[Bug c++/114360] New: Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized inside std::map internals with -O3

2024-03-15 Thread gcc at jade dot fyi via Gcc-bugs
function ‘void foo(const std::string&)’: meow.cc:5:43: note: ‘d’ declared here 5 | void foo(const std::string & s) { Derived d{{}, s}; } | ^ ``` Also reproduces in trunk 20240315 from godbolt here: https://godbolt.org/z/d7z5ErM71

Results for 13.2.1 20240316 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8456-g5acf627239] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
git commit g:5acf62723967605ad9037d83c3dc0fb2c8ca9669 gcc-descr r13-8456-g5acf6272396760 power8 Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le GNU Make 4.2.1 DejaGnu: DejaGnu version 1.6.2 Expect version 5.45.4 Tcl version 8.6 64-bit LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 04:11:07 UTC 2024

[Bug libstdc++/114359] std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop

2024-03-15 Thread angelo.landi at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359 --- Comment #2 from Angelo Landi --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > Due to an integer overflow > > Hmm, I don't think this is an integer overflow but rather due to wrapping. > Yes there is a difference as overflow is undefined

Regressions on master at commit r14-9496 vs commit r14-9469 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9496 vs commit r14-9469 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9496-gb5e1f069611] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-testresults
3412 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes600910 # of unexpected failures397 # of unexpected successes 59 # of expected failures 4657 # of unsupported tests 10743 /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xg

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14

2024-03-15 Thread stefansf--- via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 18:07:39 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9498-ga6dab195f70) === acats tests === FAIL: cb1010a === acats Summary === # of expected passes2327 # of unexpected failures1 Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14

Results for 11.4.1 20240316 [releases/gcc-11 revision f51018ba255:c547c55b4f5:cbb3931660d5bc2a5367bd65e3dfd42dacb7c56b] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
git commit g:cbb3931660d5bc2a5367bd65e3dfd42dacb7c56b gcc-descr r11-11281-gcbb3931660d5bc power9 Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le GNU Make 4.3 DejaGnu: DejaGnu version 1.6.2 Expect version 5.45.4 Tcl version 8.6 64-bit LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 03:46:23 UTC 2024

[Bug lto/113204] lto1: error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 64

2024-03-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- (For my own benefit for future reference: I ran go build -work -v -x, then went into the work dir it made, then ran /usr/lib/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64/link -v ..., then started pulling out the bits it ran

[Bug lto/113204] lto1: error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 64

2024-03-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- With some finagling: ``` /tmp/go-PR113204 $ ./run.sh + gcc -o test -Wl,--export-dynamic-symbol=_cgo_panic -Wl,--export-dynamic-symbol=_cgo_topofstack -Wl,--export-dynamic-symbol=crosscall2

[Bug lto/113204] lto1: error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 64

2024-03-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- I managed to run the test manually in `/usr/lib/go/src/cmd/link` with `go test cgo_test.go -x -v` and made writeTempFile dump the name/contents. At least now I can reproduce with just one command outside of

[Bug libstdc++/114359] std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- > Due to an integer overflow Hmm, I don't think this is an integer overflow but rather due to wrapping. Yes there is a difference as overflow is undefined behavior while wrapping is defined.

[Bug libstdc++/114359] New: std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop

2024-03-15 Thread angelo.landi at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359 Bug ID: 114359 Summary: std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

Results for 11.4.1 20240316 [releases/gcc-11 revision f51018ba25:c547c55b4f:cbb3931660d5bc2a5367bd65e3dfd42dacb7c56b] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
git commit g:cbb3931660d5bc2a5367bd65e3dfd42dacb7c56b gcc-descr r11-11281-gcbb3931660d5bc power8 Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le GNU Make 4.2.1 DejaGnu: DejaGnu version 1.6.2 Expect version 5.45.4 Tcl version 8.6 64-bit LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 02:24:53 UTC 2024

Results for 12.3.1 20240316 [remotes/origin/releases/gcc-12 r12-10216-g3101b8e06f] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
git commit g:3101b8e06fe08a0e63a2cac4bc8546cda8c87091 gcc-descr r12-10216-g3101b8e06fe08a power9 Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le GNU Make 4.3 DejaGnu: DejaGnu version 1.6.2 Expect version 5.45.4 Tcl version 8.6 64-bit LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 02:28:54 UTC 2024

Results for 14.0.1 20240316 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-9499-g53fb2cf7596] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi

2024-03-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_eabi-build/621/: LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-16T03:08:27+00:00 (master revision gcc-14-9499-g53fb2cf7596) arm-eabi Target is arm-unknown-eabi Host is arm-unknown-eabi === libstdc++ tests === Running target qemu

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-testresults
unexpected failures125 # of unexpected successes 27 # of expected failures 1556 # of unsupported tests 4088 /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) ==

Results for 14.0.1 20240316 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9499-g53fb2cf7596] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
git commit g:53fb2cf75965e4dbcf145a12d8ae41f4667a8498 gcc-descr r14-9499-g53fb2cf75965e4 power9 Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le GNU Make 4.3 DejaGnu: DejaGnu version 1.6.2 Expect version 5.45.4 Tcl version 8.6 64-bit LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 00:59:47 UTC 2024

Results for 14.0.1 20240316 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9499-g53fb2cf759] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
git commit g:53fb2cf75965e4dbcf145a12d8ae41f4667a8498 gcc-descr r14-9499-g53fb2cf75965e4 power8 Linux 5.4.0-172-generic ppc64le GNU Make 4.2.1 DejaGnu: DejaGnu version 1.6.2 Expect version 5.45.4 Tcl version 8.6 64-bit LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 00:21:57 UTC 2024

[Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --- So what is interesting is the way LLVM implements this as an IPO pass as how I described in comment #8, 6 years after I wrote that. Well they used "empty" rather than const . Note using it as an IPO pass I

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-9473-g0adc8c5f146: FAIL: 4 regressions on arm

2024-03-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master-ia32 r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-testresults
# of unexpected successes 27 # of expected failures 1556 # of unsupported tests 4073 /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master-ia32 r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix

Results for 14.0.1 20240316 (experimental) [remotes/origin/master r14-9499-g53fb2cf7596] (GCC) testsuite on pru-unknown-elf

2024-03-15 Thread The GnuPru BuildBot via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 16 01:00:10 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9499-g53fb2cf7596) Target is pru-unknown-elf Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === gcc tests === Running target pru-sim FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug gcov-profile/113765] [14 Regression] ICE: autofdo: val-profiler-threads-1.c compilation, error: probability of edge from entry block not initialized

2024-03-15 Thread erozen at microsoft dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113765 --- Comment #4 from Eugene Rozenfeld --- auto-profile currently doesn't guarantee that it will set probabilities on all edges because of zero basic block counts. Normally those edges just have probabilities set by the preceding profile_estimate

Results for 14.0.1 20240316 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-9499-g53fb2cf7596] (GCC) testsuite on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1721/: LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-16T00:44:01+00:00 (master revision gcc-14-9499-g53fb2cf7596) aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu === libatomic tests === Running target

Results for 13.2.1 20240315 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8455-g73898ceb25] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240315 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8455-g73898ceb25] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution

[Bug target/110934] m68k: ICE with -fzero-call-used-regs=all compiling openssh 9.3p2

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

Results for 13.2.1 20240315 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8445-g4e9f475cdc] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
f expected failures 1550 # of unsupported tests 3982 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240315 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8445-g4e9f475cdc] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2

Results for 14.0.1 20240314 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-9472-g38958ac987d] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi

2024-03-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_eabi-build/619/: LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-15T23:27:14+00:00 (master revision gcc-14-9472-g38958ac987d) arm-eabi Target is arm-unknown-eabi Host is arm-unknown-eabi === libstdc++ tests === Running target qemu

Regressions on master at commit r14-9496 vs commit r14-9469 on Linux/x86_64

2024-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression
Regressions on master at commit r14-9496 vs commit r14-9469 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9496-gb5e1f069611] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-testresults
cted successes 59 # of expected failures 4657 # of unsupported tests 10743 /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9496-gb5e1f069611] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

2024-03-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- The following may be a helpful read. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/openxl-fortran-aix/17.1.2?topic=formatting-value-separators I am auditing our list_read.c code for the various types. The NULL read plays

Re: [PATCH v1] C++: Support constexpr strings for asm statements

2024-03-15 Thread Andi Kleen
> > I think keeping it untranslated is fine for now. Any translation > > if really needed would be a separate feature. > > I mean, unless you make extra effort, it is translated. > Even in your current version, try constexpr *foo () { return "nop"; } > and you'll see that it actually results in

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Libstdc++ has to use some sneaky hacks to avoid destroying globals, we would definitely use no_destroy if we had it.

[Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- The patch is able to handle all 3 testcases here even: For the libstdc++ one: t3.cc.123t.dce2:Deleting : __cxxabiv1::__cxa_atexit (__dt_comp , , &__dso_handle);

[Bug target/114358] New: [13 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 Bug ID: 114358 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu default

2024-03-15 Thread stefansf--- via Gcc-testresults
0/vector/vec-scalar-cmp-1.c scan-assembler ne:\\n[^:]*\\twfcdb\\t%v[0-9]*,%v[0-9]*\\n\\t[^:]+\\tlocghine\\t%r2,1 XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopctb\\t%v24,%v24 XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopcth\\t%v24,%v24 ===

[gcc r13-8455] gimple-iterator: Some gsi_safe_insert_*before fixes

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73898ceb25052518b7e5427df3f05fe7e2784f55 commit r13-8455-g73898ceb25052518b7e5427df3f05fe7e2784f55 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Mar 14 09:57:13 2024 +0100 gimple-iterator: Some gsi_safe_insert_*before fixes When trying to use the gsi_safe_insert*before

[gcc r13-8453] gimple-iterator, ubsan: Fix ICE during instrumentation of returns_twice calls [PR112709]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d231faed146352543794bf9e9afbee2e6c76889 commit r13-8453-g3d231faed146352543794bf9e9afbee2e6c76889 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed Mar 13 09:16:45 2024 +0100 gimple-iterator, ubsan: Fix ICE during instrumentation of returns_twice calls [PR112709] ubsan,

[gcc r13-8452] i386: Fix a pasto in ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp [PR114339]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec5cb2a0f2436618219ce0ada3086f6088e37332 commit r13-8452-gec5cb2a0f2436618219ce0ada3086f6088e37332 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri Mar 15 10:46:47 2024 +0100 i386: Fix a pasto in ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp [PR114339] In r13-3803-gfa271afb58 I've added an

[gcc r13-8451] icf: Reset SSA_NAME_{PTR, RANGE}_INFO in successfully merged functions [PR113907]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f255e4baac68fc3568820cdca9412f67ff07940 commit r13-8451-g9f255e4baac68fc3568820cdca9412f67ff07940 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Mar 14 17:48:30 2024 +0100 icf: Reset SSA_NAME_{PTR,RANGE}_INFO in successfully merged functions [PR113907] AFAIK we have no

[gcc r13-8454] asan: Fix ICE during instrumentation of returns_twice calls [PR112709]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:847391913443069358986b398c2f86dac906d742 commit r13-8454-g847391913443069358986b398c2f86dac906d742 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Wed Mar 13 09:19:05 2024 +0100 asan: Fix ICE during instrumentation of returns_twice calls [PR112709] The following patch on top of

[Bug sanitizer/112709] [13 Regression] address sanitize and returns_twice causes an ICE

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112709 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:847391913443069358986b398c2f86dac906d742 commit r13-8454-g847391913443069358986b398c2f86dac906d742 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #62 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f255e4baac68fc3568820cdca9412f67ff07940 commit r13-8451-g9f255e4baac68fc3568820cdca9412f67ff07940 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/112709] [13 Regression] address sanitize and returns_twice causes an ICE

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112709 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d231faed146352543794bf9e9afbee2e6c76889 commit r13-8453-g3d231faed146352543794bf9e9afbee2e6c76889 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/110079] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE with -freorder-blocks-and-partition and inline-asm goto

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110079 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b69cbe2c85f0b8f4a5a6b23e257d69275bea182 commit r13-8448-g6b69cbe2c85f0b8f4a5a6b23e257d69275bea182 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114310] [11/12/13 Regression] [aarch64] __sync_val_compare_and_swap fails on __int128_t with newval = 0

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114310 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c907cee6163a3ec2c0edaebeace73e2d32835ee commit r13-8450-g1c907cee6163a3ec2c0edaebeace73e2d32835ee Author: Jakub Jelinek

[gcc r13-8450] aarch64: Fix TImode __sync_*_compare_and_exchange expansion with LSE [PR114310]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c907cee6163a3ec2c0edaebeace73e2d32835ee commit r13-8450-g1c907cee6163a3ec2c0edaebeace73e2d32835ee Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Mar 14 14:09:20 2024 +0100 aarch64: Fix TImode __sync_*_compare_and_exchange expansion with LSE [PR114310] The following

[Bug target/114339] [13 regression] Tor miscompiled with -O2 -mavx -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114339 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec5cb2a0f2436618219ce0ada3086f6088e37332 commit r13-8452-gec5cb2a0f2436618219ce0ada3086f6088e37332 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[gcc r13-8449] contrib: Improve dg-extract-results.sh's Python detection [PR109668]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c4785e77e8b54109fbb4f81a3b624e98184c2aa commit r13-8449-g8c4785e77e8b54109fbb4f81a3b624e98184c2aa Author: Sam James Date: Fri Mar 8 15:24:20 2024 +0100 contrib: Improve dg-extract-results.sh's Python detection [PR109668] 'python' on some systems (e.g. SLES

[Bug other/109668] 'python' vs. 'python3'

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109668 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c4785e77e8b54109fbb4f81a3b624e98184c2aa commit r13-8449-g8c4785e77e8b54109fbb4f81a3b624e98184c2aa Author: Sam James

[gcc r13-8448] bb-reorder: Fix -freorder-blocks-and-partition ICEs on aarch64 with asm goto [PR110079]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b69cbe2c85f0b8f4a5a6b23e257d69275bea182 commit r13-8448-g6b69cbe2c85f0b8f4a5a6b23e257d69275bea182 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Mar 7 10:02:49 2024 +0100 bb-reorder: Fix -freorder-blocks-and-partition ICEs on aarch64 with asm goto [PR110079] The

[gcc r13-8447] lower-subreg: Fix ROTATE handling [PR114211]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df3994a1be3565ad450d552dc94b696748a7807a commit r13-8447-gdf3994a1be3565ad450d552dc94b696748a7807a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue Mar 5 10:32:38 2024 +0100 lower-subreg: Fix ROTATE handling [PR114211] On the following testcase, we have (insn 10 7 11 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/114211] [13 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-coalesce-vars since r13-1907

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114211 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df3994a1be3565ad450d552dc94b696748a7807a commit r13-8447-gdf3994a1be3565ad450d552dc94b696748a7807a Author: Jakub Jelinek

[gcc r13-8446] i386: Fix ICEs with SUBREGs from vector etc. constants to XFmode [PR114184]

2024-03-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:128860abd58605d616c184a9a68886a25862b2dd commit r13-8446-g128860abd58605d616c184a9a68886a25862b2dd Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mon Mar 4 10:04:19 2024 +0100 i386: Fix ICEs with SUBREGs from vector etc. constants to XFmode [PR114184] The Intel extended format

[Bug target/114184] [12/13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn ) with _Complex long double and vector VCE

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114184 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:128860abd58605d616c184a9a68886a25862b2dd commit r13-8446-g128860abd58605d616c184a9a68886a25862b2dd Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

2024-03-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 57714 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57714=edit gcc14-pr114175.patch Untested x86_64 fix. Given the r13-3549 change, I'd guess most likely aarch64, alpha, arc,

[Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

Results for 13.2.1 20240315 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8445-g4e9f475cdc] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240315 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8445-g4e9f475cdc] (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution

gcc-12-20240315 is now available

2024-03-15 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-12-20240315 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20240315/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread jfb at chromium dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 --- Comment #5 from JF Bastien --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to JF Bastien from comment #3) > > The LLVM feature was added for XNU, because the kernel never runs its own > > global C++ destructors (but the compiler

[Bug middle-end/60466] Support for HARD_REGNO_NREGS_HAS_PADDING and HARD_REGNO_NREGS_WITH_PADDING broken

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60466 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.2, 4.4.7

[Bug target/57597] ICE: in get_section, at varasm.c:312: Segmentation fault with -fmerge-all-constants

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57597 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/50739] [avr] nameless error with -fmerge-all-constants

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50739 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug target/57491] [ia64] internal compiler error: in ia64_split_tmode -O2, quadmath

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57491 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to JF Bastien from comment #3) > The LLVM feature was added for XNU, because the kernel never runs its own > global C++ destructors (but the compiler can't know this). It saved a > non-trivial

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread jfb at chromium dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 --- Comment #3 from JF Bastien --- The LLVM feature was added for XNU, because the kernel never runs its own global C++ destructors (but the compiler can't know this). It saved a non-trivial amount of code generation.

[Bug target/64009] ICE when compiling pr48335-2.c with armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Status|NEW

[Bug target/64011] Fail to compile pr48335-2.c on big-endian where bit insert instruction supported

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64011 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|C++:

[Bug c++/114357] C++: Support the no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This sounds like a very dangerous attribute to have. It changes behavior and even could cause memory leaks if abused. Plus I think it is also designed to get around folks not programming well defined C++

[Bug target/37987] iwmmxt: insn does not satisfy its constraints on (int64_t)

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37987 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- iwmmxt support has been deprecated in GCC 13 .

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9498-ga6dab195f7] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER8) via Gcc-testresults
(test for excess errors) === gcc Summary === # of expected passes178057 # of unexpected failures148 # of unexpected successes 12 # of expected failures 1597 # of unsupported tests 4980 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc

[Bug c++/114357] New: C++: Support the no_destroy attribute

2024-03-15 Thread i at maskray dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 Bug ID: 114357 Summary: C++: Support the no_destroy attribute Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

2024-03-15 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target|riscv, loongarch|riscv, loongarch, x86_64 --- Comment #23

[Bug tree-optimization/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2024-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |tree-optimization

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [master revision gcc-14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

2024-03-15 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-testresults
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1847/: LAST_UPDATED: 2024-03-15T21:10:05+00:00 (master revision gcc-14-9498-ga6dab195f70) armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf Native configuration is armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf === libatomic tests === Running

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2024-03-15 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #33 from

[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments

2024-03-15 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.0|13.3

[Bug fortran/110826] Fortran array of derived type with a pointer to function with dimensional arguments fails

2024-03-15 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110826 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

[gcc r13-8443] Fortran: improve checks of NULL without MOLD as actual argument [PR104819]

2024-03-15 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90442fb421823153c4f762a2d26a0d700af2e6c3 commit r13-8443-g90442fb421823153c4f762a2d26a0d700af2e6c3 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Fri Mar 1 19:21:27 2024 +0100 Fortran: improve checks of NULL without MOLD as actual argument [PR104819] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

[Bug fortran/110826] Fortran array of derived type with a pointer to function with dimensional arguments fails

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110826 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e9f475cdc8617f94c903656faaf28910c21c29b commit r13-8445-g4e9f475cdc8617f94c903656faaf28910c21c29b Author: Harald Anlauf

[gcc r13-8445] Fortran: handle procedure pointer component in DT array [PR110826]

2024-03-15 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e9f475cdc8617f94c903656faaf28910c21c29b commit r13-8445-g4e9f475cdc8617f94c903656faaf28910c21c29b Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Mar 11 22:05:51 2024 +0100 Fortran: handle procedure pointer component in DT array [PR110826] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337dc58139595bd9ab4101b988078c5d54d8506a commit r13-8444-g337dc58139595bd9ab4101b988078c5d54d8506a Author: Harald Anlauf

[gcc r13-8444] Fortran: allow RESTRICT qualifier also for optional arguments [PR100988]

2024-03-15 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337dc58139595bd9ab4101b988078c5d54d8506a commit r13-8444-g337dc58139595bd9ab4101b988078c5d54d8506a Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Dec 4 22:44:53 2023 +0100 Fortran: allow RESTRICT qualifier also for optional arguments [PR100988] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

[Bug fortran/104819] Reject NULL without MOLD as actual to an assumed-rank dummy

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90442fb421823153c4f762a2d26a0d700af2e6c3 commit r13-8443-g90442fb421823153c4f762a2d26a0d700af2e6c3 Author: Harald Anlauf

[gcc r13-8442] testsuite: fortran: fix invalid testcases (missing MOLD argument to NULL)

2024-03-15 Thread Harald Anlauf via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba4b4b3864d426835ea10e900a4e1dd466d06e51 commit r13-8442-gba4b4b3864d426835ea10e900a4e1dd466d06e51 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Wed Nov 22 21:45:46 2023 +0100 testsuite: fortran: fix invalid testcases (missing MOLD argument to NULL) The Fortran standard

[Bug fortran/104819] Reject NULL without MOLD as actual to an assumed-rank dummy

2024-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba4b4b3864d426835ea10e900a4e1dd466d06e51 commit r13-8442-gba4b4b3864d426835ea10e900a4e1dd466d06e51 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug middle-end/113396] [13/14 Regression] csmith: differences from -O2 to -O3

2024-03-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396 --- Comment #17 from David Binderman --- I tried out gcc-13.2 and got the following results: foundBugs $ ~/gcc/results.13.2.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -w -O2 --param=max-inline-insns-auto=23 bug998.c && valgrind -q ./a.out checksum = 77A231E6

C/C++ results under Intel SDE for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [native/master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-testresults
1462 /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64-native/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [native/master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) === g++ tests === Running target sde FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [native/master r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread H. J. Lu via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 15 18:40:05 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9498-ga6dab195f70) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === gcc tests === Running target unix XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72) XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027

Re: [PATCH 6/4] libbacktrace: Add loaded dlls after initialize

2024-03-15 Thread Björn Schäpers
Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100 Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: Björn Schäpers Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: In that case, you an call either GetModuleHandeExA or GetModuleHandeExW, the

Re: [PATCH 6/4] libbacktrace: Add loaded dlls after initialize

2024-03-15 Thread Björn Schäpers
Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100 Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org From: Björn Schäpers Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: In that case, you an call either GetModuleHandeExA or GetModuleHandeExW, the

Re: [PATCH 5/4] libbacktrace: improve getting debug information for loaded dlls

2024-03-15 Thread Björn Schäpers
Am 25.01.2024 um 23:04 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor: On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:53 AM Björn Schäpers wrote: Am 23.01.2024 um 23:37 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor: On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:33 PM Björn Schäpers wrote: Am 03.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb Björn Schäpers: Am 30.11.2023 um 20:53 schrieb Ian

Re: [PATCH 5/4] libbacktrace: improve getting debug information for loaded dlls

2024-03-15 Thread Björn Schäpers
Am 25.01.2024 um 23:04 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor: On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:53 AM Björn Schäpers wrote: Am 23.01.2024 um 23:37 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor: On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:33 PM Björn Schäpers wrote: Am 03.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb Björn Schäpers: Am 30.11.2023 um 20:53 schrieb Ian

[Bug target/113950] PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

2024-03-15 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- The bogus vsx_splat_ code goes all the way back to GCC 8, so we need backports to the open release branches (GCC 13, 12, 11).

Re: [PATCH V3] rs6000: Don't ICE when compiling the __builtin_vsx_splat_2di built-in [PR113950]

2024-03-15 Thread Peter Bergner
On 3/6/24 3:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: > on 2024/3/4 02:55, jeevitha wrote: >> The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. >> >> When we expand the __builtin_vsx_splat_2di function, we were

Results for 14.0.1 20240315 (experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9498-ga6dab195f70] (GCC) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2024-03-15 Thread Bill Seurer (POWER9) via Gcc-testresults
=== gcc Summary === # of expected passes179065 # of unexpected failures132 # of unexpected successes 19 # of expected failures 1614 # of unsupported tests 4201 /home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240315 (ex

[Bug fortran/111781] Fortran compiler complains about variable bound in array dummy argument

2024-03-15 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111781 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #7) > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr98016.f90 -O (test for excess errors) > > Excess errors: > >

  1   2   3   4   >