[Bug ipa/114321] [11 regression] ipa/modref: incorrect result with O2 since r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114321 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- > does not clobber ref: ret alias sets: 46->46 Is specificly saying the function does not do any stores that would cause aliasing set 46 to change.

[Bug ipa/114321] [11 regression] ipa/modref: incorrect result with O2 since r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114321 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/114321] New: [11 regression] ipa/modref: incorrect result with O2 since r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114321 Bug ID: 114321 Summary: [11 regression] ipa/modref: incorrect result with O2 since r11-3308 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/64081] [11/12 Regression] r217828 prevents RTL loop unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression] r217828

[Bug rtl-optimization/114261] [13/14 Regression] Scheduling takes excessive time (97%) since r13-5154-g733a1b777f1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114261 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yea, there are various limits on the size of various lists the scheduler maintains. This looks independent of those various clamps.

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #22 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #21) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #20) > > Also failing on LoongArch. > > The testcase from comment 19 or the test? > > Not sure if we should move the comment 19

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #21 from Sam James --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #20) > Also failing on LoongArch. The testcase from comment 19 or the test? Not sure if we should move the comment 19 issue into its own PR?

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #20

[Bug testsuite/114320] New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66108] [CWG 349] incorrect cv-qualification deduction on conversion operator template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66108 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||94404 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/66108] incorrect cv-qualification deduction on conversion operator template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66108 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#349

[Bug c++/114311] Possibly wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114311 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Carlo Wood from comment #5) > Hey Andrew :) > You probably mean https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 > But they are different in that I think that this report is invalid... > See

[Bug c++/114311] Possibly wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114311 --- Comment #5 from Carlo Wood --- Hey Andrew :) You probably mean https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 But they are different in that I think that this report is invalid... See "discussion" here:

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #35 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #34) > Created attachment 57662 [details] > Proposed patch > > This fixes the problem. > > I do not understand the build system to say, that this is the best

[Bug target/63599] "wrong" branch optimization with Ofast in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63599 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.1.0, 6.1.0

[Bug middle-end/61785] Sigsegv with enabled optimize -Os , -O2 in sample_format_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61785 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/114001] is_contiguous considers unlimited polymorphic dummy always as contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114001 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/46993] Optimization on i386 lead to user-visible traps during floating-point operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46993 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED See Also|

[Bug c/83294] int32_t & related definitions wrong with -funsigned-bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83294 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/7a5ec7af-fdbf-470f-9414-bf4110331...@ventanamicro.com/

[Bug c++/86769] g++ destroys condition variable in for statement too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnu4u at flonatel dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/36016] for-loop scoping problem: Method gets called after destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86769] g++ destroys condition variable in for statement too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 57684 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57684=edit Testcase from godbolt

[Bug target/33671] incorrect vector codegen on PPU at O3 level optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33671 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/34038] 176.gcc segfaults when compiled with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34038 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/34038] 176.gcc segfaults when compiled with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -maltivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34038 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00438.html

[Bug c/24414] Old-style asms don't clobber memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24414 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since r14-9193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) > > While ranger has a range_on_exit API this doesn't work on GENERIC expressions > as far as I can see but only SSA names but I guess that could be "fixed"

[Bug testsuite/114320] New: New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320 Bug ID: 114320 Summary: New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/111592] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on expanding argument pack into variadic constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111592 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/110826] Fortran array of derived type with a pointer to function with dimensional arguments fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110826 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81ee1298b47d3f3b3712ef3f3b2929ca26c4bcd2 commit r14-9442-g81ee1298b47d3f3b3712ef3f3b2929ca26c4bcd2 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug middle-end/114319] htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Pali Rohár from comment #3) > --with-arch-32=i686 This basically causes SSE to be disabled for 32bit by default ... With the default options to configure GCC, -m32 for x86_64 still enables sse

[Bug middle-end/114319] htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 --- Comment #3 from Pali Rohár --- For details, here is the compiler which produces the mentioned code: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/lto-wrapper

[Bug middle-end/114319] htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/114319] htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.4.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug rtl-optimization/112560] [14 Regression] ICE in try_combine on pr112494.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112560 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- v3 patch at [1] [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647634.html

[Bug middle-end/114319] htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end Severity|normal

[Bug target/114319] New: htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 Bug ID: 114319 Summary: htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Created attachment 57683 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57683=edit Preprocessed source file. I was able to reproduce the ICE on my x86_64 laptop with the following commands.

[Bug testsuite/114307] [ARM] Vectorization tests not disabled for vector-less targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- The easiest way to fix this testcase is to rename the testcase to O3-pr113576.c and remove the dg-options Though we should audit all of the other ones that use dg-options too: gimplefe-40.c:/* { dg-options

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 --- Comment #5 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Hi Vladimir, The email you got from Linaro CI was about tests the ICE changing "names" due to assert in lra-assigns.cc changing line numbers. E.g., FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v16qi.c -O3 -g

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #14) --- snip --- > The question is whether the following show give an error as shown above: > real :: x(3) > character(len=1) :: s > ... > write(99, '(a)')

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #3) > Hi Vladimir, > > Could you take a look at this, please? I already got a message from automatic linaro tester yesterday about the new test failures and

[Bug testsuite/114307] [ARM] Vectorization tests not disabled for vector-less targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307 --- Comment #5 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Thanks to Christophe L. for explaining the logic behind "is-effective-target arm_neon_ok". The issue is that "/* { dg-options "-O3" } */" in pr113576.c overrides DEFAULT_VECTFLAGS set by

[Bug c++/114309] Undesirable warning with [[unlikely]]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114309 --- Comment #11 from M Welinder --- > Anyway, in GCC's testcase we have: > > 9 if (a == 123) > 10 [[likely]] c = 5; // { dg-warning "both" } > 11 else > 12 [[likely]] b = 77; > Here we have two possible paths, and

[Bug middle-end/114313] ICE: in limb_access_type, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:591 with _BitInt() in a bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114313 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/112652] g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112652 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Given that C++ says e.g. in https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#3.1 > that program is ill-formed if some character lacks encoding in the

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/99829] MVE: ICE in lra_assign at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99829 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug tree-optimization/114318] Missing Optimization after multiple function calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114318 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > That's because main is cold. Or rather known to be called once which causes the path to be considered cold unless there is a loop.

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #9 from Sam James --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #8) > I'd like to help but I'm afraid I cannot send you the SPEC binaries with PGO > applied since SPEC is licensed nor can I give you access to a Zen4 computer. > I

[Bug testsuite/114307] [ARM] GCC generates instruction that assembler rejects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114307 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- What I don't understand is why vect.exp tests run at all for 32-bit ARM non-neon targets. All vect.exp are predicated on check_vect_support_and_set_flags, which, as far as I can tell, has only arm_neon_ok

[Bug ipa/114317] Missing optimization for multiple condition statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114317 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- > (it would need to elide the stores of course). We do have way to elide stores, since we can optimize out write-only values. What we do not have readilly available is the value written to a reference

[Bug ipa/114317] Missing optimization for multiple condition statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114317 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-12

[Bug tree-optimization/114318] Missing Optimization after multiple function calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114318 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/114312] ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in chrec_fold_plus_1 (tree-chrec.cc:336) at -O3 with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114312 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/110167] excessive compile time for std::to_array with huge arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110167 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c6bb36e88d5c8e510b10d12c01e3461c2aa4259 commit r13-8421-g4c6bb36e88d5c8e510b10d12c01e3461c2aa4259 Author: Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/114318] New: Missing Optimization after multiple function calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114318 Bug ID: 114318 Summary: Missing Optimization after multiple function calls Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/114121] wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114121 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73dac51b32575f980289c073969c6d825963d076 commit r14-9440-g73dac51b32575f980289c073969c6d825963d076 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/114317] New: Missing optimization for multiple condition statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114317 Bug ID: 114317 Summary: Missing optimization for multiple condition statements Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 98688, which changed state. Bug 98688 Summary: [modules] does not work on PowerPC with opaque MMA types vector_pair/vector_quad https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98688 What|Removed

[Bug target/98688] [modules] does not work on PowerPC with opaque MMA types vector_pair/vector_quad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98688 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|nathan at

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 98645, which changed state. Bug 98645 Summary: [modules] does not work on PowerPC with IEEE 128-bit long double https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/98645] [modules] does not work on PowerPC with IEEE 128-bit long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98645] [modules] does not work on PowerPC with IEEE 128-bit long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d commit r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/111224] modules: xtreme-header-1_a.H etc. ICE (in core_vals, at cp/module.cc:6108) on AArch64 with SVE types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111224 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d commit r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d Author: Nathaniel Shead

[Bug target/98688] [modules] does not work on PowerPC with opaque MMA types vector_pair/vector_quad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98688 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d commit r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4911de8fb66b3a27659dc75ca6d Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/79534] [11/12 Regression] tree-ifcombine aarch64 performance regression with trunk@245151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79534 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression]

[Bug target/80491] [11/12/13 Regression] Compiler regression for long-add case.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/80899] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with placement new in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/111305] [13/14 Regression] GCC Static Analyzer -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds FP and ICE problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/111160] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on assigning volatile through ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/110141] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/111683] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Incorrect answer when using SSE2 intrinsics with -O3 since r7-3163-g973625a04b3d9351f2485e37f7d3382af2aed87e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/110682] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110682 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/111592] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on expanding argument pack into variadic constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111592 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/111099] [13/14 Regression] -fanalyzer -Os segmentation fault due to infinite recursion in ana::constraint_manager::eval_condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111099 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/82894] [11/12 Regression] Inherited member functions do not create ambiguity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82894 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/111873] [12/13/14 Regression] runtime Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug middle-end/111921] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with nested function after an error since r6-205-g5c4abbb8e80153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111921 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/112709] [13/14 Regression] address sanitize and returns_twice causes an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112709 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/112499] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand with addition of 2 differences of address of labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112499 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug analyzer/113496] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in cmp, at analyzer/constraint-manager.cc:782 with -fanalyzer -fdump-analyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug ipa/112815] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in vague_linkage_p, at cp/decl2.cc:2329 with -flto -fno-weak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112815 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/113141] [13/14 Regression] ICE on conversion to reference in aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/113662] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code for std::sort with fancy pointer since r13-6945-g429a7a88438cc8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113662 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/84204] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/84318] [11/12/13 Regression] attribute deprecated on function templates different than class templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/114316] assert failure with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and empty range of singular iterators passed to std:: algorithm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114316 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- For a debug mode _Safe_iterator pair __valid_range uses this overload: template inline bool __valid_range(const _Safe_iterator<_Iterator, _Sequence,

[Bug target/112548] [14 regression] 5% exec time regression in 429.mcf on AMD zen4 CPU (since r14-5076-g01c18f58d37865)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548 --- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #7) > I built executables with and without the commit (-Ofast -march=znver4 > -flto). There is no difference so it must really be something that happens > with PGO. > I'd

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 114269, which changed state. Bug 114269 Summary: [14 Regression] Multiple 3-6% exec time regressions of 434.zeusmp since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269 What

[Bug tree-optimization/114269] [14 Regression] Multiple 3-6% exec time regressions of 434.zeusmp since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/114312] ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in chrec_fold_plus_1 (tree-chrec.cc:336) at -O3 with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114312 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/114310] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [aarch64] __sync_val_compare_and_swap fails on __int128_t with newval = 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/114308] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/77776] C++17 std::hypot implementation is poor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 --- Comment #22 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- I took your hypot3_scale and reduced latency and throughput. I don't think the sqrtmax/sqrtmin limits are correct (sqrtmax² * 3 -> infinity). TYPE Latency

[Bug sanitizer/112709] [13/14 Regression] address sanitize and returns_twice causes an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112709 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad860cc27b3312f9119c7fecb8638a7c1f6d77c9 commit r14-9438-gad860cc27b3312f9119c7fecb8638a7c1f6d77c9 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since r14-9193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 57681 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57681=edit patch for context sensitive range during SCEV This is the patch I was playing with.

[Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since r14-9193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- So what remains here is differences like - (chrec = {(long unsigned int) (col_stride_10 * _105), +, (long unsigned int) col_stride_10}_2) + (chrec = (long unsigned int) (int) {(unsigned int)

[Bug libstdc++/114316] assert failure with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and empty range of singular iterators passed to std:: algorithm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114316 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >