[Bug target/115118] [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115118 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|15.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/115118] New: [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115118 Bug ID: 115118 Summary: [15 Regression] 5-13% slowdown of 470.lbm on zen4 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection

[Bug target/114412] [14/15 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412 --- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3) > Hi Filip, > > Do you generate these runs with counters based PGO or compiler > instrumentation? > > Just so I know before I start trying to reproduce them.

[Bug target/113832] [14/15 Regression] 6% exec time regression of 464.h264ref on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113832 --- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl --- There was another speedup followed by a slowdown. speedup somewhere between g:4b8e7b57d952a103 g:839bc42772ba7af6 slowdown g:7924e352523b3715 g:f3fdcf4a37a7be07 --- Btw, here is a plot also showing GCC 13

[Bug target/114786] New: ICE in recog.cc: unrecognizable insn while compiling bcd-3.c for power pc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114786 Bug ID: 114786 Summary: ICE in recog.cc: unrecognizable insn while compiling bcd-3.c for power pc Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug sanitizer/114743] ICE in build_check_stmt at asan.cc:2707 while compiling gcc.dg/ubsan/pr112709-2.c with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114743 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug sanitizer/114743] New: ICE in build_check_stmt at asan.cc:2707 while compiling gcc.dg/ubsan/pr112709-2.c with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114743 Bug ID: 114743 Summary: ICE in build_check_stmt at asan.cc:2707 while compiling gcc.dg/ubsan/pr112709-2.c with -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug middle-end/111692] ICE in output_constant at varasm:cc:5267 during RTL "final" pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111692 --- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl --- The same ICE happens with gcc gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx512fp16/m512h/test_passing_structs.c --param=dse-max-object-size=2147483647

[Bug target/112914] ~7-9% exec time regression of 436.cactusADM on AMD Zen2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112914 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] ~7-9% exec |~7-9% exec time regression

[Bug target/114059] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 | sme2 vs -fsanitize=address -mtrack-speculation -fharden-control-flow-redundancy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114059 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/114656] ~5% slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114656 --- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Can you try to revert r14-9692 if that commit isn't the cause? I have tried reverting r14-9692 and that indeed removed the slowdown. The benchmark ran as fast as

[Bug target/114656] New: ~5% slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114656 Bug ID: 114656 Summary: ~5% slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/113017] ICE in delete_unmarked_insns, at dce.cc:653 while compiling gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_9.f90 for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113017 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |ICE in

[Bug middle-end/114628] [14 Regression] ICE in gimple_check_failed at gimple.cc:1337 while compiling bitint-100.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114628 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug middle-end/114628] New: [14 Regression] ICE in gimple_check_failed at gimple.cc:1337 while compiling bitint-100.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114628 Bug ID: 114628 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in gimple_check_failed at gimple.cc:1337 while compiling bitint-100.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/114627] [14 Regression] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug middle-end/114627] New: [14 Regression] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627 Bug ID: 114627 Summary: [14 Regression] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 114414, which changed state. Bug 114414 Summary: 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/114414] 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/114414] 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] 15-18% exec |15-18% exec time slowdown

[Bug target/114481] 14% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114481 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] 14% exec|14% exec time slowdown of

[Bug target/114481] [14 Regression] 14% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114481 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/114481] New: [14 Regression] 14% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114481 Bug ID: 114481 Summary: [14 Regression] 14% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/114414] [14 Regression] 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/114414] New: [14 Regression] 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414 Bug ID: 114414 Summary: [14 Regression] 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug middle-end/112697] [14 Regression] 30-40% exec time regression of 433.milc on zen2 since r14-4972-g8aa47713701b1f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112697 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #10 from Filip Kastl --- I

[Bug target/114412] New: [14 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412 Bug ID: 114412 Summary: [14 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization,

[Bug target/114411] [14 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411 --- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl --- The CPU is Ampere Altra - Neoverse N1.

[Bug target/114411] New: [14 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411 Bug ID: 114411 Summary: [14 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 114268, which changed state. Bug 114268 Summary: [14 Regression] 5% exec time regression in 454.calculix on Aarch64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114268 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/114268] [14 Regression] 5% exec time regression in 454.calculix on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114268 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113832] [14 Regression] 6% exec time regression of 464.h264ref on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113832 --- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl --- It seems that the benchmark runtime returned to normal for a while but then went back to 6% slowdown. Somewhere between these two commits the benchmark sped up g:eb7a8f213d59e0cf g:15d1dae0d4d1be88 And

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #28 from Filip Kastl --- Created attachment 57710 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57710=edit gcda data for himeno I've tried sharing non-SPEC gcda data between machines. I used this benchmark

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #26 from Filip Kastl --- Yes, the "before" is r14-5075-gc05f748218a0d5. I just tried to take the gcda data and use them to compile mcf on another machine. I also ran into output.c:87:1: error: corrupted profile info: number

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #23 from Filip Kastl --- Yeah I also don't know what else to do to make the gcda files work for you :-/ I can send you my compiler binaries but you should have exactly the same if you compile from the same commit (if I'm not

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #21 from Filip Kastl --- Created attachment 57703 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57703=edit gcda data for the commit before robin's commit (v2) Here are the gcda files generated with -march=znver4

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #19 from Filip Kastl --- There's indeed another difference. In my case, gcc gets called with -std=gnu99. Otherwise, I think the options are the same. gcc -std=gnu99 -c -o pbeampp.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DWANT_STDC_PROTO

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #17 from Filip Kastl --- I have this in the SPEC .cfg file: OPTIMIZE = -Ofast -g -march=native -mtune=native -flto=32 So the only difference I see is the inclusion of -g.

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #57699|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #57698|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #13 from Filip Kastl --- Hmm. It will be better to have the gcda data for the Robin's commit and the commit before it. I'll go generate those.

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #12 from Filip Kastl --- Created attachment 57699 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57699=edit gcda data for the commit g:4ea36076d66eea0f - before the change

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #11 from Filip Kastl --- Created attachment 57698 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57698=edit gcda data for the commit g:c3847ca0571e5ace - after the change

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #7) > I built executables with and without the commit (-Ofast -march=znver4 > -flto). There is no difference so it must really be something that happens > with PGO. > I'd

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 114269, which changed state. Bug 114269 Summary: [14 Regression] Multiple 3-6% exec time regressions of 434.zeusmp since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269 What

[Bug tree-optimization/114269] [14 Regression] Multiple 3-6% exec time regressions of 434.zeusmp since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/114281] [14 Regression] Multiple 2-10% exec time regressions of 465.tonto since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114281 --- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl --- > Please don't open more tickets unless you are assuming they do *not* have the > same cause. Alright, noted.

[Bug tree-optimization/114281] New: [14 Regression] Multiple 2-10% exec time regressions of 465.tonto since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114281 Bug ID: 114281 Summary: [14 Regression] Multiple 2-10% exec time regressions of 465.tonto since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114269] New: [14 Regression] Multiple 3-27% exec time regressions of 434.zeusmp since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269 Bug ID: 114269 Summary: [14 Regression] Multiple 3-27% exec time regressions of 434.zeusmp since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114268] New: [14 Regression] 5% exec time regression in 454.calculix on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114268 Bug ID: 114268 Summary: [14 Regression] 5% exec time regression in 454.calculix on Aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/113833] 435.gromacs fails verification on with -Ofast -march={cascadelake,icelake-server} and PGO after r14-7272-g57f611604e8bab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113833 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/114057] [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification with -Ofast -march={znver2,znver4} and PGO after r14-7272-g57f611604e8bab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114057 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] 435.gromacs |[14 Regression] 435.gromacs

[Bug target/114077] New: ICE in do_SUBST at combine.cc with aarch64 crosscompiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114077 Bug ID: 114077 Summary: ICE in do_SUBST at combine.cc with aarch64 crosscompiler Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code,

[Bug tree-optimization/114057] [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification with -Ofast -march=znver4 and PGO after r14-7272-g57f611604e8bab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114057 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] 435.gromacs |[14 Regression] 435.gromacs

[Bug target/114057] [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification on with -Ofast -march=znver4 and PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114057 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com

[Bug target/114057] [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification on with -Ofast -march=znver4 and PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114057 --- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl --- Hm, seems like g:eb619490b01baa2f actually doesn't miscompare. My bad.

[Bug target/114057] [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification on with -Ofast -march=znver4 and PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114057 --- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl --- The oldest commit with this miscomparison i found so far is g:eb619490b01baa2f. The most recent commit without the miscomparison i found so far is g:405096f908e1ceb0.

[Bug target/114057] New: [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification on with -Ofast -march=znver4 and PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114057 Bug ID: 114057 Summary: [14 Regression] 435.gromacs fails verification on with -Ofast -march=znver4 and PGO Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/111457] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-3407-g936a12331a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111457 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #4) > Judging by the graph it looks like it was slow before, then got faster and > now slower again. Is there some more info on why it got faster in the first > place?

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl --- Btw, the slowdown seems specific to PGO+LTO, with PGO or LTO by itself the benchmarks execution times are relatively stable: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=991.60.0=992.60.0=962.60.0

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug target/112879] [14 Regression] 4% exec time regression of 525.x264_r on AMD Zen4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112879 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl ---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 112879, which changed state. Bug 112879 Summary: [14 Regression] 4% exec time regression of 525.x264_r on AMD Zen4 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112879 What|Removed

[Bug target/113600] [14 regression] 525.x264_r run-time regresses by 8% with PGO -Ofast -march=znver4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113600 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/112879] [14 Regression] 4% exec time regression of 525.x264_r on AMD Zen4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112879 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113714] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at redhat dot com,

[Bug lto/113712] [11/12/13/14 Regression] lto crash: when building 641.leela_s peek with Example-gcc-linux-x86.cfg (SPEC2017 1.1.9)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113712 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/113746] [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected enumeral_type, have error_mark in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21458 with missing typename since r14-4796-g3e3d73ed5e85e7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113746 --- Comment #6 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #3) > > Filip, you seem to have commit access (apologies if I'm wrong). If so, you > can change your BZ email to @gcc.gnu.org