[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

2022-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

2021-11-14 Thread oficsu at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Ofee Oficsu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oficsu at gmail dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

2021-10-19 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||44209 CC|

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

2020-11-04 Thread federico.kircheis at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Federico Kircheis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||federico.kircheis at gmail dot com

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

2019-02-19 Thread pskocik at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 --- Comment #8 from pskocik at gmail dot com --- I'd also very much welcome a way to silence this (like with -Wno-undefined-inline on clang). My reason for wanting it is I'd like to prototype a non-static inline function in one header (a

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

2019-02-19 Thread pskocik at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 pskocik at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pskocik at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/66918] Disable inline function declared but never defined warning

2015-07-20 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c/66918] Disable inline function declared but never defined warning

2015-07-20 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) I don't think the C++ FE has this warning; it's about C99 inlines. If not, it has a very similar warning:

[Bug c/66918] Disable inline function declared but never defined warning

2015-07-19 Thread eugene.zelenko at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 --- Comment #4 from Eugene Zelenko eugene.zelenko at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3) Does Clang have an option for this? GCC could use the same name. (The same warning exists in the C++ FE, thus it should

[Bug c/66918] Disable inline function declared but never defined warning

2015-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could you explain why you don't want to have this warning really. This warning is telling you that the inline function is not defined just like static functions.

[Bug c/66918] Disable inline function declared but never defined warning

2015-07-18 Thread eugene.zelenko at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 --- Comment #2 from Eugene Zelenko eugene.zelenko at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) Could you explain why you don't want to have this warning really. This warning is telling you that the inline function is not

[Bug c/66918] Disable inline function declared but never defined warning

2015-07-18 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last