[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2022-06-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #49 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2021-11-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #48 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ece90ffa9ce63b416296bd662b8117d9b538913 commit r12-4920-g1ece90ffa9ce63b416296bd662b8117d9b538913 Author: Martin Jambor Date:

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2021-06-28 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] wrong |[10/11 Regression] wrong

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.3|10.4 --- Comment #42 from Richard

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2021-03-30 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #41 from Martin Jambor --- I reworked the series in order to avoid the biggest objection and posted them as https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/567471.html and

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2021-03-12 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #40 from Martin Jambor --- I have adjusted the patches a little and re-posted them as https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566681.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566682.html .

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2021-01-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek --- What happened to that patch series? Has it been committed without showing it up in the PR, something else?

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-11-26 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #38 from Martin Jambor --- *** Bug 97980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-07-27 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suochenyao at 163 dot com --- Comment

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-07-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|10.3 --- Comment #36 from Richard

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-06-08 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Bug 93385 depends on bug 95113, which changed state. Bug 95113 Summary: [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 What|Removed

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-05-28 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #35 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch series that deals with this issue, including proper adjustments to debug info, on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546702.html

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-05-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|10.2 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

2020-05-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #33 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:375a77925c320a273d3b1ef3182f29f31aaa8edf commit r11-38-g375a77925c320a273d3b1ef3182f29f31aaa8edf Author: Martin Jambor Date: