http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59300
--- Comment #1 from Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail dot com> --- clang had an even stranger behavior (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18174). I fixed that in a way that it now agrees with gcc on the testcase in this bug. It would still be nice to know if the current behavior is intentional or not.
