https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kharlamov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> The advantage of showing the location of the constructor is that you can see
> which object is being destroyed. If the location was shown as the end of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The advantage of showing the location of the constructor is that you can see
which object is being destroyed. If the location was shown as the end of the
scope, all local variables would show the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91751
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there are a few dups of this bug.
What happens is the call to deconstructor's line is the same as the object
line; rather than the end of the scope.
