[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

2021-12-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

2016-01-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 > > --- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke --- > I have tested the same with gcc

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

2016-01-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 22, 2016 6:07:08 PM GMT+01:00, "daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 > >--- Comment #4 from Daniel

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

2016-01-22 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke --- I see, but the output of the same GCC version should be the same regardless the host if the target is the same, right? I used the same source tree to build GCC 5.3.0 for x86_64-linux-gnu and for

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

2016-01-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

2016-01-21 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke --- I have tested the same with gcc 4.9.3 to make clear whether this is a regression or not. Sadly I was not able to build the libstdc++ with -flto. Compiling the same program as before did not result in a ICE