[Bug c++/83167] decltype((x)) inside lambda is considered odr-use if x is not a reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83167 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I might have seen a dup of this bug before.

[Bug c++/104358] signature of template function with template lambda(converted to function pointer) mistakenly regards it as type of "int"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104358 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107430 Keywords|

[Bug c++/107430] New: [meta-bug] lambda in decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430 Bug ID: 107430 Summary: [meta-bug] lambda in decltype Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: c++-lambda, meta-bug, rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug c++/105583] Syntax error when alias template in requires-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105583] Syntax error when alias template in requires-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||c++-lambda --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug target/107357] [RISC-V]RVV broken with zve32x/f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107357 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/105558] [10 Regression] simple 8-bit integer calculation fails with -O3 / march=core-avx2 on some gfortran 8/9/10 versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105558 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|simple 8-bit integer|[10 Regression] simple

[Bug target/107357] [RISC-V]RVV broken with zve32x/f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107357 jiawei changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107357] [RISC-V]RVV broken with zve32x/f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107357 --- Comment #2 from jiawei --- Verified, Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/105558] simple 8-bit integer calculation fails with -O3 / march=core-avx2 on some gfortran 8/9/10 versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105558 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > Fixed on master with r11-3718-g91ae6930ed4a87d7. If anything that just made the issue latent I suspect.

[Bug driver/105568] [13 Regression] Superfluous --jobserver-auth= check taints further diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/105616] Using regex_replace throws "maybe-uninitialized" warnings with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105616 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Most likely -fsanitize=address is confusing things. There are a few other bugs which talk about -fsanitize=address and -Wuninitialized interactions too.

[Bug rtl-optimization/101806] Extra zero extends for some arguments in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101806 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this will be fixed/improved by https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602089.html .

[Bug c++/64989] constant-initialization of self-referencing array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64989 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/105619] Wrong "used in its own initializer" with class prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105619 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105162] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] [AArch64] outline-atomics drops dmb ish barrier on __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[AArch64] outline-atomics |[9/10/11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug target/105162] [AArch64] outline-atomics drops dmb ish barrier on __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Known to work|

[Bug target/105627] -fcompare-debug failure at -Og for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Component|debug

[Bug debug/107414] dwarf 5 C macro support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107414 Simon Marchi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca ---

[Bug c++/105631] GCC internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when trying to compile Qt 6.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug c/61469] language feature: Support for enum underlying type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61469 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/105646] g++ does not raise "xxx may be used uninitialized" warning on dead code when optimizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/105653] [10/11/12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105653 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/107426] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_derived_types, at fortran/interface.cc:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/107423] ICE in parse_spec, at fortran/parse.cc:4017

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107423 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-10-27

[Bug rtl-optimization/105661] Comparisons to atomic variables generates less efficient code

rnally for RTL level we do atomic loads as volatile memory. (insn 5 4 0 (set (reg:QI 83 [ _5 ]) (mem/v:QI (symbol_ref:DI ("atomic") [flags 0x2] ) [-1 S1 A8])) "/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20221026/include/c++/13.0.0/bits/atomic_base.h":505:24 -1 (nil))

[Bug rtl-optimization/105661] Comparisons to atomic variables generates less efficient code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105661 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||50677 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/105686] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 8 with -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105686 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Btw. 2092f134b7180cd2542cff93bd8a876b3e59a77b revision made it visible. r10-358-g2092f134b7180c

[Bug debug/107414] dwarf 5 C macro support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107414 --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Drepper --- Actually, Jakub was right. This is a gdb issue. The gdb maintainers pointed me to the trunk version and this indeed works with this simple code sequence. There might have been a bug as in 107012 but

[Bug c++/107428] trying to define a partial specialized concept does not give a good error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107428 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/99435] avr: incorrect I/O address ranges for some cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99435 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- I am really confused. To all of my knowledge, IN and OUT can address a range of 64 bytes. For example, the opcode of OUT is 1011 1AAr where "r" bits encode for the register number (2^5 = 32

[Bug c++/107429] New: misdiagnosed "constraint depends on itself" in overloaded functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107429 Bug ID: 107429 Summary: misdiagnosed "constraint depends on itself" in overloaded functions Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107428] New: trying to define a partial specialized concept does not give a good error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107428 Bug ID: 107428 Summary: trying to define a partial specialized concept does not give a good error message Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/103474] ICE in simplify_cobound, at fortran/simplify.c:4415

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103474 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am now stuck with the following code, which I believe is valid. (It is accepted by Crayftn and rejected by Intel, but I thought it is covered by F2018:5.4.7(5)): program p type t

[Bug c++/105693] Requires-clause constructor that is deleted is not overriding the "= default" one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Requires-clause constructor |Requires-clause constructor

[Bug c++/105693] Requires-clause constructor is not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/103975] DWARF .debug_frame incorrect for ISRs on AVR; pushing SREG creates off-by-one error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103975 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- If someone is going to fix this, the following changes might also play a role: * v8+ may emit optimized ISR prologues / epilogues using PR81268: gcc will just emit pseudo-instruction __gcc_isr which

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7d28818179247685f3c101f9f2f16366f56309b commit r13-3513-gf7d28818179247685f3c101f9f2f16366f56309b Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:22:47PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > > --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Submitted:

[Bug tree-optimization/107427] ICE Segmentation fault when -O1 -fdisable-tree-lower -fdisable-tree-eh is given

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107427 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107427] New: ICE Segmentation fault when -O1 -fdisable-tree-lower -fdisable-tree-eh is given

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107427 Bug ID: 107427 Summary: ICE Segmentation fault when -O1 -fdisable-tree-lower -fdisable-tree-eh is given Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/79469] Feature request: provide `__builtin_assume` builtin function to allow more aggressive optimizations and to match clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79469 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug other/79469] Feature request: provide `__builtin_assume` builtin function to allow more aggressive optimizations and to match clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79469 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Now the assume for C++23's assume attribute has been added, adding this builtin should be straight forward I think. Because the builtin is exactly the same as the attribute in that the expression supplied

[Bug fortran/107426] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_derived_types, at fortran/interface.cc:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #18) > (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #16) > > For Darwin, PPC intrinsics already is there in Apple headers. Can it be > > added into current GCC? > >

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe --- the patch above does not seek to answer questions on validity - it simply publishes the same header that was made available in the darwin toolchains (so will be neither better nor worse than that)>

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12) > > pr103413-boz.f90:4:6: > > > > 4 | r = z'1234' > > | 1 > > Error: BOZ literal constant at (1) is neither a DATA statement value

[Bug c++/107422] [12/13 Regression] ICE in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.cc:293

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107422 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-10-26 CC|

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 53779 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53779=edit introduce ppc_intrinsics.h for powerpc*-darwin. This takes the header from the GCC-4.x apple debt branch (as present

[Bug c++/106393] Add warnings for common dangling problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106393 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106393] Add warnings for common dangling problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106393 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2249cd9adf5ae638577139177a50f7e62d8abd9 commit r13-3511-gd2249cd9adf5ae638577139177a50f7e62d8abd9 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/95148] -Wtype-limits always-false warning triggered despite comparison being avoided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95148 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > I should not be getting this warning, because when x is unsigned, the > > comparison is never performed, due to the short-circuit semantics of `and`. > >

[Bug c++/107417] g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:24:04PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 > > --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to kargl

[Bug tree-optimization/107413] Perf loss ~14% on 519.lbm_r SPEC cpu2017 benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107413 --- Comment #3 from Rama Malladi --- I will get the effect of this revert for the overall SPEC FP score. I haven't tried experimenting with fp_reassoc_width values. Will try it and update.

[Bug analyzer/106703] during IPA pass: analyzer ICE: error reporting routines re-entered. with -fanalyzer -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope -fsanitize=kernel-address -fdiagnostics-format=sarif-stderr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106703 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Looks like a dup of 107366; possibly fixed by r13-3469-g2e8a0553918adc919f98ac5c0224fc6ce1fef68d.

[Bug fortran/107426] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_derived_types, at fortran/interface.cc:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426 Bug ID: 107426 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_derived_types, at fortran/interface.cc:636 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/107425] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107425 Bug ID: 107425 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/107424] New: [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.cc:5397

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107424 Bug ID: 107424 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.cc:5397 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/107423] New: ICE in parse_spec, at fortran/parse.cc:4017

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107423 Bug ID: 107423 Summary: ICE in parse_spec, at fortran/parse.cc:4017 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/107422] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.cc:293

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107422 Bug ID: 107422 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.cc:293 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > Well, a boz is typeless, so it cannot be compatible with any other type. > So, I would assume, you could do > > if (ts1->type == BT_BOZ || ts2->type ==

[Bug middle-end/107411] trivial-auto-var-init=zero invalid uninitialized variable warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/107299] [13 regression] ICE in stage 1 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 107420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/107420] [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107420 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/107420] [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107420 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- Can this be reproduced on a cross? Could you provide a preprocessed source?

[Bug c/107405] [13 Regression] enum change causing Linux kernel to fail to build due to Linux depending on old behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405 --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If the real issue in a particular place in the kernel is that a single (anonymous) enum type is being used for lots of different kinds of constants, then the appropriate fix in the

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #25 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 26 Oct 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > Seems LLVM currently only supports _BitInt up to 128, which is kind of useless > for users, those sizes can be easily

[Bug rtl-optimization/97684] [11 Regression] ICE in reg_preferred_class, at reginfo.c:789 by r11-4577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684 Torbjörn SVENSSON changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torbjorn.svensson at foss dot st.c

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.meier at hexagon dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/107415] RISCV-gcc: Leaf function compiles as recursive with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107415 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/107353] frontends sometimes select wrong (too strong) TLS access model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13 regression] Numerous|frontends sometimes select

[Bug tree-optimization/107407] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-383-g32955416d8040b1f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107407 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|12.3

[Bug fortran/107421] New: problematic interaction of 'common' and 'threadprivate'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107421 Bug ID: 107421 Summary: problematic interaction of 'common' and 'threadprivate' Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp

[Bug bootstrap/107420] [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107420 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug c/107405] [13 Regression] enum change causing Linux kernel to fail to build due to Linux depending on old behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|enums can be wrongly long |[13 Regression] enum change

[Bug bootstrap/107420] New: [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107420 Bug ID: 107420 Summary: [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/107012] [debug, dwarf-5] Missing line information for evaluating macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107012 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/107419] New: attributes are ignored when selecting TLS model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107419 Bug ID: 107419 Summary: attributes are ignored when selecting TLS model Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/106433] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106433 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- JFTR, I believe I can reproduce the same issue on x86_64 w/ the current gcc 13.0.0 20221023 (g:0e37fd4dc74c1db99cdc7d71ef378e1221253c6f) snapshot: int m; int *p; __attribute__ ((simd)) int bar (int x) {

[Bug c++/107417] g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after r13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82e629c26647313be406c41a01e6868cfad0f289 commit r13-3509-g82e629c26647313be406c41a01e6868cfad0f289 Author: Alexander Monakov

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #16) > For Darwin, PPC intrinsics already is there in Apple headers. Can it be > added into current GCC? If it is in the Apple headers already, why would you

[Bug lto/107418] lto-dump -gimple-stats Segmentation Fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107418 --- Comment #1 from Volker Weißmann --- If you don't like that I enabled -flto, but disabled the optimizer, tell me, then I minify another example that triggers the same segfault, even if -Os is given.

[Bug lto/107418] New: lto-dump -gimple-stats Segmentation Fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107418 Bug ID: 107418 Summary: lto-dump -gimple-stats Segmentation Fault Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130 Tomas Kalibera changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #52007|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/107417] New: g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417 Bug ID: 107417 Summary: g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in requires-expression Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #16) > For Darwin, PPC intrinsics already is there in Apple headers. Can it be > added into current GCC? There is a version of the header on the FSF Apple branch,

[Bug target/93177] PPC: Missing many useful platform intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93177 --- Comment #16 from Sergey Fedorov --- For Darwin, PPC intrinsics already is there in Apple headers. Can it be added into current GCC?

[Bug debug/107416] removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107416 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/107416] A heap buffer overflow was fould in find_section_in_set() of binutils-2.39 (commit 49c843e6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107416 --- Comment #2 from bjchan9an at foxmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Binutils bugzilla is located at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ . Sorry, can you delete this report? We will report it to binutils bugzilla.

[Bug debug/107416] A heap buffer overflow was fould in find_section_in_set() of binutils-2.39 (commit 49c843e6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107416 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Binutils bugzilla is located at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ .

[Bug debug/107416] New: A heap buffer overflow was fould in find_section_in_set() of binutils-2.39 (commit 49c843e6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107416 Bug ID: 107416 Summary: A heap buffer overflow was fould in find_section_in_set() of binutils-2.39 (commit 49c843e6) Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/107415] RISCV-gcc: Leaf function compiles as recursive with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107415 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meier --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Gcc can detect memset and optimize it to memset. And this is what is > happening. > This is documented too. Thanks for your quick reply. I understand what is

[Bug tree-optimization/107415] RISCV-gcc: Leaf function compiles as recursive with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107415 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130 --- Comment #11 from Tomas Kalibera --- (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #10) > (In reply to Tomas Kalibera from comment #7) > > I sent an updated version for the trunk, 12, 11 and 10 to the gcc-patches > > mailing list in May: > > > >

[Bug c/107415] New: RISCV-gcc: Leaf function compiles as recursive with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107415 Bug ID: 107415 Summary: RISCV-gcc: Leaf function compiles as recursive with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107413] Perf loss ~14% on 519.lbm_r SPEC cpu2017 benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107413 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

  1   2   >