http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56825
--- Comment #4 from Evgeny Televitckiy stelek at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
06:41:38 UTC ---
Ye, I thought it was something along those lines. Thanks for the clarification,
now I understand the reason why this paragraph appear in standard.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-04-04 06:41:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Any chance of looking at this before the 4.6 branch closes? If not we can
work
around it locally.
I have analysed the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728
--- Comment #11 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2013-04-04
06:54:22 UTC ---
Agreed then. Thanks for looking into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50211
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50200
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
07:37:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 07:22:24 2013
New Revision: 197468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197468root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Bug #: 56837
Summary: -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns generates incorrect
code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
07:40:15 UTC ---
197374 PASS
197375 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
08:25:08 UTC ---
Reduced testcase for -O3:
struct E {};
struct A
{
virtual void a (void *) = 0;
};
struct B
{
virtual ~B () {};
unsigned int b1;
E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
08:32:35 UTC ---
Testcase
extern C void abort (void);
extern C int memcmp (const void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
bool b1[8];
bool b2[8] = { true, true,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56822
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
08:36:52 UTC ---
You could have simply updated this report instead of creating a new one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
08:38:00 UTC ---
2013-04-04 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
Backport from mainline:
2013-03-28 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #14 from Adam Williams madawilliams at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
08:41:32 UTC ---
Thanks for all your help
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #3 from npl at chello dot at 2013-04-04 09:13:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Fixed for 4.8.1.
Is it already in trunk?
Fixed the ICE or disallowing the wrong constexpr - I guess I have a few of
these?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
09:20:36 UTC ---
Ah, I guess it is sink_clobbers, which would need to be tought to drop MEM_REF
clobbers instead of sinking them if the target bb is no longer dominated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
09:32:14 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 09:31:53 2013
New Revision: 197474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197474root=gccview=rev
Log:
libgfortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-04
09:34:58 UTC ---
If it's fixed for 4.8.1 it's obviously fixed in mainline too. We don't ICE
anymore, we simply reject the snippet due to the reinterpret_cast from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-04-04 09:35:51
UTC ---
The test is failing on ia64:
$ grep basic slp-pr56812.cc.115t.slp
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130404/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc:16: note
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-04-04
09:35:51 UTC ---
The test is failing on ia64:
$ grep basic slp-pr56812.cc.115t.slp
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130404/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc:16: note:
not vectorized: unsupported alignment in basic block.
Does adding
/* { dg-require
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Bug #: 56838
Summary: GCC svn doesn't compile libreoffice 4.0.1.2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Hristo Venev mustrumr97 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.1 |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-04
10:12:11 UTC ---
Manuel, I'm adding the LangEnabledBy, to match the documentation. Thanks.
Now, I'm not sure to understand the existing lines (many):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815
--- Comment #22 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
10:38:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Manuel, I'm adding the LangEnabledBy, to match the documentation. Thanks.
Now, I'm not sure to understand the existing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839
Bug #: 56839
Summary: make check: FAIL: go/types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Hogg jonathan.hogg at stfc dot ac.uk 2013-04-04
10:43:02 UTC ---
Thanks for fixing this. The code in question has been moved to use 'strings'
rather than Hollerith i/o - we aim for it to be F95 compliant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839
Markus mrcs.gcc at mailnull dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839
--- Comment #2 from Markus mrcs.gcc at mailnull dot com 2013-04-04 10:50:02
UTC ---
Build of gcc 4.8.0 with go support worked, but make check failed.
The test which failed is go/types.
In the description is the relevant part of the output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56213
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
11:05:08 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 4 11:03:11 2013
New Revision: 197478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197478root=gccview=rev
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
11:12:56 UTC ---
Testcase:
extern void abort (void);
typedef struct {
int a[3];
int num;
} t1;
t1 B[100];
int A[300];
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
11:24:58 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 11:24:15 2013
New Revision: 197479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197479root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-04-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
11:41:03 UTC ---
Ok, the bug is that 'ncopies' in vect_build_slp_tree is not computed correctly.
I can trivially incrementally improve it but the ultimate fix is to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-04 11:41:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=61be6ebfe22f9ce5799dac2679541911eb744a86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48184
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52436
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 12:07:53
UTC ---
For the rest of the discussion, see the thread starting here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00169.html
In particular, the folding should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
12:28:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
If it's fixed for 4.8.1 it's obviously fixed in mainline too. We don't ICE
anymore, we simply reject the snippet due to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-04
12:50:25 UTC ---
Thanks Jason. Damn, we badly need to restore svn commit logs going
automatically to Bugzilla.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
12:52:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 29803
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29803
gcc49-pr34949.patch
Untested fix (and enhancement too).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56213
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48304
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
Bug #: 56840
Summary: a.out aborts instead of catching exception with -flto
and -static-libstdc++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841
Bug #: 56841
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol
__atomic_exchange_8 in file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/prev-hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56842
Bug #: 56842
Summary: Argument deduction failure note is empty for alias
template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
--- Comment #1 from Werner w...@trash-mail.com 2013-04-04 14:36:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29805
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29805
generated with c++ -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
Bug #: 56843
Summary: PowerPC Newton-Raphson reciprocal estimates can be
improved
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
15:49:00 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 4 15:48:25 2013
New Revision: 197487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197487root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40119
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
15:53:25 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 4 15:52:54 2013
New Revision: 197488
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197488root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-04-04 15:57:16 UTC ---
On 4-Apr-13, at 11:41 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Drat, I completely forgot these still aren't available everywhere,
sorry.
There's some kind of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46501
Joe Turner joe at oampo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joe at oampo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
16:12:31 UTC ---
Regarding the last point, I found this in the user manual:
The double-precision square root estimate instructions are not generated by
default on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
--- Comment #2 from Hristo Venev mustrumr97 at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
16:17:04 UTC ---
The candidate in /usr/include/boost/bind/bind.hpp:1478 a.cpp:92092 fails.
SFINAE so this candidate is skipped.
However the one in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
Bug #: 56844
Summary: Loop condition wrongly optimized from to !=
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04
16:33:50 UTC ---
Smells like http://blog.regehr.org/archives/918
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-04-04 17:24:14
UTC ---
Yes, that will skip the test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
18:27:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 29806
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29806
ICE with -O1 only
$ g++ -Wall -O1 -fpreprocessed -c 56830.ii
56830.ii:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #32 from Kangkook aixer77 at gmail dot com 2013-04-04 18:31:19
UTC ---
Hi, guys
I have a couple of questions regarding the case.
i) What is the current status of the fix? is this fixed or still open?
ii) If it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
18:45:56 UTC ---
strictly speaking this is 'pre-4.8.0' regression
gcc version 4.8.0 20130313 (experimental) [trunk revision 196628] (GCC)
$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-04
18:50:49 UTC ---
You are right, sounds like PR34949
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
Bug #: 56845
Summary: [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 19:23:26 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=197495
2013-04-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/40881
* match.c (gfc_match_return):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
Bug #: 56846
Summary: _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 20:15:07 UTC ---
Huh, funny. I thought we were doing this already.
Also there is a piece of code in gfc_trans_deferred_vars (trans-decl.c) which
claims to do exactly this (AFAICS).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 21:01:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Also there is a piece of code in gfc_trans_deferred_vars (trans-decl.c) which
claims to do exactly this (AFAICS). No idea why it is not in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Bug #: 56847
Summary: '-fpie' triggers - internal compiler error: in
gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4705
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
--- Comment #1 from Han Shen shenhan at google dot com 2013-04-04 23:31:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 29807
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29807
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
incrediball peter at axium dot co.nz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05
05:28:21 UTC ---
Slightly reduced.
struct S { long int a, b; };
extern struct S e;
void
foo (void)
{
static __thread struct S s = { 0, 0 };
s = e;
}
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
