https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104406
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Almost positive this is a dup of bug 31485
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104407
Bug ID: 104407
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure
(length) w/ -std=c++17 -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104405
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am almost positive there are duplicates of this bug already. It is similar to
the struct argument passing one too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104406
Bug ID: 104406
Summary: SLP discovery doesn't use TWO_OPERAND nodes as seeds
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104405
Bug ID: 104405
Summary: Inefficient register allocation on complex arithmetic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104404
Bug ID: 104404
Summary: Incorrect CFI_cdesc_t "type" member for assumed-type,
assumed-rank complex dummy arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104398
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513
Feng Xue changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxue at os dot
amperecomputing.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104403
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-05
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104358
--- Comment #2 from qingzhe huang ---
Here are more tests (https://www.godbolt.org/z/5qc8jTGa8) to show that only
msvc is giving the correct result.
It just illustrates the use cases of this definition and why it should be
allowed.
1. By
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104403
Bug ID: 104403
Summary: ICE while optimizing lambda that returns address of a
static variable hidden in a switch
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104402
Bug ID: 104402
Summary: ICE on valid code: in do_jump_1, at dojump.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104401
Bug ID: 104401
Summary: [x86] Failure to recognize min/max pattern using
pcmp+pblendv
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104400
Bug ID: 104400
Summary: [12 Regression] v850e lra/reload failure after recent
change
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85811
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104399
Bug ID: 104399
Summary: Mingw to generate bogus.o on French locale
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104398
Bug ID: 104398
Summary: [c++20] ICE triggered by templated class with base
class containing `using enum`
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104397
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
--- Comment #5 from Alex Hornby ---
(In reply to Alex Hornby from comment #3)
> Created attachment 52356 [details]
> preprocessed source from gcc 10.3.0
done, also captured the source from a failing 11.2.1 build at same system state
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
--- Comment #4 from Alex Hornby ---
Created attachment 52357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52357=edit
preprocessed source from gcc 11.2.1 produced at same time as gcc 10.3.0
preprocessed source
captured at the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
--- Comment #3 from Alex Hornby ---
Created attachment 52356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52356=edit
preprocessed source from gcc 10.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104389
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[12 Regression] HUGE_VAL *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104389
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3763384a1f696260f3ee7bda8c0e7e4ad732ad9
commit r12-7072-gb3763384a1f696260f3ee7bda8c0e7e4ad732ad9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104397
Bug ID: 104397
Summary: Wrong warning message about global static variable in
module(.hpp, .cpp)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> GCC's option is -faligned-new -fsized-deallocation -std=c++98
yeah gcc does not work either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264
--- Comment #9 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
There is a related discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/a/47618530/7325599
And it is noted there that according to [over.ics.rank]/2 just before
[over.ics.rank]/3:
— a standard conversion sequence is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104219
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06e32a5ebf20c11dd31bc2677bede569fef84316
commit r12-7070-g06e32a5ebf20c11dd31bc2677bede569fef84316
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104396
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104396
Bug ID: 104396
Summary: [11/12 Regression] Invalid SIMD intriniscs accepted at
-O1 and above after r11-6794-g04b472ad0e1dc93aba
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #14 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> I think there are two code spots whose pitfalls resulted in the PR.
>
> The first one is in rs6000.cc::legitimate_lo_sum_address_p which permits
> wrong
36 matches
Mail list logo