[Bug c++/60277] Bogus "inline function virtual ..." used but never defined

2021-12-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus "inline function virtual ..." used but never defined

2018-05-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus inline function virtual ... used but never defined

2015-05-07 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus inline function virtual ... used but never defined

2014-02-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 21 14:56:46 2014 New Revision: 208001 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208001root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/60277 * call.c (build_array_conv):

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus inline function virtual ... used but never defined

2014-02-19 Thread nlewycky at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 --- Comment #1 from Nick Lewycky nlewycky at google dot com --- Furthermore, if the testcase ended with: f-Foo::func(); then the warning should be issued.