https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17d46f069ceb55faa0db80a47c31710c7e6bcb11
commit r12-8950-g17d46f069ceb55faa0db80a47c31710c7e6bcb11
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5ad6f8415171798adaff5787400505ce9882144
commit r13-2385-gd5ad6f8415171798adaff5787400505ce9882144
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #1)
> If I recall the conversation correctly, either the CPU-specific D language
> hooks should be moved to macros - equivalent to TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS and
> others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
If I recall the conversation correctly, either the CPU-specific D language
hooks should be moved to macros - equivalent to TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS and
others. Or the tm_d file should be packed with a lot
