https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115421
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115418
Bug ID: 115418
Summary: [14 regression] Extra movapd emitted for MAX
implementation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115416
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115416
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115406
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] wrong code |[15 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Thanks for the quick fix! We had another issue which bisected to the same, but
it was far harder to reduce so we decided to wait. Hopefully fixed by this too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115387
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115414
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115388
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115398
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Possibly a dupe of PR115397?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Tidied up a bit:
```
struct {
long header_size;
long start_offset;
long end_offset;
} myrar_dbo[5] = {{0, 87, 6980}, {0, 7087, 13980}, {0, 14087, 0}};
int i;
long offset;
int main() {
offset +=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108438
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I forgot to include copies of glib & unittest++ in there, I'll fix that in a
minute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58383
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58383=edit
gcc-PR115396.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115396
Bug ID: 115396
Summary: [15 regression] ICE in canon_file_name with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115395
Bug ID: 115395
Summary: [15 regression] libarchive miscompiled with -O2
-march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
meh:
==2441836== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x59d5f040,
0x78483b50) (undefined)
==2441836== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x59d5f028,
0x78483b68) (noaccess)
==2441836==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115386
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115288
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I should've said, the obvious patch did indeed work for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114532
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
uh, void grub_cmd_distrust(unsigned x) { x = __builtin_bswap32(x); }, obviously
;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115321
Bug ID: 115321
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building grub (extract_insn,
at recog.cc:2812)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115310
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115293
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
We have -Whardened already which is maybe a good fit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 regression]|[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115243
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115236
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O1 and above |[15 regression] Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE when|[15 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
using type = void;
template void checkSwap(T ) noexcept(noexcept(t));
void qSwap(int value1) noexcept(noexcept(checkSwap(value1)));
type callDestructorIfNecessary(int &) noexcept {}
```
As usual,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE when|[15 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
btw, note that toralf hit this on the last snapshot -> it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
No - do you want me to? I can, but I don't have a cache of 15 packages
available, so it might be an hour or two. Just let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115223
Bug ID: 115223
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building KDE kontrast with
LTO (error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ has different
‘TYPE_CANONICAL’)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
typedef unsigned uint32_t;
int cde40_t;
void aal_test_bit();
uint32_t cde40_key_pol();
long cde40_offset_check(uint32_t pos) {
cde40_key_pol();
if (cde40_t)
return pos ?: 0 % 0;
}
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Bug ID: 115221
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building reiser4progs
(propagate_updated_value, at
gimple-range-cache.cc:1368)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109561
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
>From an earlier version:
"""
[22:12] sam_: first difference that matters is between
foo-{good,bad}-foo.c.122t.dse2
[22:12] _9 = __builtin_malloc (4);
[22:12] - _10 = __builtin_memcpy (_9, "foo", 4);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
Bug ID: 115199
Summary: [15 regression] gettext (libtextstyle) testsuite
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115191
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115196
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
See r14-10227-g5b96d547ce71b8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 regression] -O3 |[11/12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58270
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58270=edit
bisect-me.cxx
I'll bisect with attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115191
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
```
typedef void *SCM;
void set_socket_io_ports();
void STk_socket_accept(SCM line_buffered) {
if (!line_buffered)
line_buffered = (SCM)3;
set_socket_io_ports(line_buffered != 1);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115191
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Just -O1 is enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115191
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58267
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58267=edit
socket.i
I'm reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115191
Bug ID: 115191
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building stklos (in
verify_range, at value-range.cc:1526)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(godbolt is great for this, btw)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |ipa
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115056
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88443, 56456
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115154
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
yep, r14-3432-gddd64a6ec3b38e fixed it on trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
PR113652 remains a problem and I guess it's more of a problem for landing this
change in a release, as it means PR113652 will affect more people.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115154
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115154
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I'm bisecting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114927
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58233
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58233=edit
reduced.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
The original is:
```
append_uri_pathel (fname_len_check,
fname_len_check + strlen (fname_len_check), true, _fnres);
[...]
/* Walk the PATHEL string and check how many characters we'll need
to quote.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> ```
> char *c;
> int b, d, e;
>
> static void f(char *g, char *h) {
> char a[1024] = {};
> c = a;
> for (; g < h; g++)
> if (b)
> ++d;
> }
>
> int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
```
char *c;
int b, d, e;
static void f(char *g, char *h) {
char a[1024] = {};
c = a;
for (; g < h; g++)
if (b)
++d;
}
int main() { f("somepage.html", "" + e); }
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Reduced further:
```
enum { a } b;
char *c;
int d, e;
static void f(char *g, char *h) {
char a[1024];
c = a;
for (; g < h; g++)
if (b)
++d;
}
int main() { f("somepage.html", "" + e); }
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115141
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Dupe of PR115110?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Bisect says r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5.
(Still fails on trunk as of r15-634-gb59de4113262f2.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115131
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
thank you aldy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I have a reduction still running but I didn't do much manual analysis other
than doing enough to remove its dependency on other files + remove the need for
LTO (which was originally required).
I haven't yet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Notable bits:
* -fno-strict-aliasing makes no difference
* -fno-strict-overflow stops the hang
* -fsanitize=address,undefined shows nothing with < GCC 15
* With GCC 15 only, I get
```
$ ./z
url.c:1575:41:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115137
Bug ID: 115137
Summary: [15 regression] Miscompilation of wget (test suite
hangs)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115131
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
struct recv_frame_hdr {
int *adapter
};
union recv_frame {
struct recv_frame_hdr u
};
char *_rtw_init_recv_priv_precvpriv_0;
int _rtw_init_recv_priv_padapter, _rtw_init_recv_priv_i;
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115131
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I'm reducing it now, but attached a partial reduction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115131
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58223
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58223=edit
rtw_recv.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115131
Bug ID: 115131
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building (external) rtl88x2bu
kernel module (in verify_range, at value-range.cc:677)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
long XXH3_len_4to8_64b_len, XXH3_len_0to16_64b___trans_tmp_3,
XXH3_mix2Accs_acc,
XXH3_64bits_internal___trans_tmp_8;
typedef unsigned long XXH3_hashLong64_f();
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reduction is nearly done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115129
Bug ID: 115129
Summary: [12/13/14/15 regression] ICE on recursive realloc call
with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Bug ID: 115128
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building aflplusplus
(internal compiler error: in type, at
value-range.h:983)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115101
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[wrong code] with -O1 |[11/12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115025
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115071
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115069
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115024
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115029
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96059
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|59859 |
See Also|
1 - 100 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo
