[Bug fortran/87991] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87991 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87991] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87991 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Aug 14 04:38:29 2019 New Revision: 274413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274413=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/87991 *

[Bug fortran/87991] ICE in gfc_constructor_append_expr, at fortran/constructor.c:135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87991 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Aug 14 04:22:31 2019 New Revision: 274412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274412=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/87991 *

[Bug lto/91287] LTO disables linking with scalar MASS library (Fortran only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287 --- Comment #38 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: luoxhu Date: Wed Aug 14 02:18:33 2019 New Revision: 274411 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274411=gcc=rev Log: Enable math functions linking with static library for LTO In LTO

[Bug c++/88095] class nontype template parameter UDL string literals doesn't accepts deduction placeholder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88095 Tom Honermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug driver/91130] [9 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 Tom Honermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at honermann dot net --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/91347] [7/8/9/10 Regression] pointer_string in linux vsprintf.c is miscompiled when sibling calls are optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- I see in dse.c: /* Get arguments passed to CALL_INSN. Return TRUE if successful. So far it only handles arguments passed in registers. */ static bool get_call_args (rtx call_insn, tree fn, rtx

[Bug rtl-optimization/91347] [7/8/9/10 Regression] pointer_string in linux vsprintf.c is miscompiled when sibling calls are optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/90563] [8/9/10 Regression] Out of bounds error when compiling with -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90563 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90563] [8/9/10 Regression] Out of bounds error when compiling with -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90563 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 22:57:31 2019 New Revision: 274406 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274406=gcc=rev Log: 2013-08-13 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/90563

[Bug c++/68301] self-dependent reference member initialization not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68301 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 68301, which changed state. Bug 68301 Summary: self-dependent reference member initialization not diagnosed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68301 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/90563] [8/9/10 Regression] Out of bounds error when compiling with -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90563 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 22:25:32 2019 New Revision: 274405 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274405=gcc=rev Log: 2013-08-13 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/90563

[Bug target/91421] [10 Regression] runtime error: load of value 2463, which is not a valid value for type 'built_in_function' since r274119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/91421] [10 Regression] runtime error: load of value 2463, which is not a valid value for type 'built_in_function' since r274119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Aug 13 21:35:10 2019 New Revision: 274403 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274403=gcc=rev Log: Protect some checks of DECL_FUNCTION_CODE This patch protects

[Bug target/91421] [10 Regression] runtime error: load of value 2463, which is not a valid value for type 'built_in_function' since r274119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Aug 13 21:35:20 2019 New Revision: 274404 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274404=gcc=rev Log: Use checking forms of DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (PR 91421) We were

[Bug fortran/88072] gfortran crashes with an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88072 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/88072] gfortran crashes with an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88072 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 20:38:01 2019 New Revision: 274401 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274401=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88072 * misc.c

[Bug fortran/88072] gfortran crashes with an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88072 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 20:13:59 2019 New Revision: 274400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274400=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88072 *

[Bug fortran/88072] gfortran crashes with an internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88072 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 20:10:25 2019 New Revision: 274399 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274399=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88072 * misc.c

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 90561, which changed state. Bug 90561 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 20:01:43 2019 New Revision: 274398 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274398=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/90361] [9/10 Regression] Undefined symbols in libstdc++ when building with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90361 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, sorry I missed the deadline for 9.2.

[Bug fortran/89647] Host associated procedure unable to be used as binding target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89647 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/89647] Host associated procedure unable to be used as binding target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89647 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 18:49:00 2019 New Revision: 274395 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274395=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/89647 resolve.c

[Bug fortran/90563] [8/9/10 Regression] Out of bounds error when compiling with -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90563 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 18:49:02 2019 New Revision: 274396 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274396=gcc=rev Log: 2013-08-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/90563 *

[Bug fortran/90563] [8/9/10 Regression] Out of bounds error when compiling with -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90563 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 18:43:00 2019 New Revision: 274394 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274394=gcc=rev Log: 2013-08-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/90563 * frontend-passes.c

[Bug fortran/89647] Host associated procedure unable to be used as binding target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89647 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 18:35:33 2019 New Revision: 274393 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274393=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/89647 resolve.c

[Bug fortran/87993] ICE in gfc_constructor_first, at fortran/constructor.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 Bug 87994 depends on bug 87993, which changed state. Bug 87993 Summary: ICE in gfc_constructor_first, at fortran/constructor.c:234 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/87993] ICE in gfc_constructor_first, at fortran/constructor.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 18:27:05 2019 New Revision: 274390 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274390=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/87993 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/87993] ICE in gfc_constructor_first, at fortran/constructor.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87993 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 13 18:06:08 2019 New Revision: 274388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274388=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/87993 * expr.c

[Bug bootstrap/91438] [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Is this related to PR 91404?

[Bug other/91396] Link error when I use -fvtable-verify=std and -static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91396 --- Comment #5 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ctice Date: Tue Aug 13 16:11:20 2019 New Revision: 274386 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274386=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR other/91396 static linke error with -fvtable-verify Fix a bug

[Bug c++/68301] self-dependent reference member initialization not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68301 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- This is a duplicate of bug 19808. There's a patch there that I believe needs just a little more work.

[Bug c/80619] bad fix-it hint for GCC %lu directive with int argument: %wu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80619] bad fix-it hint for GCC %lu directive with int argument: %wu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 13 15:55:40 2019 New Revision: 274385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274385=gcc=rev Log: PR c/80619 - bad fix-it hint for GCC %lu directive with int argument: %wu

[Bug c++/91434] gcc optimization behaviour is inconsistent with -O2 with 4.1.2 and 4.9.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91434 Rajabharathi s changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/80931] ICE on move_alloc in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/91440] New: Precompiled headers regression in 9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440 Bug ID: 91440 Summary: Precompiled headers regression in 9.2 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/90361] [9/10 Regression] Undefined symbols in libstdc++ when building with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90361 --- Comment #11 from Viktor Ostashevskyi --- Cool! Thanks a lot, sad that this doesn't make to 9.2.

[Bug c++/90473] gcc does not call function in comma operator for default argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90473 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed on trunk, will backport to 9.3.

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 15:08:10 2019 New Revision: 274383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274383=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/90561 * trans.h

[Bug c++/90473] gcc does not call function in comma operator for default argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90473 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Aug 13 15:05:48 2019 New Revision: 274382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274382=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90473 - wrong code with nullptr in default argument. *

[Bug c++/91431] Using class template for containers and iterators rather than defining template only for iterators caused a trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91431 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/91426] Different colors for errors with multiple locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- The diagnostic is coming from gfc_define_st_label in gcc/fortran/symbol.c:2711 2711gfc_error ("Duplicate statement label %d at %L and %L", labelno, 2712 >where, label_locus);

[Bug bootstrap/91438] [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/66970] Add __has_builtin() macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- Clang is changing __has_builtin so it recognizes all function-like built-ins, not just the ones starting with "__builtin_". See https://reviews.llvm.org/D66100 This means __has_builtin yields true for

[Bug c++/91431] Using class template for containers and iterators rather than defining template only for iterators caused a trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91431 Hyundeok Park changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/90361] [9/10 Regression] Undefined symbols in libstdc++ when building with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90361 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/61071] Compiling with AddressSanitizer with 4.9 breaks printng some variables in gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071 Krzysztof Kundzicz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32739|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/90361] [9/10 Regression] Undefined symbols in libstdc++ when building with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90361 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Aug 13 13:14:45 2019 New Revision: 274379 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274379=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90361 add missing macro definition The src/c++17/string-inst.cc file

[Bug bootstrap/91438] [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Probably r274238 is fine. I was wrong, the revision is also affected.

[Bug sanitizer/61071] Compiling with AddressSanitizer with 4.9 breaks printng some variables in gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071 --- Comment #5 from Krzysztof Kundzicz --- (In reply to Johannes Altmanninger from comment #4) > I can't reproduce this on Arch Linux, perhaps it is fixed by now? > > Linux 5.2.2 > gcc 9.1.0 > gdb 8.3 > glibc 2.29 > binutils 2.32 Just increase

[Bug tree-optimization/91435] Better induction variable for vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/91439] Wrong debug information with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91439 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > OK, so all testcases in this PR use 'int' which means disabling > for !natural_alignment_32 would be enough (unless 'int' is not 32bit ;)) I'd assume

[Bug sanitizer/91439] New: Wrong debug information with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91439 Bug ID: 91439 Summary: Wrong debug information with -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- ... and this Index: trans-expr.c === --- trans-expr.c(Revision 274370) +++ trans-expr.c(Arbeitskopie) @@ -10796,7 +10796,13 @@

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- This Index: trans-expr.c === --- trans-expr.c(Revision 274370) +++ trans-expr.c(Arbeitskopie) @@ -10796,7 +10796,13 @@

[Bug c++/91429] Conditional explicit not respected with out-of-line definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91429 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91431] Using class template for containers and iterators rather than defining template only for iterators caused a trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91431 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2

[Bug sanitizer/61071] Compiling with AddressSanitizer with 4.9 breaks printng some variables in gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071 Johannes Altmanninger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aclopte at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/91434] gcc optimization behaviour is inconsistent with -O2 with 4.1.2 and 4.9.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91434 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This code has undefined behaviour: int main() { FSPI pi; FSPG* pg = new FSPG(); new (_a) FSPGI(pg); pi.m_a.~FSPGI(); return 0; } pi.m_a is part of an object on the stack, so its destructor will

[Bug bootstrap/91438] [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/91436] Confusing suggestion to include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91436 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/91434] gcc optimization behaviour is inconsistent with -O2 with 4.1.2 and 4.9.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91434 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/91438] New: [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438 Bug ID: 91438 Summary: [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug bootstrap/91438] [10 Regression] Profiledbootstrap broken on i586 in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2019-8-13 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- The ICE already occurs for program p character(:), allocatable :: z(:) z = z(2) end (invalid code, but shorter :-)

[Bug testsuite/91437] New: Problem with multi-line test outputs on x86_64-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91437 Bug ID: 91437 Summary: Problem with multi-line test outputs on x86_64-w64-mingw32 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81800] [8/9 regression] on aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be inlined as two instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[8/9/10 regression] on

[Bug target/81800] [8/9/10 regression] on aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be inlined as two instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800 --- Comment #17 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Aug 13 10:46:44 2019 New Revision: 274376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274376=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix PR81800 PR81800 is about the lrint inline giving spurious FE_INEXACT

[Bug c++/91436] New: Confusing suggestion to include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91436 Bug ID: 91436 Summary: Confusing suggestion to include Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/90561] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90561 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/91414] Improved PRNG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91424] Extend warnings about DO loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91424 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/91422] Illegal Fortran in testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/routine-7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91422 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91424] Extend warnings about DO loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91424 Bug 91424 depends on bug 91422, which changed state. Bug 91422 Summary: Illegal Fortran in testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/routine-7.f90 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91422 What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/91422] Illegal Fortran in testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/routine-7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91422 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 10:05:44 2019 New Revision: 274369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274369=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/91424

[Bug fortran/91424] Extend warnings about DO loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91424 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 13 10:05:44 2019 New Revision: 274369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274369=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-13 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/91424

[Bug tree-optimization/91435] Better induction variable for vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91435 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #0) > If we are only ever going to use x+2, why not use that instead, initialize > with {2,3,4,...}, and skip the +2 at every iteration? Or since we have another variable

[Bug tree-optimization/91435] New: Better induction variable for vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91435 Bug ID: 91435 Summary: Better induction variable for vectorization Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91434] New: gcc optimization behaviour is inconsistent with -O2 with 4.1.2 and 4.9.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91434 Bug ID: 91434 Summary: gcc optimization behaviour is inconsistent with -O2 with 4.1.2 and 4.9.4 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/91423] address-of-packed-member when taking packed struct member by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91423 --- Comment #5 from Anders Schau Knatten --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Vec size = s.size; > > you are invoking the copy constructor here ... > Which means you are taking the address (implicitly). Good point. This should be

[Bug fortran/91414] Improved PRNG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Tue Aug 13 09:04:18 2019 New Revision: 274365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274365=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/91414 Bugfix for previous commit Correctly fill master_seed from

[Bug fortran/91414] Improved PRNG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Tue Aug 13 09:02:25 2019 New Revision: 274364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274364=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/91414 Correctly fill master_state from os_seed. Modified:

[Bug fortran/91414] Improved PRNG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Tue Aug 13 09:00:46 2019 New Revision: 274363 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274363=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/91414 Improve initialization of PRNG As part of PR 91414 an improved

[Bug middle-end/91433] Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91433 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug fortran/91414] Improved PRNG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Tue Aug 13 08:42:43 2019 New Revision: 274362 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274362=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/91414 Improve initialization of PRNG As part of PR 91414 an improved

[Bug c++/91431] Using class template for containers and iterators rather than defining template only for iterators caused a trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91431 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction

[Bug c/91433] New: Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91433 Bug ID: 91433 Summary: Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91414] Improved PRNG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91414 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Tue Aug 13 08:24:43 2019 New Revision: 274361 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274361=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/91414: Improved PRNG Update the PRNG from xorshift1024* to xoshiro256**

[Bug c/91432] gcc -Wimplicit-fallthrough does not warn when fallthrough to break;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- The warning basically says "you may have forgotten 'break;'". If it falls through to break anyway, what difference does it make if I add a redundant break?

[Bug tree-optimization/91109] [10 regression][arm] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails since r273135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91109 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger --- I can reproduce with trunk: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -S -O2 -mthumb -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin 20040709-1.c but not with -O3 -g, neither with gcc-9 and my fix applied. Nevertheless it is quite obvious

[Bug c/91432] New: gcc -Wimplicit-fallthrough does not warn when fallthrough to break;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432 Bug ID: 91432 Summary: gcc -Wimplicit-fallthrough does not warn when fallthrough to break; Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 > > --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- > > (In reply to Richard Biener from

  1   2   >