[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

2024-06-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09ae36461ed34f343f2d8299bad7e394cccf996e commit r15-1004-g09ae36461ed34f343f2d8299bad7e394cccf996e Author: Rainer Orth Date: Tue

[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

2024-05-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.3|13.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub

[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

2024-05-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f97d86f897bcf0ffda4d8d2e5b78a160e9ece140 commit r15-486-gf97d86f897bcf0ffda4d8d2e5b78a160e9ece140 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Tue

[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

2024-05-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- When I hack locally to avoid the indirection in the definitions of the SOCK_* constants, only two gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL on Solaris: FAIL:

[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

2024-05-13 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- I think I've found what's going on: really has #if !defined(_XPG4_2) || defined(__EXTENSIONS__) #ifndef NC_TPI_CLTS #define NC_TPI_CLTS 1 /* must agree with

[Bug analyzer/107750] [13/14/15 Regression] Many gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests FAIL

2024-05-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107750 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- David, after your amazing work on PR analyzer/111475, there are only a handful of analyzer failures left on trunk: FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c