[Bug middle-end/60089] Complex arithmetic instructions

2021-11-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60089 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #5 from

[Bug middle-end/60089] Complex arithmetic instructions

2014-02-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60089 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/60089] Complex arithmetic instructions

2014-02-06 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60089 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail

[Bug middle-end/60089] Complex arithmetic instructions

2014-02-06 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60089 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) You'd need to disable complex lowering at the GIMPLE level and see what support is missing from RTL expansion for example. For the

[Bug middle-end/60089] Complex arithmetic instructions

2014-02-06 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60089 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Is the complex multiplication instruction C99 Annex G-conforming, or could it only be used for -fcx-limited-range?