https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114574
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93146
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 109091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100641
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miladfarca at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 51757, which changed state.
Bug 51757 Summary: friend defined inside class and declared inside main linker
error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
Bug ID: 114618
Summary: Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok
when uses " "
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114617
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 57891
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57891=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed fix which stores the result of the relop as a constant.
The fix requires M2Quads to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114617
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114617
Bug ID: 114617
Summary: gm2 is unable to resolve const expression using
relative operators ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||60679
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91798
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually maybe GCC is correct here.
Remove the variadic template:
```
//Get type parameter at given index.
template
struct param
{
static_assert(i > 0, "Index into parameter pack cannot be negative!");
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113951
--- Comment #2 from absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn ---
after sched1 modified the code, ce3 introduced this extra load. un-sched1 code
would not be pessimised by ce3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56908
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114616
Bug ID: 114616
Summary: RFE: show type and possible ranges of size in
-Wanalyzer-tainted-size and
-Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|improve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-01-07 00:00:00 |2024-4-5
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114615
Bug ID: 114615
Summary: spurious warning on mingw-w64: 'memcpy' reading 4 or
more bytes from a region of size 2 with
std::wstring{L""} and -flto -O1 [Wstringop-overread]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97814
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86373
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Clang compiles both of the above examples.
While MSVC rejects both examples.
And EDG rejects the first (can't test the second one though).
Note also EDG, and MSVC also reject the example in the Defect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614
Bug ID: 114614
Summary: New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from
r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114613
Bug ID: 114613
Summary: ALLOCATE with SOURCE forgets to finalize temporary
instances
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114612
Bug ID: 114612
Summary: Deep copy missing for allocatable derived type
components
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114034
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a040eea6b65456625443dcfbf6b21913f2003c8b
commit r13-8589-ga040eea6b65456625443dcfbf6b21913f2003c8b
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611
Bug ID: 114611
Summary: H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95
(or higher)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114610
Bug ID: 114610
Summary: -Wanalyzer-memory-leak reports often far too verbose
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114588
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b02dd48f531ea88587edd2b75b6e5243b4389e8
commit r14-9817-g4b02dd48f531ea88587edd2b75b6e5243b4389e8
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114609
--- Comment #2 from arnaud.lb at gmail dot com ---
I can not think of any location where this warning would make sense for this
code. The warning behaves as if we did this:
```
()->member == 1 ? (_Bool) : (_Bool)0) ? 2 : 3;
```
In this case it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
the fix in trunk, prints the same error as in the
original post:
:5:32: in 'constexpr' expansion of 'std::bit_cast(std::bit_cast(A{1}))'
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20240405/include/c++/14.0.1/bit:94:33: sorry,
unimplemented: '__builtin_bit_cast' cannot be constant evaluated because the
argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88371
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88371
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110402
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lsof at mailbox dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnaud.lb at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114609
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114588
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114609
Bug ID: 114609
Summary: -Waddress false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Target|riscv*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 91079, which changed state.
Bug 91079 Summary: [DR 1881] Standard-layout classes and unnamed bit-fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
--- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill ---
(.BTF+0x88): undefined reference to `a'
^ This is the interesting failure line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b2d3a135a43cbafadd8957e0b2543f38c390437
commit r14-9815-g2b2d3a135a43cbafadd8957e0b2543f38c390437
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Command:
> /scratch/tc-testing/tc-apr-4/build-rv64gcv/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
> -fipa-reference -fipa-reference-addressable -fsection-anchors -gbtf red.c -o
> rv64gcv.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114608
Bug ID: 114608
Summary: [14 Regression] Undefined reference in output asm with
-fipa-reference -fipa-reference-addressable
-fsection-anchors -gbtf
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106500
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925
--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW: r12-5767 backports cleanly to 11-branch and regtests cleanly.
I could push it if there are no objections, so that we can finally close
this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Boulenguez ---
This 3rd attempt does the requested split.
It fixes all build errors on Debian/amd64.
The new Ada.Calendar.Clock returns sensible results.
In other words, it seems ready for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57866|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114247
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
On master this has been fixed by r14-9813-g8cd0d29270d4ed where I
unfortunately copy-pasted a wrong bug number :-/
I assume this needs backporting to at least gcc-13 and gcc-12. I'll do
that in a week or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Oops. I made a mistake, the commit above fixes PR 114247, sorry :-/
This one is the next in my queue. Sorry again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cd0d29270d4ed86c69b80c08de66dcb6c1e22fe
commit r14-9813-g8cd0d29270d4ed86c69b80c08de66dcb6c1e22fe
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114607
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114607
Bug ID: 114607
Summary: aarch64: Incorrect expansion of svsudot
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606
Bug ID: 114606
Summary: -Whardened doesn't trigger with -fcf-protection=none
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, I will do no more work on the old implementation, adjust the broken
testcases, and proceed with getting the my new implementation ready for stage 1
submission. I don't know if I'll be able
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114603
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Monakov ---
It is possible to reduce gcc_qsort workload by improving the presorted-ness of
the array, but of course avoiding quadratic behavior would be much better.
With the following change, we go from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #5)
> Tobias, it looks to me like you missed the connection ...
No, I didn't - I did link it (cf. top of comment 3) — but I just cannot read
:-/
Hence, for
(1) *teams*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112723
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, with -fwrapv. Without -fwrapv the testcase invokes UB always, either the
first c + c overflows or the second one, or the c += -2147483647 - 1;
overflows.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tobias, it looks to me like you missed the connection between the first half of
item (1) in 7.3 (I'm still looking at the 5.2 spec):
"Each trait selector for which the corresponding trait
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114605
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 57889
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57889=edit
gcc14-pr114605.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114603
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67cbb1c638d6ab3a9cb77e674541e2b291fb67df
commit r14-9811-g67cbb1c638d6ab3a9cb77e674541e2b291fb67df
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #4)
> In general we don't yet implement merging of textual redefinitions; I guess
> this ultimately falls under that, but I'm not sure we have a dedicated bug
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114605
Bug ID: 114605
Summary: [14 Regression] wrong code with -march=z13 -O0 since
r14-5831
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114604
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 57887
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57887=edit
BITMAP_ALLOC instrumentation
This is the instrumentation patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11196
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zwuis at outlook dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114602
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c9063825ce726fcbbc067d8a6d062cc2d4acf5e
commit r14-9809-g8c9063825ce726fcbbc067d8a6d062cc2d4acf5e
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114604
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114604
Bug ID: 114604
Summary: Ranger allocates from uninitialized
bitmap_default_obstack
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114566
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a844095e17c1a5aada1364c6f6eaade87ead463c
commit r14-9808-ga844095e17c1a5aada1364c6f6eaade87ead463c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102793
--- Comment #7 from Manolis Tsamis ---
Also submitted in the lists:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/648856.html
I should note that I needed to modify the test uninit-pred-6_c.c and remove
this check:
if (l)
if (n >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102793
Manolis Tsamis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manolis.tsamis at vrull dot eu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114603
Bug ID: 114603
Summary: aarch64: Invalid SVE cnot optimisation
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
