[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 Kacper changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cosiekvfj at o2 dot pl --- Comment #10 from

[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:741c7350c08b0884689466867b6c9e711c7b109e commit r12-4061-g741c7350c08b0884689466867b6c9e711c7b109e Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- In my GCC fork I just switched clamp to use min and max unconditionally: https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/ec5ecc2e142fbb7fc532a5ef9527b61675bcbfc4

[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |libstdc++ --- Comment #5 from