https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
>
> --- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke ---
> I have tested the same with gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On January 22, 2016 6:07:08 PM GMT+01:00, "daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
>
>--- Comment #4 from Daniel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke ---
I see, but the output of the same GCC version should be the same regardless the
host if the target is the same, right?
I used the same source tree to build GCC 5.3.0 for x86_64-linux-gnu and for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke ---
I have tested the same with gcc 4.9.3 to make clear whether this is a
regression or not. Sadly I was not able to build the libstdc++ with -flto.
Compiling the same program as before did not result in a ICE