https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115427
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115427
>
> --- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
>
> --- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
>
> --- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115304
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024, ams at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115304
>
> --- Comment #9 from Andrew Stubbs ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #50 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024, Christopher.Nerz at de dot bosch.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
>
> --- Comment #49 from Christopher Nerz
> ---
> Ah, misunderstood and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 31 May 2024, law at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> Agh. I was looking in the main config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 31 May 2024, law at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115298
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> What still doesn't make sense is why nds32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
--- Comment #44 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 23 May 2024, mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
>
> --- Comment #43 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
> I see this issue in SIMD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 22 May 2024, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072
>
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 22 May 2024, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072
>
> --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 17.05.2024 um 16:20 schrieb iains at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138
>
>Bug ID: 115138
> Summary: [15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #64 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 4 May 2024, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
>
> --- Comment #61 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> We used to do the wrong thing in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114908
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 6 May 2024, mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114908
>
> --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
> The stdx::simd implementation in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114774
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114774
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > Yes, DSE walking doesn't "branch" but goes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749
>
> --- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
> Hi, Patrick.
>
> It seems that Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231
--- Comment #35 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231
>
> --- Comment #34 from Richard Earnshaw ---
> To be honest, I'm more concerned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
>
> --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to kugan from comment #12)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 08.04.2024 um 16:55 schrieb tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
>
> --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, douglas.boffey at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
>
> --- Comment #25 from Douglas Boffey ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, douglas.boffey at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
>
> --- Comment #23 from Douglas Boffey ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
>
> --- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus ---
> Created attachment 57896
> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
>
> --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736
>
> --- Comment #16 from Uro? Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92080
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92080
>
> Hongtao Liu changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
>
> --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 11.03.2024 um 20:03 schrieb jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> Patch on comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114252
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114252
>
> --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> The code in the example is not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105533
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105533
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114252
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 06.03.2024 um 17:12 schrieb gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114252
>
> --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114232
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114232
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Either change those too, or the splitter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114232
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114232
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #43 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #41 from Richard Sandiford ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
>
> --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #33 from Richard Sandiford ---
> Can you give me a chance to look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151
>
> --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
> >
> > This was a correctness fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114041
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114041
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I can change the comparison into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
>
> --- Comment #14 from Hongtao Liu ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
>
> --- Comment #11 from Hongtao Liu ---
>
> >Loop body is likely going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
>
> --- Comment #10 from Hongtao Liu ---
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #27 from Tamar Christina ---
> Created attachment 57538
> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114041
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114041
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I thought graphite is done only after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
>
> --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Yeah, I was worried about partial ints.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
>
> --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So, either we could somehow handle that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113476
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113476
>
> --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 15.02.2024 um 19:53 schrieb tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56
>
> --- Comment #21 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
--- Comment #35 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
>
> --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
--- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
>
> --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > > I guess PTA gets around by tracking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
>
> --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So:
> --- gcc/ipa-icf.cc.jj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
>
> --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
> >
> > IVOPTs does the above but it does it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787
>
> --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
> So my understanding is that ivopts does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113852
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, admin at computerquip dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113852
>
> --- Comment #7 from Zachary L ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
>
> --- Comment #16 from JuzheZhong ---
> The FMA is generated in widening_mul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
>
> --- Comment #13 from JuzheZhong ---
> Ok. I found the optimized tree:
>
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Just going from the demangled name of
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113736
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113736
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
>
> --- Comment #18 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
>
> --- Comment #16 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
>
> --- Comment #14 from JuzheZhong ---
> Thanks Richard.
>
> It seems that we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113622
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113622
>
> --- Comment #22 from Xi Ruoyao ---
> On x86_64:
>
> $ cat t.c
> typedef float
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
>
> --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
>
> --- Comment #30 from Richard Sandiford ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
>
> --- Comment #9 from Robin Dapp ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
>
> --- Comment #18 from Richard Sandiford ---
> (In reply to Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
>
> --- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu ---
> diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113583
>
> --- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
> Both ICC and Clang X86 can vectorize SPEC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
>
> --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
>
> --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113551
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113551
>
> --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to Yuxuan Shui from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 23.01.2024 um 18:06 schrieb tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
>
> --- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
>
> --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #14 from JuzheZhong ---
> I just tried again both GCC-13.2 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
>
> --- Comment #12 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113495
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113495
>
> --- Comment #22 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113459
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113459
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
>
> --- Comment #2 from Feng Xue ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082
>
> --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, avieira at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026
>
> --- Comment #4 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Drive by comments as it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, romain.geissler at amadeus dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
>
> --- Comment #25 from Romain Geissler ---
> So it means we should rather
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112303
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112773
>
> --- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp ---
> When I define a vec_extract...bi pattern we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112411
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112411
>
> --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
> Thank you for the evaluation.
>
> - params
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #53 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, post+gcc at ralfj dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
>
> --- Comment #51 from post+gcc at ralfj dot de ---
> Oh great, I love it when one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, muecker at gwdg dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
>
> --- Comment #5 from Martin Uecker ---
> It works (and is required to work) for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111601
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111601
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> r14-4662 still builds ok and r14-4668
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> On ARM32 and other targets methods
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
>
> --- Comment #13 from Alexander Monakov ---
> > Then there is the MULT_EXPR x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
>
> --- Comment #32 from Florian Weimer ---
> There's this in standards.texi:
>
> Most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, bugdal at aerifal dot cx wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
>
> Rich Felker changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111970
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111970
>
> --- Comment #11 from JuzheZhong ---
> Hi, Richard.
>
> I come back to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088
>
> --- Comment #21 from JuzheZhong ---
> Thanks Richi.
>
> Does re-associating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
>
> --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> --- gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc.jj
1 - 100 of 623 matches
Mail list logo