https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105672
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> :: note: tuple and std::tuple are not the same type
And just to be clear, it was very intentional that this suggestion *doesn't*
show the template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105672
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #2)
> And drop the "non-scalar type" part - does it add anything meaningful to the
> diagnostic?
Good point. I assume the intention of that wording is to say "I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105672
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> Could we add a note for ill-formed conversions between two types that have
> the same name, to make it more obvious that they're defined in different
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105672
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105672
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Another option suggested by Barry Revzin is to line up the types, so that the
type's name is in the same column so the different nested-name-qualifier is
more obvious:
vt.C:276:15: error: conversion from
