https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilobyte at angband dot pl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Bug 99090 depends on bug 91602, which changed state.
Bug 91602 Summary: GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to
misconfigured leb128 support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5040344b9ca609e19ee59ba56cd4af9697a1692
commit r11-7472-gb5040344b9ca609e19ee59ba56cd4af9697a1692
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
I tested it with a riscv-gnu-toolchain build and check. The 4 -gsplit-dwarf
testcases that fail without the patch work with the patch.
I also tried a build and check with -gsplit-dwarf enabled by default and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Making it work is desirable in any case. But, the emitted debug sections will
be in various spots less compact when .uleb128/.sleb128 don't support
non-constant operands.
Though, I'm afraid the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson ---
Yes we could have partial uleb128 support. There is only a problem if at least
one label is in the code section.
There is another proposed solution to add special relaxable relocations for
uleb128 but the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
11 matches
Mail list logo