https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63533
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63533
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63533
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63533
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
If g is called with argument that is usually 0,
then the partial inlining makes sense.
But note that there are zero callers of g in the file so no inlining can happen
anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63533
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note the section of the split function is also different from the original
function if the user had supplied a section.
