https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
Adam Belay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abelay at mit dot edu
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112327
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112327
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a0af6e5a99cd895a663f0221c25321ae802413f
commit r14-5067-g1a0af6e5a99cd895a663f0221c25321ae802413f
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Wed Nov 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109933
--- Comment #13 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Created attachment 56487
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56487=edit
Proposed fix
Hi Rory,
Sorry that this slipped off my plate for way too long.
I just got around to refactoring
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80b1a371008c31982d35cff9b85ca6affd3ac949
commit r14-5063-g80b1a371008c31982d35cff9b85ca6affd3ac949
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112319
--- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Patch sent for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/634931.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71219
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d880e093d92084f55b10626610ef059fd9194a6a
commit r14-5059-gd880e093d92084f55b10626610ef059fd9194a6a
Author: Martin Uecker
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112343
Bug ID: 112343
Summary: [14 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: dse
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111653
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112342
Bug ID: 112342
Summary: Crash when an unexpected ampersand is encountered
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341
Bug ID: 112341
Summary: error: insufficient contextual information to
determine type on co_await result in function template
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112340
Bug ID: 112340
Summary: [14 regression] assembler instruction counts off for
gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550_1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
oop-optimizations]
6 | for (b = 1; b; b++)
|~^~
small.c:6:17: note: within this loop
6 | for (b = 1; b; b++)
| ^
tkoenig@gcc188:~> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) [master r13-4915-g9b111debbfb]
Copyright (C) 202
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110694
Roman Žilka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roman.zilka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109740
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Goomenuk ---
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/using_declaration
# In class definition
...
If the derived class already has a member with the same name, parameter list,
and qualifications, *the derived
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112339
Bug ID: 112339
Summary: ICE with namespaced attribute on function
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109740
Alexander Goomenuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emerg.reanimator at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112338
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
My bet it is not described ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111921
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112338
Bug ID: 112338
Summary: ieee_set_halting_mode only affects the master thread
outside of an OpenMP parallel region
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106884
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
PR 111000 was similar one but for LIM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112335
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
__old_p_6 = MEM[(struct s * &)ps1_2(D)];
MEM[(struct s * &)ps1_2(D)] = 0B;
if (__old_p_6 != 0B)
goto ; [53.47%]
else
goto ; [46.53%]
[local count: 574129752]:
s::~s (__old_p_6);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
Bug ID: 112337
Summary: arm: ICE in arm_effective_regno
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111835
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Siarhei Volkau from comment #3)
> I don't think that it is duplicate of the bug 104387 because there's only
> one store.
> And this bug is simply disappears if we change the source code a bit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well sizes than 128 that is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Bug ID: 112336
Summary: ICE in gen_reg_rtx emit-rtl.cc:1208 while compiling
"unsigned _BitInt(1) Foo;" with -fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107513
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> The patch for PR 96780 added -ffold-simple-inlines which works for some
> specific functions. This attribute would extend that to arbitrary functions.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70954
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Wmisleading-indentation|-Wmisleading-indentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104387
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2)
> While you (Gaius) here report test failure, similar to what Maciej had
> reported in PR112091 "rs6000: redefinition of 'constexpr long double
> std::abs(long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112335
Bug ID: 112335
Summary: missed optimization on reset and assign unique_ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112334
Bug ID: 112334
Summary: ICE in gen_untyped_return arm.md:9197 while compiling
harden-cfr-bret.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112263
--- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Sorry, made the (almost) full exercise:
read the doc in
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/stacktrace_entry
and the code in stacktrace header file and in
libstdc++-v3/src/c++23/stacktrace.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I confirm that the fix also fixes original python-3.11.6 build failure. Thank
you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98608
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
PATCH (but unclear about n == 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/634896.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #8 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
I'm sorry, I also didn't fully understand these bugs, my friend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) (GCC)
[513] %
[513] % gcctk -O3 -g small.c
during GIMPLE pass: ccp
small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112263
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente ---
so if I add to
std::cout << std::stacktrace::current() << '\n';
I get what needed
Dl_info dlinfo;
for (auto & entry : std::stacktrace::current() ) {
dladdr((const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f3a1937a2b87ebe5f3c1bf2ceec48bfbcd4ccf
commit r14-5056-g64f3a1937a2b87ebe5f3c1bf2ceec48bfbcd4ccf
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index 35d073c9a21..75c75f610c2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -25748,7 +25748,7 @@ (define_peephole2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1)
> Slightly shorter example:
>
> typedef union {
> double d;
> int L[2];
> } U;
> void d2b(int*);
> void _Py_dg_dtoa(double dd) {
> int be;
> U u;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112332
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Slightly shorter example:
typedef union {
double d;
int L[2];
} U;
void d2b(int*);
void _Py_dg_dtoa(double dd) {
int be;
U u;
u.d = dd;
if (()->L[1])
d2b();
}
rom gcc/specs
COLLECT_GCC=./gcc/xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=gcc/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/configure --disable-bootstrap
--disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #5)
> The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89e5d902fc55ad375f149f25a84c516ad360a606
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] LoongArch: |[14 Regression] LoongArch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #7)
> Uh, I also thought about this gcc and binutils matching issue when I
> submitted r14-4674, but I didn't think about whether this should be solved?
> How to fix it？
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #7 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #6)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> > > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112331
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
I suspect it is SRA issue again ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > (In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112331
Bug ID: 112331
Summary: middle-end: Fail vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #5 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> > >
> > > > I guess the easiest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> >
> > > I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #116 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9693459e030977d6e906ea7eb587ed09ee4fddbd
commit r14-5054-g9693459e030977d6e906ea7eb587ed09ee4fddbd
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #3 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
>
> > I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
> > bootstrapping GCC 14 on LoongArch to 2.42.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 56483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56483=edit
The generated assembly triggering the GAS internal error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> I guess the easiest solution is raising the minimal GAS requirement of
> bootstrapping GCC 14 on LoongArch to 2.42.
Another solution might be default to -mno-relax if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
Bug ID: 112330
Summary: [14 Regression] LoongArch: LTO bootstrap failure with
GAS 2.41
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70954
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #115 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56482=edit
modula2: proposed fix to fix largeconst.mod
Here is a patch set for the modula2 fe which re-implements the ZTYPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112329
Bug ID: 112329
Summary: Faulty arithmetic comparison in O2, O3 of s390x-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code seems to be:
int allchars, palsetup_p, palsetup_b, palsetup_e;
int *palsetup_palette;
void palsetup() {
int g;
char *s;
switch (palsetup_p)
case 6:
s = allchars;
g = 0;
for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111720
--- Comment #27 from Li Pan ---
Hi Richard and Juzhe.
I investigated this issue recently and noticed that it may be related to the
array size of the constant memory. Assume we have 2 functions as below.
vuint8m1_t fn_0 () {
uint8_t
version 14.0.0 20231101 (experimental) (GCC)
[546] %
[546] % gcctk -O2 small.c
during GIMPLE pass: ch_vect
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:21:5: internal compiler error: in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1069
21 | int main() {
| ^~~~
0x8736bd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112320
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> What target?
Sorry, I should have mentioned x86_64.
In my opinion, bugs in the middle end tend to occur on all targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112328
Bug ID: 112328
Summary: ice in rdg_vertex_for_stmt, at
tree-loop-distribution.cc:418
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111835
--- Comment #3 from Siarhei Volkau ---
I don't think that it is duplicate of the bug 104387 because there's only one
store.
And this bug is simply disappears if we change the source code a bit.
e.g.
- change (int8_t)*src; to *(int8_t*)src;
or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111384
Siarhei Volkau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104387
--- Comment #4 from Siarhei Volkau ---
*** Bug 111384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112327
Bug ID: 112327
Summary: RVV: Redundant vmv1r for widen reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
84 matches
Mail list logo
