https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
--- Comment #6 from Aaron Ballman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Maybe my issue is this has been a documented extension for 20 years now.
Which is totally fair -- we don't usually enable congratulatory diagnostics by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe my issue is this has been a documented extension for 20 years now.
-pedantic or -std=c++NN has always rejected it like it should. GCC has other
extensions which folks could use by accident too (like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
--- Comment #3 from Aaron Ballman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Since VLA support has been a GNU C++ extension way before it was proposed to
> WG21, I doubt we want to enable this by default.
I think it boils down to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC has documented VLA extensions for C++ support since
r0-35216-g4b404517536c85 (PR 930 which was done in 2001). So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|