https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #33 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #32 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 57563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57563=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-33.c.265t.optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #23)
The bb-slp-14.c testcase now FAILs on Solaris/SPARC. Attaching the dump.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 6 06:47:38 2015
New Revision: 222843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222843root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #28 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35476
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35476action=edit
bb-slp-32.c.141t.slp2 dump
A reghunt just confirmed that the patch also caused
XPASS:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 6 May 2015, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #28 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 6 12:21:01 2015
New Revision: 222849
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222849root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35454
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35454action=edit
bb-slp-14.c.141t.slp2 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 28 08:30:44 2015
New Revision: 222514
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222514root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33433
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33433action=edit
bb-slp-11.c.126t.slp2 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #17 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33434
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33434action=edit
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
So ... can you test enabling vect64 for sparc?
While it works for the test at hand, the two other tests using vect64
(bb-slp-11.c and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #16)
Created attachment 33433 [details]
bb-slp-11.c.126t.slp2 dump
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-11.c:19:8:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #17)
Created attachment 33434 [details]
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
For this we see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33426
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33426action=edit
vect dump
Sure, I meant to but forgot...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
Created attachment 33426 [details]
vect dump
Sure, I meant to but forgot...
Ok:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
Created attachment 33426 [details]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Henrik Holst from comment #4)
Thank you Richard for looking into this issue.
You probably know already exactly why this bug appeared. I just wanted to
stress the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
(In reply to Henrik Holst from comment #4)
Thank you Richard for looking into this issue.
You probably know already exactly why
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 28 13:13:45 2014
New Revision: 214678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214678root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
testcases in comment#4 should now work (no need to file a separate bug).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Like
Index: gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-slp.c (revision 214572)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-slp.c (working
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #4 from Henrik Holst holst at matmech dot com ---
Thank you Richard for looking into this issue.
You probably know already exactly why this bug appeared. I just wanted to
stress the severity of this issue, and especially for Fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #5 from Henrik Holst holst at matmech dot com ---
The `alpha` argument in test1 subroutine went missing. (Visual copy-paste
between two machines... :-))
32 matches
Mail list logo
