https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #2 from
git commit g:9de9ff371c83505a8ce1ff1a7612c2523f175150
gcc-descr r13-8414-g9de9ff371c8350
power8
Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 06:10:20 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal error in ICF pass |[14 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
> Am 10.03.2024 um 04:14 schrieb pan2...@intel.com:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> This patch would like to fix one ICE in vectorizable_store when both the
> loop_masks and loop_lens are enabled. The ICE looks like below when build
> with "-march=rv64gcv -O3".
>
> during GIMPLE pass: vect
> test.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|12.1.0 |
Keywords|
git commit g:9291c8f9f81d05f52a6f6b4658c92ebc0209bb76
gcc-descr r11-11275-g9291c8f9f81d05
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 05:39:53 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
git commit g:7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
gcc-descr r14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e1e4
power8
Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 03:56:59 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] C |[11 Regression] C code is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56829
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note GCC 14 adds the ability to auto-vectorize early exist loops. I am not sure
if this helps this issue here though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89049
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh the TREE_OVERFLOW part was fixed much earlier than that though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-O3 -fno-tree-vectorize and -O3 -fno-tree-vrp works. I looked at the ever
dump and it is not doing anything suspicious. Looks like range_info usage in
vectoriser is causing the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|4.7.1
# From
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_v8a_hard_eabi-build/377/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-10T04:47:35+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e) arm-eabi
{-mthumb/-march=armv8-a+simd/-mfpu=auto/-mfloat-abi=hard}
Target is arm-unknown-eabi
Host is
Regressions on master at commit r14-9413 vs commit r14-9393 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
New passes:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes600663
# of unexpected failures400
# of unexpected successes 59
# of expected failures 4657
# of unsupported tests 10710
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
git commit g:7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
gcc-descr r14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e1e4
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
gcc-descr r14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e1e4
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 04:10:53 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
For aarch64, it has been since GCC 13 though for the testcase in comment #6 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Aren't we compiling for PA2.0? If so, shouldn't we have a full 14 bit offset
support, even when a load/store hits the FP register file (feel free to correct
me if I'm wrong, it's only been 20 years since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81189
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533
--- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #16)
> Note that Jakub recently twiddled fwprop to throttle it back a little. As a
> result the regressions seen in this BZ are no longer an issue. I'm going to
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9415 vs commit r14-9413 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 02:40:04 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9415-g50531b6d400)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target sde
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-loadu2-m128-1.c scan-assembler \\tvinsertf128\\t
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-loadu2-m128d-1.c
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 02:40:04 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9415-g50531b6d400)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72)
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027
With Jakub's twiddle to the forward propagation pass, the assembly code
for pr59533-1.c has returned to its previous state. Thus I've reverted
my patch which adjusted the expected output.
Jeffcommit 6f7d000fcacef31a6947f95021e445c846170f92
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9 21:33:47 2024 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 87886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f7d000fcacef31a6947f95021e445c846170f92
commit r14-9417-g6f7d000fcacef31a6947f95021e445c846170f92
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9 21:33:47 2024 -0700
Revert "[committed] Adjust expectations for pr59533-1.c"
This reverts commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113533
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Code|Code generation regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114268
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
LAST_UPDATED: 10.03.2024 (нд) 3:35:13 UTC (revision )
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
git commit g:6276fa39cb830fdf8fd3199532039f58823d7a89
gcc-descr r12-10201-g6276fa39cb830f
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:6276fa39cb830fdf8fd3199532039f58823d7a89
gcc-descr r12-10201-g6276fa39cb830f
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 02:59:55 UTC 2024
git commit g:9291c8f9f81d05f52a6f6b4658c92ebc0209bb76
gcc-descr r11-11275-g9291c8f9f81d05
power8
Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 02:33:36 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95351
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110279
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109990
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-10
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have been studying this a bit by looking at the 2023 std and functionality of
printf().
Specifically printf() provides the 'A' descriptor which can be used for float
(kind=4) and double (kind=8). It will
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1821/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-10T03:02:53+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14-9415-g50531b6d400) armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
Native configuration is armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== libatomic tests ===
Running
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
Known to work|
LAST_UPDATED: 10.03.2024 (нд) 3:12:57 UTC (revision )
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c -Wc++-compat scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-3.c -Wc++-compat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106363
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] |[13 Regression] [modules]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102264
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Not sure why nobody's taken care of this yet. Under certain
circumstances python may be needed if you're building a RISC-V compiler.
Here's what I've checked in. Happy to adjust if folks want to wordsmith
it further.
Jeffcommit 7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
Author: jlaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
commit r14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9 20:11:39 2024 -0700
[committed] [target/102250] Document python requirement for risc-v
PR target/102250
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
commit r14-9416-g7c8f0a79a7e1e42f846ddbca14b98b47ddcfd178
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9
From: Pan Li
This patch would like to fix one ICE in vectorizable_store when both the
loop_masks and loop_lens are enabled. The ICE looks like below when build
with "-march=rv64gcv -O3".
during GIMPLE pass: vect
test.c: In function ‘d’:
test.c:6:6: internal compiler error: in
LAST_UPDATED: 10.03.2024 (нд) 2:51:12 UTC (revision )
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c -O0 scan-tree-dump
optimized "__divdc3"
FAIL:
git commit g:9de9ff371c83505a8ce1ff1a7612c2523f175150
gcc-descr r13-8414-g9de9ff371c8350
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:3e05eb949d77201a0220e2e596656967c716063f
gcc-descr r14-9414-g3e05eb949d7720
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 01:30:48 UTC 2024
LAST_UPDATED: 10.03.2024 (нд) 2:30:25 UTC (revision )
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/pr51628-30.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/pr51628-30.c -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99987
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
The issue here is the code we emit for mode-switching can change when -g
is added to the command line. This is caused by processing debug notes
occurring after a call which is the last real statement in a basic block.
Without -g the CALL_INSN is literally the last insn in the block and the
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50531b6d400945793a1d549e6ee941d989319d42
commit r14-9415-g50531b6d400945793a1d549e6ee941d989319d42
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9 19:27:32 2024 -0700
[committed] [PR target/111362] Fix compare-debug issue with mode switching
The issue here is the code we emit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50531b6d400945793a1d549e6ee941d989319d42
commit r14-9415-g50531b6d400945793a1d549e6ee941d989319d42
Author: jlaw
Date: Sat Mar 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Ping?
git commit g:3e05eb949d77201a0220e2e596656967c716063f
gcc-descr r14-9414-g3e05eb949d7720
power8
Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 00:23:36 UTC 2024
# From
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/998/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-10T01:34:16+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14-9414-g3e05eb949d7) aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libatomic tests ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85957
--- Comment #29 from Andrew Pinski ---
fexcess-precision=standard was added to C++ front-end by
r13-3290-g98e341130f8798 (for GCC 13).
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1694/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-10T01:02:57+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14-9414-g3e05eb949d7) aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target
git commit g:3e05eb949d77201a0220e2e596656967c716063f
gcc-descr r14-9414-g3e05eb949d7720
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
rted tests 4410
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
version 14.0.1 20240309 (experimental) [master revision
gcc-14-9413-gf5a805d8290] (GCC)
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gfortran tests ===
Running t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
Bug 38716 depends on bug 63401, which changed state.
Bug 63401 Summary: "optimize" attribute overwrites other options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
git commit g:9de9ff371c83505a8ce1ff1a7612c2523f175150
gcc-descr r13-8414-g9de9ff371c8350
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 10 00:22:48 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114284
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
600681
# of unexpected failures400
# of unexpected successes 59
# of expected failures 4657
# of unsupported tests 10710
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240309 (experimental) [master r14-9413-gf5a805d8290] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The larger point is we don't just disable passes because they have a bug, or
even multiple bugs. We need to do the right thing from an engineering
standpoint, ie, actually debug the problem.
In fact,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56286
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FIXME
Last reconfirmed|2013-02-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Sure, that's fine (I would've CC'd you for your opinion if you weren't here
already). I know you were reluctant already with the m68k PR, but figured this
was different enough to suggest it given the other one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Sam, no. That would be a big mistake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
We could flip the default for -ffold-mem-offsets for HPPA to off for now..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114288
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 57658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57658=edit
Patch
This change works around the reload issue for alpha.i and the reduced
test case.
In principle, this could
Snapshot gcc-13-20240309 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20240309/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gcov-profile|middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114291
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
`Declarations used by main, sorted by DECL_UID` is printed by
dump_enumerated_decls
Which is caused by execute_cleanup_cfg_post_optimizing :
```
if ((flag_compare_debug_opt || flag_compare_debug)
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It looks like tile_rows is not being captured correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.4, 5.3.0, 5.5.0, 6.4.0,
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
