[Bug rtl-optimization/115407] New: [15 Regression] ICE: RTL flag check: CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P used with unexpected rtx code 'reg' in get_pool_constant, at varasm.cc:4046 with -O -mcmodel=large -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115407 Bug ID: 115407 Summary: [15 Regression] ICE: RTL flag check: CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P used with unexpected rtx code 'reg' in get_pool_constant, at varasm.cc:4046 with -O

[Bug target/115406] New: [15 Regression] wrong code with vector compare at -O0 with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115406 Bug ID: 115406 Summary: [15 Regression] wrong code with vector compare at -O0 with -mavx512f Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/115405] New: wrong code with _BitInt() sign-extension with -fno-strict-aliasing -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115405 Bug ID: 115405 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() sign-extension with -fno-strict-aliasing -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/115384] New: [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115384 Bug ID: 115384 Summary: [15 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'const_wide_int' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.cc:4088 Product:

[Bug tree-optimization/115352] New: wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_sub_overflow_p() at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115352 Bug ID: 115352 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_sub_overflow_p() at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/115337] New: wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_stdc_first_leading_one() at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115337 Bug ID: 115337 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_stdc_first_leading_one() at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/115051] New: ICE: RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN, at rtl.h:1495 with -O -finstrument-functions-once -finline-stringops -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115051 Bug ID: 115051 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN, at rtl.h:1495 with -O -finstrument-functions-once -finline-stringops

[Bug tree-optimization/114799] New: [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114799 Bug ID: 114799 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85 with

[Bug libgcc/114762] wrong code with _BitInt() division by "BITINT_NN_MIN"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114762 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57981 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57981=edit testcase trying reasonable input for division (and multiplication) This can be used to test various input

[Bug libgcc/114762] New: wrong code with _BitInt() division by "BITINT_NN_MIN"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114762 Bug ID: 114762 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() division by "BITINT_NN_MIN" Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/114755] New: wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114755 Bug ID: 114755 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0 on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/114696] New: ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.cc:2725 insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*anddi_1} with -mapxf -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114696 Bug ID: 114696 Summary: ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.cc:2725 insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*anddi_1} with -mapxf -mx32 Product: gcc

[Bug ipa/114681] New: ICE: in as_a, at is-a.h:255 with -O -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-exceptions -fcondition-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114681 Bug ID: 114681 Summary: ICE: in as_a, at is-a.h:255 with -O -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-exceptions -fcondition-coverage Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/114672] New: during GIMPLE pass: widening_mul ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in 'widen_mult_plus_expr' at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114672 Bug ID: 114672 Summary: during GIMPLE pass: widening_mul ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in 'widen_mult_plus_expr' at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/114644] New: wrong -Wrestrict on snprintf() of distinct struct array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114644 Bug ID: 114644 Summary: wrong -Wrestrict on snprintf() of distinct struct array members Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug gcov-profile/114601] ICE: SIGSEGV in hash_table_mod1 (hash-table.h:344) with -fcondition-coverage -finstrument-functions-once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114601 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- This is still failing as of r14-9822 (after the second PR114599#c7 fix).

[Bug target/114621] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621 Bug ID: 114621 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset Product: gcc Version:

[Bug gcov-profile/114601] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in hash_table_mod1 (hash-table.h:344) with -fcondition-coverage -finstrument-functions-once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114601 Bug ID: 114601 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in hash_table_mod1 (hash-table.h:344) with -fcondition-coverage -finstrument-functions-once Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug ipa/114599] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_set_bit(bitmap_head*, int) (bitmap.cc:975) with -O2 -fcondition-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599 Bug ID: 114599 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_set_bit(bitmap_head*, int) (bitmap.cc:975) with -O2 -fcondition-coverage Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114555] ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57860 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57860=edit another testcase, failing with -O -fno-tree-forwprop Compiler output: $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O -fno-tree-forwprop

[Bug tree-optimization/114555] New: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114555 Bug ID: 114555 Summary: ICE: definition in block 14 does not dominate use in block 15 at -O and above with _BitInt() bitfield Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug analyzer/114473] New: [13/14 Regression] ICE: in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2780 with -fanalyzer -fanalyzer-call-summaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114473 Bug ID: 114473 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE: in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2780 with -fanalyzer -fanalyzer-call-summaries Product: gcc

[Bug analyzer/114472] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in falls_short_of_p, at analyzer/store.cc:365 (in exceeds_p, at analyzer/store.cc:342) with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114472 Bug ID: 114472 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in falls_short_of_p, at analyzer/store.cc:365 (in exceeds_p, at analyzer/store.cc:342) with -fanalyzer Product: gcc

[Bug target/114442] New: ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:8421 with -O2 -mtune=xiangshan-nanhu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114442 Bug ID: 114442 Summary: ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:8421 with -O2 -mtune=xiangshan-nanhu Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/114433] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 9 does not dominate use in block 8 with _BitInt() bitfield shift at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114433 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57786 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57786=edit probably related, not fully reduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/114433] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 9 does not dominate use in block 8 with _BitInt() bitfield shift at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114433 Bug ID: 114433 Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 9 does not dominate use in block 8 with _BitInt() bitfield shift at -O1 and above Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/114425] wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_add_overflow_p() and __builtin_mul_overflow_p() at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114425 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57773 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57773=edit another unreduced testcase ; output differs between -O0 and -O2

[Bug tree-optimization/114425] wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_add_overflow_p() and __builtin_mul_overflow_p() at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114425 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57772 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57772=edit unreduced testcase ; output differs between -O0 and -O2

[Bug tree-optimization/114425] wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_add_overflow_p() at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114425 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57771 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57771=edit another testcase, using __builtin_mul_overflow_p Output for second testcase: $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2

[Bug tree-optimization/114425] New: wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_add_overflow_p() at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114425 Bug ID: 114425 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() __builtin_add_overflow_p() at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/114415] New: wrong code with -Oz -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -flive-range-shrinkage -fweb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415 Bug ID: 114415 Summary: wrong code with -Oz -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -flive-range-shrinkage -fweb Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114405] New: ICE: in min_value, at wide-int.cc:344 with _BitInt() bitfield arithmetics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114405 Bug ID: 114405 Summary: ICE: in min_value, at wide-int.cc:344 with _BitInt() bitfield arithmetics Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libgcc/114397] New: wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114397 Bug ID: 114397 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/114365] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 5 at -O with _BitInt() shift in a bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114365 Bug ID: 114365 Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 5 at -O with _BitInt() shift in a bitfield Product: gcc

[Bug target/114334] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn and:HF?) with lroundf16() and -ffast-math -mavx512fp16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114334 Bug ID: 114334 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn and:HF?) with lroundf16() and -ffast-math -mavx512fp16 Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/114332] New: wrong code with _Atomic _BitInt(5) at -O -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114332 Bug ID: 114332 Summary: wrong code with _Atomic _BitInt(5) at -O -fwrapv Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/114327] `-CST % 1` is wrong for _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114327 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka --- It's not only % 1; wrong results are also for: B x = foo (3, -0x9e9b9fe60); or for B foo (char c, B b) { return b / c; } B x = foo (-0x6, 0); /* 0 / -6 = 0 */ in all these cases, the result is the

[Bug tree-optimization/114329] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed: 'bit_field_ref' of non-mode-precision operand with bitfield _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114329 Bug ID: 114329 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: 'bit_field_ref' of non-mode-precision operand with bitfield _BitInt() Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/114327] New: wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114327 Bug ID: 114327 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/114313] New: ICE: in limb_access_type, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:591 with _BitInt() in a bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114313 Bug ID: 114313 Summary: ICE: in limb_access_type, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:591 with _BitInt() in a bitfield Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/114312] New: ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in chrec_fold_plus_1 (tree-chrec.cc:336) at -O3 with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114312 Bug ID: 114312 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in chrec_fold_plus_1 (tree-chrec.cc:336) at -O3 with _BitInt() Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114299] New: ICE: SIGSEGV: in dyn_cast (is-a.h:282) with -mgeneral-regs-only and __bf16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114299 Bug ID: 114299 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV: in dyn_cast (is-a.h:282) with -mgeneral-regs-only and __bf16 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/114293] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:1132 at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114293 Bug ID: 114293 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:1132 at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug analyzer/114286] New: ICE: in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2762 with _Atomic _BitInt() and -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114286 Bug ID: 114286 Summary: ICE: in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2762 with _Atomic _BitInt() and -fanalyzer Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/111822] [12/13/14 Regression] during RTL pass: lr_shrinkage ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:910 with -O2 -m32 -flive-range-shrinkage -fno-dce -fnon-call-exceptions since r12-5301-g0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111822 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > We've released with the bug so this cannot be P1. Note the bisected to rev. > likely just made this latent issue show up. > > Btw, I can't reproduce - any

[Bug rtl-optimization/114278] New: ICE: in extract_bit_field_1, at expmed.cc:1838 with memmove, _BitInt() and -O2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-ccp -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114278 Bug ID: 114278 Summary: ICE: in extract_bit_field_1, at expmed.cc:1838 with memmove, _BitInt() and -O2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-ccp -m32 Product: gcc

[Bug ipa/114274] New: ICE: tree check: expected block, have ggc_freed in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:284 with -fsave-optimization-record

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114274 Bug ID: 114274 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected block, have ggc_freed in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:284 with -fsave-optimization-record Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/114251] [14 regression] ICE when building python-3.12.2's Hacl_Hash_SHA2.c (tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114251 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/114246] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid argument to gimple call with __builtin_memcpy()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114246 Bug ID: 114246 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid argument to gimple call with __builtin_memcpy() Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/114211] New: [13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114211 Bug ID: 114211 Summary: [13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-coalesce-vars Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/114209] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed: incorrect sharing of tree nodes at -O and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114209 Bug ID: 114209 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: incorrect sharing of tree nodes at -O and above Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/114190] New: wrong code with -O2 -fno-dce -fharden-compares -mvpclmulqdq --param=max-rtl-if-conversion-unpredictable-cost=136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114190 Bug ID: 114190 Summary: wrong code with -O2 -fno-dce -fharden-compares -mvpclmulqdq --param=max-rtl-if-conversion-unpredictable-cost=136 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/114184] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn ) with -Og -mavx512f and __builtin_memmove() _BitInt(256)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114184 Bug ID: 114184 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn ) with -Og -mavx512f and __builtin_memmove() _BitInt(256) Product: gcc

[Bug analyzer/114159] New: [13/14 Regression] ICE: in call_info, at analyzer/call-info.cc:143 with -fanalyzer -fanalyzer-call-summaries --param=analyzer-max-svalue-depth=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114159 Bug ID: 114159 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE: in call_info, at analyzer/call-info.cc:143 with -fanalyzer -fanalyzer-call-summaries

[Bug middle-end/114157] New: during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5561 with -O with _BitInt(256) / vector memmove

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114157 Bug ID: 114157 Summary: during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5561 with -O with _BitInt(256) / vector memmove Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/114156] New: during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5335 with -O -m32 and _BitInt(128) __builtin_memmove()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114156 Bug ID: 114156 Summary: during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5335 with -O -m32 and _BitInt(128) __builtin_memmove() Product: gcc

[Bug target/114139] New: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'reg' in riscv_macro_fusion_pair_p, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:8438 with -O2 -fpic -mexplicit-relocs -mcpu=sifive-p450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114139 Bug ID: 114139 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'reg' in riscv_macro_fusion_pair_p, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:8438 with -O2 -fpic

[Bug target/113742] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have 'e' (rtx set) in riscv_macro_fusion_pair_p, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:8416 with -O2 -finstrument-functions -mtune=sifive-p600-se

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113742 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka --- I can confirm the supplied testcase no longer fails.

[Bug middle-end/113988] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower: internal compiler error: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5470

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988 --- Comment #26 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57548 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57548=edit testcase failing with -O -m32 This testcase does not need -mavx512f, but -m32 instead: $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O

[Bug tree-optimization/114121] New: wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114121 Bug ID: 114121 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/113988] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower: internal compiler error: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5470

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113988 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #25

[Bug tree-optimization/114096] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5533 on vector -> _BitInt() cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114096 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- It is probably dup of PR114073. Sorry about that.

[Bug tree-optimization/114096] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5533 on vector -> _BitInt() cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114096 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- This seems to no longer fail with r14-9166: $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc testcase.c -Wno-psabi /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld: /usr/lib/../lib64/crt1.o: in function `_start': (.text+0x17): undefined reference

[Bug tree-optimization/114096] New: ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5533 on vector -> _BitInt() cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114096 Bug ID: 114096 Summary: ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5533 on vector -> _BitInt() cast Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/114094] New: Assembler messages: Error: junk `nop' after expression with -fprofile -fPIE -mno-direct-extern-access -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114094 Bug ID: 114094 Summary: Assembler messages: Error: junk `nop' after expression with -fprofile -fPIE -mno-direct-extern-access -masm=intel Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/114084] New: ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in fold_build2_loc / fold_binary_loc with _BitInt(127)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084 Bug ID: 114084 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV: infinite recursion in fold_build2_loc / fold_binary_loc with _BitInt(127) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114040] wrong code with __builtin_sub_overflow_p() and _BitInt() at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114040 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57496 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57496=edit probaly related testcase $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 testcase2.c $ ./a.out Aborted

[Bug rtl-optimization/114054] New: ICE: in reduce_to_bit_field_precision, at expr.cc:12658 with -Og -fwhole-program -fno-tree-ccp -fprofile-use -fno-tree-copy-prop and _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114054 Bug ID: 114054 Summary: ICE: in reduce_to_bit_field_precision, at expr.cc:12658 with -Og -fwhole-program -fno-tree-ccp -fprofile-use -fno-tree-copy-prop and _BitInt()

[Bug lto/114043] New: ICE: in write_symbol, at lto-streamer-out.cc:3015 with -O -fstrict-enums -fprofile-generate -flto --param=max-early-inliner-iterations=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114043 Bug ID: 114043 Summary: ICE: in write_symbol, at lto-streamer-out.cc:3015 with -O -fstrict-enums -fprofile-generate -flto --param=max-early-inliner-iterations=0 Product:

[Bug tree-optimization/114041] New: wrong code with _BitInt() and -O -fgraphite-identity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114041 Bug ID: 114041 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() and -O -fgraphite-identity Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/114042] New: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114042 Bug ID: 114042 Summary: diagnostics about __builtin_stdc_bit_ceil() mentions __builtin_clzg() Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/114044] New: ICE: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:208 with _BitInt() and -O -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114044 Bug ID: 114044 Summary: ICE: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:208 with _BitInt() and -O -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114040] New: wrong code with __builtin_sub_overflow_p() and _BitInt() at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114040 Bug ID: 114040 Summary: wrong code with __builtin_sub_overflow_p() and _BitInt() at -O2 and above Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/114038] New: wrong code with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt() at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114038 Bug ID: 114038 Summary: wrong code with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt() at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/114016] New: ICE: in AT_unsigned, at dwarf2out.cc:4592 with -march=armv9-a -gbtf or -gctf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114016 Bug ID: 114016 Summary: ICE: in AT_unsigned, at dwarf2out.cc:4592 with -march=armv9-a -gbtf or -gctf Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug debug/114015] New: ICE: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.cc:9266 with -g -fvar-tracking-assignments -fdebug-types-section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114015 Bug ID: 114015 Summary: ICE: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.cc:9266 with -g -fvar-tracking-assignments -fdebug-types-section Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug debug/114014] New: ICE: 'verify_type' failed: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible with -gbtf or -gctf on gcc.dg/gnu23-tag-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114014 Bug ID: 114014 Summary: ICE: 'verify_type' failed: 'TYPE_CANONICAL' is not compatible with -gbtf or -gctf on gcc.dg/gnu23-tag-1.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug target/114000] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect, at cfgrtl.cc:1556 with -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -mexplicit-relocs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114000 Bug ID: 114000 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in force_nonfallthru_and_redirect, at cfgrtl.cc:1556 with -O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC

[Bug analyzer/113999] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in string_cst_has_null_terminator, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3651 with -fanalyzer on gcc.dg/tree-ssa/strncpy-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113999 Bug ID: 113999 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in string_cst_has_null_terminator, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3651 with -fanalyzer on gcc.dg/tree-ssa/strncpy-2.c

[Bug analyzer/113998] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in get_last_byte_offset, at analyzer/ranges.cc:171 with -fanalyzer and __builtin_strncpy()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113998 Bug ID: 113998 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in get_last_byte_offset, at analyzer/ranges.cc:171 with -fanalyzer and __builtin_strncpy() Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/113995] New: ICE: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2299 with [[arm::streaming_compatible]] and -march=armv9-a+sve -finstrument-functions -fstack-clash-protection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113995 Bug ID: 113995 Summary: ICE: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2299 with [[arm::streaming_compatible]] and -march=armv9-a+sve -finstrument-functions -fstack-clash-protection

[Bug tree-optimization/113993] New: ICE: in get_no_error_domain, at tree-call-cdce.cc:815 with __builtin_exp2f32x() at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113993 Bug ID: 113993 Summary: ICE: in get_no_error_domain, at tree-call-cdce.cc:815 with __builtin_exp2f32x() at -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113962] [14 Regression] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2156 with -O -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113962 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Most likely a dup of bug 113967 I am sorry for the confusion; the bugzilla stopped responding while creating this PR for the first time, and since I there

[Bug analyzer/113983] New: [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have vector_cst in maybe_undo_optimize_bit_field_compare, at analyzer/region-model-manager.cc:606 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113983 Bug ID: 113983 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have vector_cst in maybe_undo_optimize_bit_field_compare, at

[Bug c++/113969] ICE: SIGSEGV in finish_enum_value_list (decl.cc:17143) (or build_enumerator (decl.cc:17438) ) on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113969 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57449 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57449=edit very similar testcase, ICEing in build_enumerator instead $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc testcase2.C -wrapper valgrind,-q

[Bug c++/113969] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in finish_enum_value_list (decl.cc:17143) on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113969 Bug ID: 113969 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in finish_enum_value_list (decl.cc:17143) on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/113968] New: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.cc:488 with -fcontracts and invalid member in contract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113968 Bug ID: 113968 Summary: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.cc:488 with -fcontracts and invalid member in contract Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113967] New: [14 Regression] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2156 with -O -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113967 Bug ID: 113967 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2156 with -O -mavx512f Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/113876] New: ICE: in ix86_expand_epilogue, at config/i386/i386.cc:10101 with -O -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -finstrument-functions -mapxf -mcmodel=large and _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113876 Bug ID: 113876 Summary: ICE: in ix86_expand_epilogue, at config/i386/i386.cc:10101 with -O -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -finstrument-functions -mapxf

[Bug tree-optimization/113849] New: wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113849 Bug ID: 113849 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O1 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/113829] New: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in overloaded_hash, at config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4341 with invalid __riscv_vfredosum_tu()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113829 Bug ID: 113829 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in overloaded_hash, at config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4341 with

[Bug target/113828] New: ICE: in riscv_expand_mult_with_const_int, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:2587 with -march=rv64ifv and vfloat32m1_t/vfloat32m4_t function args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113828 Bug ID: 113828 Summary: ICE: in riscv_expand_mult_with_const_int, at config/riscv/riscv.cc:2587 with -march=rv64ifv and vfloat32m1_t/vfloat32m4_t function args Product:

[Bug target/113819] New: ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx code_label) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1511 with -mstringop-strategy=loop and asm goto with impossible constraint and _

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113819 Bug ID: 113819 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx code_label) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1511 with -mstringop-strategy=loop and asm goto with impossible

[Bug tree-optimization/113818] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing 'PHI' def with -Os -fnon-call-exceptions -finstrument-functions-once and _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113818 Bug ID: 113818 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing 'PHI' def with -Os -fnon-call-exceptions -finstrument-functions-once and _BitInt() Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/113774] wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113774 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 57341 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57341=edit another testcase, failing at -O1 I didn't check if the PR113753 patch fixes this. Output: $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/113783] New: ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5455 with -O -mavx512f and _BitInt() in memcpy()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113783 Bug ID: 113783 Summary: ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5455 with -O -mavx512f and _BitInt() in memcpy() Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113778] New: ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx code_label) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1506 with -march=armv9-a+sme -fhardened

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113778 Bug ID: 113778 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx code_label) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1506 with -march=armv9-a+sme -fhardened Product: gcc

[Bug debug/113777] New: ICE: in add_child_die_after, at dwarf2out.cc:5785 with -g -fsso-struct=big-endian and __attribute__((__hardbool__))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113777 Bug ID: 113777 Summary: ICE: in add_child_die_after, at dwarf2out.cc:5785 with -g -fsso-struct=big-endian and __attribute__((__hardbool__)) Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/113774] New: wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113774 Bug ID: 113774 Summary: wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/113766] New: ICE: in generate_insn, at config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4186 with (invalid?) __riscv_vfredosum_tu()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113766 Bug ID: 113766 Summary: ICE: in generate_insn, at config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4186 with (invalid?) __riscv_vfredosum_tu() Product: gcc Version: 14.0

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >