https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
*** Bug 103461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f33fdda0b805ff6097f9f325d73a4b07e72170b0
commit r12-5615-gf33fdda0b805ff6097f9f325d73a4b07e72170b0
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
>
> --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So range-op.cc eventually wants to look at 'cfun' which of course is a
> non-go in IPA context.
>
> void
> operator_div::wi_fold (irange , tree type,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> // If flag_non_call_exceptions, we must not eliminate a division by zero.
> if (cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions)
Note the check is too restrictive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103451
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |ipa
Target Milestone|---
10 matches
Mail list logo
