https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107850
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f54ceb2062c7fef294f85ae093914fa6c7ca35b8
commit r13-4306-gf54ceb2062c7fef294f85ae093914fa6c7ca35b8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107850
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107850
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have very little sympathy for this use case, predicates that can't be called
with const arguments are always wrong. I'm inclined to say the standard should
be fixed to match our new behaviour.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107850
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std::erase_if (map) forces |[12/13 Regression]