for discussion: should we close all the Java-related bugs?

Dear all, AFAIK, GCJ has been dead for _years_...  quoting : "As of GCC 7, the GCC Java frontend and associated libjava runtime library have been removed from GCC. The information on this page is kept here for reference but only applies to GCC 6 and earlier." ...

[PATCH] vax: resolve long-standing documentation bugs re floating-point codegen [PR79646]

Howdy, y`all. After many years away from contributing to GCC, I am rejoining as a "gardener": my intent/plan is to clean up the bug backlog, weeding out old bugs that are relatively-easy to fix yet have languished for a long time.  First for today`s gardening: a documentation-only bug or two

Re: Results from SPEC2006 FP analysis done at Richard`s request {late July / early August}

[Alan wrote:] Interesting, thanks. For what kind of architecture are these - You are welcome. You raised 2 or 3 good points, I think. First: the numbers are all from builds on and for the AMD64 ISA, AKA x86_64. My apologies for forgetting to mention that vital fact. Second: I did not

fix PR46029: reimplement if conversion of loads and stores

. Passed regression testing and bootstrap on amd64-linux. Is this OK to commit to trunk? Regards, Abe 2015-06-12 Sebastian Pop s@samsung.com Abe Skolnik a.skol...@samsung.com PR tree-optimization/46029 * tree-data-ref.c (struct data_ref_loc_d): Moved