[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #47 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7964ab6c364c410c34efe7ca2eba797d36525349 commit r12-8230-g7964ab6c364c410c34efe7ca2eba797d36525349 Author: Mikael Morin Date:

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #46 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:761dda57482295f9c41fcf87e5defa2ac1959f03 commit r12-8229-g761dda57482295f9c41fcf87e5defa2ac1959f03 Author: Mikael Morin Date:

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #45 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e72fbb6915c1dd1a52ecef55e10329e353cc3072 commit r12-8228-ge72fbb6915c1dd1a52ecef55e10329e353cc3072 Author: Mikael Morin Date:

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-04-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #44 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89ca0fffa48b799b228beee48a16e26e24d8e199 commit r12-8227-g89ca0fffa48b799b228beee48a16e26e24d8e199 Author: Mikael Morin Date:

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-04-05 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #42 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 52717 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52717=edit hack to rewrite all ARRA_REFs This shows a simple hack emitting *( + offset) from gfc_build_array_ref. That

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #41 from Richard Biener --- -- random ideas dumping below -- so reading about ISO_Fortran_binding.h it seems to be that a base of the object isn't readily available and making it available would require quite some computation.

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-30 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #40 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 30 Mar 2022, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 > > --- Comment #39 from Thomas Koenig --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #39 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > The issue itself is long latent so we probably have to live with GCC 12 > exposing slightly more cases of it in the real world (I have yet to see > one

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #38 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15) > One possibility would be to extend the patch Sandra posted at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-January/055563.html > to scalarization. As

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #37 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #36) > On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > For gcc-12, is there a way to add a middle-end workaround using annotations > > on > >

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-28 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 > > --- Comment #35 from Mikael Morin --- > A little status update. > > I have

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-27 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #35 from Mikael Morin --- A little status update. I have pushed the latest patch attached to this PR a little further, but not far enough to reduce the number of testsuite regressions to 0. I plan to submit it for gcc-13, but it

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-24 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-03-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Summary|Wrong array