[Bug c++/109021] accept size parameter in extern C

2023-08-17 Thread muecker at gwdg dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021 --- Comment #6 from Martin Uecker --- Note that I do not propose to add variably modified types to C++. This would indeed be a major extension. I simply propose to ignore the size expressions in C headers as a usability improvement. My

[Bug c++/109021] accept size parameter in extern C

2023-08-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #4) > Sorry, how can an enhancement request that addresses a real C/C++ > compatibility problem be marked "resolved invalid" ? Because GCC does like these days to

[Bug c++/109021] accept size parameter in extern C

2023-08-15 Thread muecker at gwdg dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021 --- Comment #4 from Martin Uecker --- Sorry, how can an enhancement request that addresses a real C/C++ compatibility problem be marked "resolved invalid" ?

[Bug c++/109021] accept size parameter in extern C

2023-08-06 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 110920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/109021] accept size parameter in extern C

2023-03-04 Thread muecker at gwdg dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021 --- Comment #2 from Martin Uecker --- True. But we could still take it as a hint about where this is not useful to users to diagnose this as an error.

[Bug c++/109021] accept size parameter in extern C

2023-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---