[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv since r13-7988-g82919cf4cb2321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #17 from Hongtao Liu --- > > > > The to_mpz args look like they could be mixing signs as well: > > I tries below, looks like mixing signs works well. debug show step_expr is -5 and signed. short a = 0xF; short b[16]; unsigned

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- I'm narrowing it down in there, currently several headers deep. I'll finish that tomorrow.

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 --- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > After reading this ancient thread, I don't see anything left to do. Closing. GCC still emits <1>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_base_type) DW_AT_byte_size : 4

[Bug target/114402] rs6000: ICE when long double is ieee128 format by default but without vsx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114402 --- Comment #1 from Kewen Lin --- Currently the only pattern to match IEEE128 comparison is: ;; IEEE 128-bit comparisons (define_insn "*cmp_hw" [(set (match_operand:CCFP 0 "cc_reg_operand" "=y") (compare:CCFP (match_operand:IEEE128 1

[Bug target/114402] rs6000: ICE when long double is ieee128 format by default but without vsx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114402 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:415091f09096a0ebba1fdcd4af8c2fda24cfd411 commit r14-9588-g415091f09096a0ebba1fdcd4af8c2fda24cfd411 Author: liuhongt Date: Mon

[Bug ipa/113996] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICE with LTO at -O2 on Ada code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113996 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/109251] [13 Regression] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in Linux kernel due to check in macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109251 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|[13/14

[Bug analyzer/109251] [13/14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in Linux kernel due to check in macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109251 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9093f275e0a3430e4517e782e7f5419d403113f7 commit r14-9586-g9093f275e0a3430e4517e782e7f5419d403113f7 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug fortran/77517] ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/94377] [PDT] ICE when deallocating a parameterized derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94377 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546 Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state. Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10) > Huh, is this really fixed? IMO, this patch is also needed: --cut here-- diff --git a/gcc/asan.cc b/gcc/asan.cc index cfe83106460..54dcc3a38db 100644 ---

[Bug fortran/103715] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_gsymbol, at fortran/symbol.c:4301 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103715 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103715] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_gsymbol, at fortran/symbol.c:4301 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103715 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7294f1a7aa457fe24d11270f06fd15c2b3ffd4ab commit r11-11287-g7294f1a7aa457fe24d11270f06fd15c2b3ffd4ab Author: Harald

[Bug c++/114409] ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Thanks, I'll play with those...

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Created attachment 57752 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57752=edit EarlyCSE.cpp.ii.xz The bad object seems to be EarlyCSE.cpp.o. Building it with -O0 makes things work.

[Bug c++/114409] ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > > If you can think of a workaround, please let me know, as unfortunately this > > loop is the one where the assert in

[Bug c++/114409] ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > If you can think of a workaround, please let me know, as unfortunately this > loop is the one where the assert in the other bug gets hit :( An easy workaround is

[Bug c++/114409] ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Just an FYI, using unroll instead of novect also ICEs. Let me reduce this and see if it is a regression.

[Bug fortran/103715] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_gsymbol, at fortran/symbol.c:4301 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103715 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:811145b10ff30608bb5ea459ea277219ada4f13d commit r12-10286-g811145b10ff30608bb5ea459ea277219ada4f13d Author: Harald

[Bug c++/114409] ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- If you can think of a workaround, please let me know, as unfortunately this loop is the one where the assert in the other bug gets hit :(

[Bug c++/114409] New: ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409 Bug ID: 114409 Summary: ICE after adding novector pragmas (internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21794) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/110316] [11/12/13/14 Regression] g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C and timevar2.C fail erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110316 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to seurer from comment #6) > Was this only fixed for trunk? I started seeing it for gcc 13: Yes it was only fixed on the trunk. The ICE only happens when -ftime-report is used which most folks

[Bug target/114407] Typo 'enabing' in loongarch-opts.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114407 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/114407] Typo 'enabing' in loongarch-opts.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114407 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:806621dc14f893476dd6f2a9ae5cf773f3b0951b commit r14-9582-g806621dc14f893476dd6f2a9ae5cf773f3b0951b Author: Xi Ruoyao Date: Thu Mar

[Bug middle-end/110316] [11/12/13/14 Regression] g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C and timevar2.C fail erratically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110316 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Was this only fixed for trunk? I started seeing it for gcc 13: g:5b928badac560ad48e0e9fc480096ff396d9d9c6, r13-8468-g5b928badac560a make -k check-gcc

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 --- Comment #6 from Thorsten Glaser --- Oh okay. I have no easy way to check the trunk; gcc-snapshot_1:20240117-1 failed to build (due to an ICE in libgo). In about two days, gcc-14_14-20240315-1 should be built, which I can check then, if

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Also see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934#c11 .

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Thorsten Glaser from comment #2) > Sure? bug 110934 was about =all and using =used fixed the ICE back then. Now > it ICEs in both. Yes it is a dup because it is about the FP registers in the

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Thorsten Glaser from comment #2) > Sure? bug 110934 was about =all and using =used fixed the ICE back then. Now > it ICEs in both. Including on the trunk of GCC?

[Bug target/114358] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2287 on m68k-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114358 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot org --- Comment #2

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #67 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #66) > Created attachment 57750 [details] > Patch comparing jump functions > > I'm testing this patch. (Not sure how to best check that it does not > inadvertently

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #66 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 57750 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57750=edit Patch comparing jump functions I'm testing this patch. (Not sure how to best check that it does not inadvertently

[Bug libgcc/114397] wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114397 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] LLVM|[14 regression] LLVM

[Bug ipa/114254] [11/12/13 regression] Indirect inlining through C++ member pointers fails if the underlying class has a virtual function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114254 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 regression]|[11/12/13 regression]

[Bug ipa/108802] [11/12/13 Regression] missed inlining of call via pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108802 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #47 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b05ee9b69e4644cefbb94a768c4ea302fd44b934 commit r14-9579-gb05ee9b69e4644cefbb94a768c4ea302fd44b934 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #45 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b22a9c7dd29a14a217de8b86d3e100e4e8b7785e commit r14-9577-gb22a9c7dd29a14a217de8b86d3e100e4e8b7785e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #46 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c9d2810908004b7e04599b426aca5ee1bd16735 commit r14-9578-g4c9d2810908004b7e04599b426aca5ee1bd16735 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #44 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:921eb457c5b105bcd84eaeac22067e9b03d5b9d1 commit r14-9576-g921eb457c5b105bcd84eaeac22067e9b03d5b9d1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #43 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22612a8b5e0853c530f98fc7c0d6f6812b36518d commit r14-9575-g22612a8b5e0853c530f98fc7c0d6f6812b36518d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #41 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68eca9b6aefeb40bdd4c55e42528cb32d1e2935b commit r14-9573-g68eca9b6aefeb40bdd4c55e42528cb32d1e2935b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #42 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b089ceb365e5132e4b2a8acfb18127bbee2d0d00 commit r14-9574-gb089ceb365e5132e4b2a8acfb18127bbee2d0d00 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug ipa/114408] New: Crash when invoking strcmp multiple times with -fsanitize=undefined -O1 -fanalyzer -flto

-wrapper: fatal error: /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc returned 1 exit status compilation terminated. /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20240320/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14.0.1/../../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: error: lto-wrapper failed collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Compiler returned: 1

[Bug libstdc++/114401] libstdc++ allocator destructor omitted when reinserting node_handle into tree- and hashtable-based containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114401 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5 Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/114401] libstdc++ allocator destructor omitted when reinserting node_handle into tree- and hashtable-based containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114401 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/89163] Missed optimization: sar and shr equivalent for non-negative numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89163 --- Comment #4 from Kang-Che Sung --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2) > *** Bug 114406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I can't say bug 114406 is an exact duplicate of this one. Although my report mainly addresses right

[Bug rtl-optimization/49330] Integer arithmetic on addresses optimised with pointer arithmetic rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug target/114404] [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114404 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug target/114404] [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114404 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Thanks, cherry-picking https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=a98d5130a6dcff2ed4db371e500550134777b8cf helped both with the minimized testcase and the actual kernel bug. What you describe there

[Bug tree-optimization/114405] ICE: in min_value, at wide-int.cc:344 with _BitInt() bitfield arithmetics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114405 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 --- Comment #13 from Roland Illig --- See also bug 114407.

[Bug target/114407] New: Typo 'enabing' in loongarch-opts.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114407 Bug ID: 114407 Summary: Typo 'enabing' in loongarch-opts.cc Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: translation Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/114395] [c++20+] std::is_constructible_v result of const reference incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114395 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/89163] Missed optimization: sar and shr equivalent for non-negative numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89163 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/89163] Missed optimization: sar and shr equivalent for non-negative numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89163 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Explorer09 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/114406] Optimizations with ">>", div, mod and mul where operands are all positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114406 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv since r13-7988-g82919cf4cb2321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Hongtao

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv since r13-7988-g82919cf4cb2321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #15 from Hongtao Liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #8) > > No fallout on x86 or aarch64. > > > > Of course using false instead of TYPE_SIGN (utype) is also possible and > >

[Bug middle-end/114406] New: Optimizations with ">>", div, mod and mul where operands are all positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114406 Bug ID: 114406 Summary: Optimizations with ">>", div, mod and mul where operands are all positive Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/28277] __builtin_alloca with no limit in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28277 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #21) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #20) > > src/c++11/snprintf_lite.cc (__throw_insufficient_space) > > Another internal impl detail, but this one is

[Bug tree-optimization/114405] New: ICE: in min_value, at wide-int.cc:344 with _BitInt() bitfield arithmetics

--enable-libsanitizer --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-9570-20240320105507-g456e10f28b3-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.1 20240320 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv since r13-7988-g82919cf4cb2321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|14.0

[Bug target/101523] Huge number of combine attempts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523 --- Comment #34 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #1) > This appears to be triggered by try_combine unnecessarily setting back the > position by returning the i2 insn. > > When 866 is inserted into 973 866 still

[Bug testsuite/109596] [14 Regression] Lots of guality testcase fails on x86_64 after r14-162-gcda246f8b421ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109596 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > BTW, just curious, r14-162 had: >/* Ensure that the header will have just the latch as a predecessor > inside the loop. */ > - if

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/114404] [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114404 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv since r13-7988-g82919cf4cb2321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.2.1 --- Comment #13 from Sam James ---

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/114401] libstdc++ allocator destructor omitted when reinserting node_handle into tree- and hashtable-based containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114401 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-20

[Bug libstdc++/28277] __builtin_alloca with no limit in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28277 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #20) > here is the current list as far as I can tell: > config/locale/dragonfly/codecvt_members.cc > config/locale/gnu/codecvt_members.cc >

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- Bisecting.

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [13/14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] Vector: |[13/14 Regression] Vector:

[Bug libstdc++/114400] The resolution of LWG3950 seems incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114400 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Alternatively: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view @@ -602,15 +602,15 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION // deduction and the other argument gets

[Bug c/114404] [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114404 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Created attachment 57745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57745=edit cc1 invocation

[Bug c/114404] [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114404 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Created attachment 57744 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57744=edit preprocessed source

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Better output (includes the assertion failure): ``` $ /home/sam/data/build/llvm-project-test/bin/llc -global-isel -mtriple=amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d -mcpu=gfx900 -stop-after=legalizer -o -

[Bug c/114404] New: [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114404 Bug ID: 114404 Summary: [11] GCC reorders stores when it probably shouldn't Product: gcc Version: 11.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] |[14 regression] LLVM |

[Bug tree-optimization/114403] New: [14 regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 Bug ID: 114403 Summary: [14 regression] Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/114395] [c++20+] std::is_constructible_v result of const reference incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114395 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #10 from

[Bug libstdc++/114400] The resolution of LWG3950 seems incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114400 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- It was simplifying the overload set, consistent with the proposed resolution of 3950. If 3950 breaks existing implementations, then arguably 3950 is wrong and should not be approved.

[Bug libstdc++/114400] The resolution of LWG3950 seems incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114400 --- Comment #4 from Jiang An --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > The resolution of LWG 3950 has not been implemented, at all. Hmm... r14-5349 seems "implementing the resolution" per the commit message. Perhaps I misread

[Bug tree-optimization/114365] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 5 at -O with _BitInt() shift in a bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114365 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/114365] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 5 at -O with _BitInt() shift in a bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114365 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:456e10f28b36aa417e0db145556831c4f979fbd7 commit r14-9570-g456e10f28b36aa417e0db145556831c4f979fbd7 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/114348] Corrupt SARIF output on stderr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114348 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Specht --- Thanks for fixing this! Waiting for the gcc 13 backport. Having formatted json output sounds like a nice feature for me too.

[Bug tree-optimization/114322] [14 Regression] SCEV analysis failed for bases like A[(i+x)*stride] since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114322 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Hao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c276896d646c2dbc8047fd81d6e65f8c5ecf01d commit r14-9569-g4c276896d646c2dbc8047fd81d6e65f8c5ecf01d Author: Hao Liu Date: Wed Mar 20

[Bug bootstrap/114369] tree-vect-loop.cc uses vec_step which is also an altivec intrinsics breaks build when building with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e64228fe1f7ec536da314246eec968aea0d704d commit r14-9567-g5e64228fe1f7ec536da314246eec968aea0d704d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libstdc++/114400] The resolution of LWG3950 seems incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114400 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oops, that was meant to be: #ifdef __cpp_lib_type_identity // C++ >= 20 /** * Identity metafunction. * @since C++20 * @{ */ template struct type_identity { using type = _Tp; };

[Bug libstdc++/114400] The resolution of LWG3950 seems incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114400 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- One option would be to make __type_identity_t an alias for type_identity_t in C++20: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits @@ -156,13 +156,30 @@

[Bug libstdc++/114400] The resolution of LWG3950 seems incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114400 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The resolution of LWG 3950 has not been implemented, at all. The use of __type_identity_t there dates from 2019 (r10-1886-g0d67cd380d37f2) and replaced earlier uses of common_type_t which date from the

[Bug target/114402] rs6000: ICE when long double is ieee128 format by default but without vsx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114402 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-linux-gnu Keywords|

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #65 from Martin Jambor --- I hope to have some jump-function comparison functions ready for testing later today.

  1   2   >