for dep noexcept [PR113158]

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? By the ??? below I mean that maybe_instantiate_noexcept could return a tristate, and then maybe_check_overriding_exception_spec could check if (maybe_instantiate_noexcept ().is_unknown ()) return true; and we don't have to add

[PATCH] c++: wrong looser exception spec with deleted fn

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? IMHO trivial enough to go ahead now seeing as it doesn't introduce new errors. -- >8 -- I noticed we don't implement the "unless the overriding function is defined as deleted" wording added to [except.spec] via CWG 1351. DR

[PATCH] libgccjit: Add option to allow special characters in function names

Hi. This patch adds a new option to allow special characters like . and $ in function names. This is useful to allow for mangling using those characters. Thanks for the review. From 89a92e561ca83a622dcc22a6500ca2b17551edb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antoni Boucher Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: relax diagnostic about GMF contents

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 2/15/24 16:10, Patrick Palka wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look > > OK for trunk? > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > Issuing a hard error when the GMF doesn't contain preprocessing > > directives is inconvenient for

Re: [PATCH v5 13/14] c++: Implement __rank built-in trait

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote: > This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank. > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * cp-trait.def: Define __rank. > * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK. > (finish_trait_expr): Likewise. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > >

[COMMITTED] libgomp: Update documentation for indirect calls in target regions

Hi, I have committed this patch to the libgomp documentation to reflect that indirect calls in offloaded target regions are now supported in C, C++ and Fortran. KwokFrom b3b3bd250f0a7c22b7d46d3522c8b94c6a35d22a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kwok Cheung Yeung Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:22:26

Re: [PATCH] c++: implicit move with throw [PR113853]

On 2/15/24 10:19, Marek Polacek wrote: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- Here we have template auto is_throwable(T t) -> decltype(throw t, true) { ... } where we didn't properly mark 't' as IMPLICIT_RVALUE_P, which caused the wrong overload to have

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: relax diagnostic about GMF contents

On 2/15/24 16:10, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- Issuing a hard error when the GMF doesn't contain preprocessing directives is inconvenient for automated testcase reduction via cvise. This patch relaxes this

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: stream TREE_UNAVAILABLE and LAMBDA_EXPR_REGEN_INFO

On 2/15/24 16:11, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? OK. -- >8 -- gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * module.cc (trees_out::core_bools): Stream TREE_UNAVAILABLE. (trees_in::core_bools): Likewise.

[Bug analyzer/111289] [13/14 Regression] Unwarranted -Wanalyzer-va-arg-type-mismatch warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unwarranted |[13/14 Regression]

[PATCH] c++/modules: stream TREE_UNAVAILABLE and LAMBDA_EXPR_REGEN_INFO

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * module.cc (trees_out::core_bools): Stream TREE_UNAVAILABLE. (trees_in::core_bools): Likewise. (trees_out::core_vals): Stream LAMBDA_EXPR_REGEN_INFO.

[PATCH] c++/modules: relax diagnostic about GMF contents

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? -- >8 -- Issuing a hard error when the GMF doesn't contain preprocessing directives is inconvenient for automated testcase reduction via cvise. This patch relaxes this diagnostic into a pedwarn. gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

[Bug analyzer/111266] [13 Regression] Missing -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds for concrete offset overwrite.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111266 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] Missing |[13 Regression] Missing

[Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > Am 15.02.2024 um 19:53 schrieb tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 > > --- Comment #21 from Tamar Christina --- > (In reply to Richard

[pushed] analyzer: remove offset_region size overloads [PR111266]

PR analyzer/111266 reports a missing -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds when accessing relative to a concrete byte offset. Root cause is that offset_region::get_{byte,bit}_size_sval were attempting to compute the size that's valid to access, rather than the size of the access attempt. Fixed by removing

[Bug analyzer/111266] [13/14 Regression] Missing -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds for concrete offset overwrite.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111266 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:617bd59c659dcf6e5391409a2e9f64f75e905a96 commit r14-9018-g617bd59c659dcf6e5391409a2e9f64f75e905a96 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug target/113933] Switch pa to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933 --- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2024-02-15 2:01 p.m., sjames at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > People are getting eager to require LRA. Please port the PA target to LRA (see > PR113932). Having tried this once, I know it's non

[PATCH] bpf: add inline memmove and memcpy expansion

BPF programs are not typically linked, which means we cannot fall back on library calls to implement __builtin_{memmove,memcpy} and should always expand them inline if possible. GCC already successfully expands these builtins inline in many cases, but failed to do so for a few for simple cases

[Bug target/113949] Switch vax to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113949 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |macro at orcam dot me.uk

[Bug target/113778] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx code_label) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1506 with -march=armv9-a+sme -fhardened

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113778 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 107191, which changed state. Bug 107191 Summary: [modules] ICE when importing module partition (internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9061) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191

[Bug c++/107191] [modules] ICE when importing module partition (internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9061)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107191 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113947] Switch pdp11 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113947 pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/99336] [modules] ICE combining unordered_map, memory, module partitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99336 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 99336, which changed state. Bug 99336 Summary: [modules] ICE combining unordered_map, memory, module partitions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99336 What|Removed |Added

[Bug analyzer/111229] -fanalyzer confused about conditional operator branch name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111229 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this. Probably a duplicate of PR 100116.

[Bug analyzer/110014] [13 Regression] -Wanalyzer-allocation-size mishandles realloc (..., .... * sizeof (object))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110014 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/109577] [13 Regression] -Wanalyzer-allocation-size mishandles __builtin_mul_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/112974] [14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index false positive seen on Linux kernel drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112974 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/112975] [14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size false positive seen in Linux kernel's drivers/xen/privcmd.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112975 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/110928] [14 Regression] ICE with -fanalyzer on -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds checker

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110928 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-15

[Bug analyzer/109131] [13/14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positive seen in git's builtin/show-ref.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109131 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/113930] [modules] checking ICE in register_duplicate when using partitioned modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113930 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103524 Summary|[modules]

[PATCH] libgccjit: Do not treat warnings as errors

Hi. This patch makes libgccjit treat warnings as warnings instead of errors in order to continue the compilation when there are warnings. One thing I'm not sure what to do about is that warnings will keep overriding first_error as long as there are no errors. What behavior should we have here?

[Bug target/113946] Switch ft32 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/113946] Switch ft32 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- ft32 has a maintainer (James Bowman) but I can't find a BZ account for him to CC.

[Bug target/113949] New: Switch vax to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113949 Bug ID: 113949 Summary: Switch vax to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113948] New: Switch rx to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113948 Bug ID: 113948 Summary: Switch rx to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113947] New: Switch pdp11 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113947 Bug ID: 113947 Summary: Switch pdp11 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113946] New: Switch ft32 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946 Bug ID: 113946 Summary: Switch ft32 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

Re: [PATCH] Turn on LRA on all targets

Sam James writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > "Maciej W. Rozycki" writes: > >> On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> >>> > There are extra ICEs in regression testing and code quality is poor; cf. >>> > .

[Bug target/113932] [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- ft32: Target Var(ft32_lra_flag) Init(0) Save pdp11, rx and vax has a TARGET_MASK which are not turned on by default either.

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Clear pending_assemble_externals_processed

On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 14:14 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > It's OK to merge even though it touches files outside of the jit > directory and we're in stage 4? > Or do we need some kind of approval? I think this patch is sufficiently low-risk that you can go ahead and merge it. Dave > > On Thu,

[Bug target/113945] New: Switch visium to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113945 Bug ID: 113945 Summary: Switch visium to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113944] New: Switch rl78 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113944 Bug ID: 113944 Summary: Switch rl78 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Clear pending_assemble_externals_processed

It's OK to merge even though it touches files outside of the jit directory and we're in stage 4? Or do we need some kind of approval? On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 10:35 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 17:09 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > > Hi. > > This patch fixes the bug 113842. > >

[Bug target/113943] New: Switch m32c to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113943 Bug ID: 113943 Summary: Switch m32c to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113942] New: Switch msp430 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113942 Bug ID: 113942 Summary: Switch msp430 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113941] New: Switch mn10300 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113941 Bug ID: 113941 Summary: Switch mn10300 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/113940] New: Switch mcore to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113940 Bug ID: 113940 Summary: Switch mcore to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113939] New: Switch m68k to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939 Bug ID: 113939 Summary: Switch m68k to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da93a3d0976ad42aa6b4f5742119f3189ea21400 commit r11-11241-gda93a3d0976ad42aa6b4f5742119f3189ea21400 Author: Jakub

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c81fed21c355565182e00bed58375e2f3dcf01c commit r12-10160-g7c81fed21c355565182e00bed58375e2f3dcf01c Author: Jakub

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2354ccb493ddca6d2e1af9cc76ad45367932f1e2 commit r13-8330-g2354ccb493ddca6d2e1af9cc76ad45367932f1e2 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[committed] testsuite: Require lra effective target for pr107385.c

Hi! Old reload doesn't support asm goto with output operands. We have lra effective target (though, strangely it returns 0 just for 2 targets out of at least 16 targets with no LRA support), so this patch uses it, similarly how it is done in other asm goto tests with output operands. Tested on

[Bug target/113938] New: Switch frv to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113938 Bug ID: 113938 Summary: Switch frv to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113937] New: Switch fr30 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113937 Bug ID: 113937 Summary: Switch fr30 to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along indirect edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107385 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d5d1c75f5c68b6064640c3154ae5f4c0b464905 commit r14-9017-g0d5d1c75f5c68b6064640c3154ae5f4c0b464905 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/113936] New: Switch c6x to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113936 Bug ID: 113936 Summary: Switch c6x to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/113935] New: Switch bfin to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113935 Bug ID: 113935 Summary: Switch bfin to LRA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

  1   2   3   4   >