--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 18:34
---
Probably the right way to solve this is to call the code in c-ppoutput.c from
the Fortran frontend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
11:33 ---
This one is certainly going to annoy lots of people (when 4.0 is released, I
think we will get bug-reports by the ton).
This should be easy to solve for someone who knows the interactions between GCC
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11 12:05
---
It is annoying enough that the preprocessor is invoked via cc1. Is there a
reason for this, besides that it is the example given in the specfiles?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
12:47 ---
*** Bug 20943 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
12:48 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
It is annoying enough that the preprocessor is invoked via cc1. Is there a
reason for this, besides that it is the example given in the specfiles?
Besides that is the only
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de 2005-04-11 17:16 ---
Subject: Re: -fno-second-underscore induces warning for
fortran that needs preprocessing
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
17:20 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
We're using the traditional preprocessor. This is a separate executable, cpp,
which is built separately. So the question remains: why do we run cc1?
cpp just calls cc1.
There
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de 2005-04-11 17:39 ---
Subject: Re: -fno-second-underscore induces warning for
fortran that needs preprocessing
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-08
00:34 ---
*** Bug 20374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22
14:06 ---
*** Bug 20138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12
15:22 ---
Confirmed, the issue is that we are passing the options to the cc1, the
preprocessor (and the C
compiler).
--
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
