https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9d2a95be5680e04f53141c2675798b06d23f409
commit r14-9174-gf9d2a95be5680e04f53141c2675798b06d23f409
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As in the following patch, which is supposed to track the origin of the 6
something0
variables in bitmasks, bit 1 means it comes (partly) from op0, bit 2 means it
comes (partly) from op1.
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or perhaps the
if (ok
&& ((var0 != 0) + (var1 != 0)
+ (minus_var0 != 0) + (minus_var1 != 0)
+ (con0 != 0) + (con1 != 0)
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, I must say not really sure why this wouldn't recurse infinitely even
without the casts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bet the associate code is really unprepared to have unfolded trees around,
which hasn't been the case before delayed folding has been introduced to C and
C++ FEs.
Unfortunately it isn't complete, because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is another testcase, the only use of _BitInt is in the cast, everything
else is a bitfield:
```
struct a
{
unsigned t:(sizeof(int)*8-1);
};
typedef unsigned _BitInt(sizeof(int)*8-1) ub31;
struct a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
